No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Lumos vs Microsoft Entra ID Governance comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Lumos
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
User Provisioning Software (28th), Identity Management (IM) (35th), Access Management (43rd), SaaS Management Platforms (9th), Identity Governance Administration (IGA) (10th)
Microsoft Entra ID Governance
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (10th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Identity and Access Management solutions, they serve different purposes. Lumos is designed for Identity Governance Administration (IGA) and holds a mindshare of 1.2%, up 0.6% compared to last year.
Microsoft Entra ID Governance, on the other hand, focuses on Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS), holds 3.2% mindshare, up 1.1% since last year.
Identity Governance Administration (IGA) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Lumos1.2%
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud32.6%
Saviynt Identity Cloud19.5%
Other46.699999999999996%
Identity Governance Administration (IGA)
Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Microsoft Entra ID Governance3.2%
Microsoft Entra ID18.5%
Google Cloud Identity10.7%
Other67.6%
Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

YX
Mass Spectometry Specialist at a pharma/biotech company with 11-50 employees
Extremely reliable, definitely worth the price, with a unique feature
Our primary use case is for proteomics to identify and quantify proteins and samples It has improved our organization because it is fast, accurate, and easy to maintain. The most valuable feature I have found is the electron transfer piece is unique and helpful. One item I would like to see…
JG
Lead Cloud Systems Architect at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Access reviews and lifecycle policies have streamlined privileged account oversight and onboarding automation
I am not using the access review agent feature in Microsoft Entra ID Governance because that is in preview right now, and I do not know if that is available. My perception of Microsoft Entra ID Governance's ability to handle large volumes of users access and management tasks is good. There is a slight delay from creation of the actual access review to how long it takes to complete the actual review. For us, we are a large organization with over ten thousand employees. If we are doing a review on a larger group that has thousands of employees inside of it, it takes a while to actually complete, and then it becomes a headache for managers. If there were a way to condense that or decrease the amount of time it takes to do it, that would be better. We inspect thousands of people. Microsoft Entra ID Governance can be improved, and I actually have two tickets in with you now about improvements. I would have to dig it up because I do not know off the top of my head, but you can find it. We have two tickets that have been put in by the FastTrack team that I work with for identity governance. I think it was something about the ability to stop reviews early. When you create an access review now, and you put a time gate on it, say it is the end of this week, once the access review is finished, the managers went in there and finished the access review, you cannot finish it until the end of the week. That is a slight problem because we do not get a notification for people that are on the identity side that they have actually finished that, and I think there are two tickets in for that right now.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It has improved our organization because it is fast, accurate, and easy to maintain."
"The product's most valuable features are the robust audit trail capabilities."
"The most valuable functions in Microsoft Entra ID Governance are ease of use, conducting access reviews, and tighter platform coupling."
"The solution gives me the capability to automatically move guest accounts from the tenant without any manual intervention."
"The most valuable features are multifactor authentication and account creation for the Exchange environment in Office 365."
"The platform's most valuable feature is the single sign-on service."
"Regarding Microsoft Entra ID Governance integration with Microsoft services, there is automated identity lifecycle management in the product."
"It is compliant with our RVRT and CSV guidelines."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Entra ID Governance is access reviews."
 

Cons

"One item I would like to see improved is the ability to clean the deeper parts of the machine with simplicity."
"There is a slight delay from creation of the actual access review to how long it takes to complete the actual review. For us, we are a large organization with over ten thousand employees... it takes a while to actually complete, and then it becomes a headache for managers."
"Bridging between on-premises and cloud services has the potential for improvement. For instance, it would be beneficial to be able to synchronize traditional directory schemas with Azure. I need to maintain an on-premises Active Directory server for certain required services."
"If you want to conduct access review of database-based applications, then you cannot do that."
"Microsoft Entra ID Governance is relatively new, and some features require more development. For example, when creating user access review campaigns, we can't specify the time to send emails to reviewers—only the date."
"One area for improvement in Microsoft Entra ID Governance could be providing more granular control over security policies."
"There are some areas where improvements are necessary. Even though we have almost the full package, there are some bugs."
"The platform's configuration process needs improvement."
"The solution lacks the feature to work well with third-party applications."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The machine costs around five hundred thousand dollars."
"While other products give the pricing for their application, Microsoft Entra ID Governance has a per-user-based license model."
"In the education sector where I work, the annual cost for my Google and Microsoft environments is approximately $35,000. This covers the needs of 3,400 students and 800 faculty and staff members."
"The solution's pricing is not low but reasonable."
"There are no additional costs besides the standard licensing fees."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Governance Administration (IGA) solutions are best for your needs.
885,728 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
10%
Construction Company
10%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
10%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise9
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Microsoft Entra ID Governance?
The most valuable feature of Microsoft Entra ID Governance is access reviews.
What needs improvement with Microsoft Entra ID Governance?
I am not using the access review agent feature in Microsoft Entra ID Governance because that is in preview right now, and I do not know if that is available. My perception of Microsoft Entra ID Gov...
What is your primary use case for Microsoft Entra ID Governance?
My main use cases for Microsoft Entra ID Governance are access reviews, but specifically Privileged Identity Management access reviews. I am utilizing the user-centric access reviews in Microsoft E...
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about SailPoint, One Identity, Omada and others in Identity Governance Administration (IGA). Updated: March 2026.
885,728 professionals have used our research since 2012.