"The function of AssetExplorer meets the expectation from acquisitions and the decommissioning of assets. Everything has been covered by this solution that needs to be."
"It assists us in tracking software details, including software replacements, licensing information, and software renewal."
"The most valuable feature of the System Center is the easy management of everything."
"Everything, from patches to deployments, can be done remotely."
"The most valuable feature of System Center is remote deployment."
"System Center is easy to configure."
"System Center helps us manage everything in the company."
"It would be beneficial if the software could retain the original asset while updating the information for the new product."
"ManageEngine AssetExplorer has a lot to improve. However, the vendor of this solution has many solutions that are made for certain use cases."
"SCCM is expensive for me personally."
"The way the backups can be done could be easier."
"The integration could improve in the future. Additionally, a single reporting feature for databases would be useful."
"System Center should make its interface and console easy to understand and operate."
"The security of the System Center can be enhanced."
ManageEngine AssetExplorer is ranked 2nd in Software Asset Management with 2 reviews while System Center is ranked 1st in Software Asset Management with 6 reviews. ManageEngine AssetExplorer is rated 8.6, while System Center is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of ManageEngine AssetExplorer writes "A reliable and scalable IT asset management solution ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of System Center writes "Great for remote support, is very stable, and allows companies to cut costs". ManageEngine AssetExplorer is most compared with , whereas System Center is most compared with .
See our list of best Software Asset Management vendors.
We monitor all Software Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
