We performed a comparison between Lucidworks and OpenText IDOL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic, IBM, OpenText and others in Indexing and Search."The valuable features are automation and multiple connectors available out of the box. It is simple to manage and easier to use for all users."
"Provides the ability to control how indexing and searching perform and controls how the scoring for search results is done, letting you customize the search experience according to your needs."
"IDOL has several important visual analytics, like face recognition and object detection and recognition."
"Having some kind of prebuilt client UI will be helpful."
"The solution could improve by adding more AI and natural language processing."
"There is room for improvement in some very important capabilities in visual analytics. They have been focusing on improving the face recognition algorithm. The accuracy of object detection could be improved as well and I know they are working on that at the moment."
Earn 20 points
Lucidworks is ranked 7th in Indexing and Search while OpenText IDOL is ranked 3rd in Indexing and Search with 5 reviews. Lucidworks is rated 8.6, while OpenText IDOL is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Lucidworks writes "Provides the ability to control how indexing and searching perform". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText IDOL writes "Scales linearly and vertically; primarily used in AI". Lucidworks is most compared with Elastic Search and Coveo, whereas OpenText IDOL is most compared with Elastic Search, Lucene and Google Search Appliance.
See our list of best Indexing and Search vendors.
We monitor all Indexing and Search reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
