LogRhythm NetMon vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG comparison

LogRhythm and NETSCOUT are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. LogRhythm is ranked #55 with an average rating of 7.7, while NETSCOUT is ranked #78. LogRhythm holds a 0.3% mindshare in NMS, compared to NETSCOUT’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of LogRhythm users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of NETSCOUT users who would recommend it.

LogRhythm NetMon

Read 11 LogRhythm NetMon reviews

561 Views
381 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Read 13 NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG reviews

547 Views
311 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

LogRhythm NetMon

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

LogRhythm NetMon and NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG compete in the network monitoring space, with NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG having the upper hand due to its comprehensive features offering greater value for the price.

Features: LogRhythm NetMon offers intuitive navigation, real-time network monitoring, and effective anomaly detection. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG provides deep packet inspection, extensive data analysis capabilities, and a robust security solution.

Room for Improvement: LogRhythm NetMon could enhance its data analysis features, expand on its current security measures, and improve its integration with third-party tools. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG might streamline its deployment process, refine its user interface for ease of use, and reduce the learning curve associated with its advanced features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LogRhythm NetMon is straightforward to deploy and known for responsive customer service, enhancing user satisfaction. In contrast, NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG may require expert assistance during deployment but offers a comprehensive support system post-deployment.

Pricing and ROI: LogRhythm NetMon's initial setup costs are accessible, offering quick ROI for budget-focused organizations. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG, while having higher setup costs, targets long-term ROI due to its rich feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed LogRhythm NetMon vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

LogRhythm NetMon vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,236 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LogRhythm NetMon

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

55th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

78th

Average Rating

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of LogRhythm NetMon is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

AshishDubey

Product manager at Tata Communications Ltd

A stable and scalable tool useful for network behavior analysis, DPA, and network forensic services

I have not worked much on LogRhythm NetMon to be able to comment on what needs improvement in the product since there is another team in our company that is working on the solution presently. LogRhythm NetMon's pricing model is an area of concern that should be made a little bit cheaper in comparison to the other players in the market currently. With players like IBM QRadar that propose QNI or Darktrace in the market, LogRhythm NetMon needs to consider a reduction in its pricing model.

Read full review

Michael Gideon Genita

Associate System Engineer at SMS Global Technologies, Inc.

Easy to set up with good documentation and helpful support

I'm using it for a customer The packet flow switch is the most valuable aspect of the solution. It's an easy product to set up. We can scale the solution if we need to. It's stable. The documentation is well-written and quite useful. It's compatible with other products. Under the pocket flow…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"LogRhythm NetMon's most impressive feature is that it's a bundled package, so you're not just relying on monthly data; you get a six-month view for more comprehensive indicators of compromise. This dual approach is precious. We implement LogRhythm NetMon in our cybersecurity strategy mainly for compliance and correlation of network, user, and decision activities, particularly for network firewalls and access control."

"The initial setup is straightforward because we can deploy an open server."

"It has a very strong artificial intelligence engine."

"Visibility is a valuable feature, the ability to see even if the traffic is not going into the firewall"

"The analytics feature is the most valuable feature."

"The most valuable feature is the log, which can be analyzed by our SIEM solution."

"The protocols with which you see the traffic for a particular website that a client has in their environment, for example, are valuable. We can monitor whether the traffic is up to the mark or whether they need to add more bandwidth. Also, we can see if we're able to get real-time environment data as well. The customization dashboard is really good. LogRhythm NetMon has its own in-built dashboards which are helpful in guiding customization."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

More LogRhythm NetMon pros

"I love the single pane of glass view. It makes it easier to not have to navigate everywhere. It allows more simplistic visibility, without having to go from tool to tool to tool, or from window to window to window."

"It has cut our troubleshooting down by days. Once we have a product in place, we show people examples of how it can streamline their troubleshooting process."

"The most valuable features are speed and cost."

"The most valuable feature is utilization."

"The product is stable. I have never had any issue where we have lost an InfiniStream, or visibility from that particular InfiniStream, throughout the bank."

"It's an easy product to set up."

"It helps us to assist our customers to isolate problems. If it is us who is having the problem, then we can use it to streamline the process."

"The ability to troubleshoot customers' connectivity has been very beneficial."

More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG pros

Cons

"The training for this product is not very good and needs to be improved."

"I would like to see better integration with multiple products. Integration is not something that is readily available for most of the products."

"Some of the automated tasks we can perform on QRadar cannot be performed on LogRhythm because the solution has limitations."

"Sometimes it's hard to find the network devices' self-audit logs."

"The platform's integration features often need to be improved."

"There is an issue with tunneling in relation to how the connectivity is established between the end devices and where NetMon is installed. On the console, I often observe that there's a difference of a few seconds or maybe a minute, and this lag time should not be there."

"Could use a topology diagram which would help get an exact visual."

"The main concern is that LogRhythm has not improved NetMon but instead introduced a separate product, which many customers, including us, would prefer to be integrated into a single platform for easier management."

More LogRhythm NetMon cons

"Being able to manage the packet flow switches in nGeniusONE would be great."

"The monitoring and reporting tool needs improvement. Users want more information, such as the level of detail when doing a packet analysis. They want more detail to be able to isolate down to a specific point."

"There is a timeout feature that we have been asking for awhile."

"The technology goes end-of-life on us every year, which is why I am looking forward to vSTREAM. I don't like when devices go end-of-life on us so quickly. If we can get more of an advanced notice of when an end-of-life is brought up, because our certification process within the organization takes a while."

"Only problems that we have had are fiber issues going into the TAPs or vSTREAMs, which are usually local site issues."

"I would like to see an improved level of stitching between IPs."

"The NetFlow Collectors could handle more flows per minute."

"We don't use the single pane of glass view, even though we own it."

More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is expensive for smaller companies."

"LogRhythm's licensing part is something that depends on the license you want since they offer it on a perpetual and subscription basis."

"Pricing is okay. There were some competitors that were extremely expensive and there were some which were really inexpensive but LogRhythm stayed in the middle of them."

"I don't have visibility into the pricing of LogRhythm NetMon as it's handled through our commercial partnerships."

"The price of this solution is too high, so it should be made more practical and more valuable for the customer."

"NetMon's licensing costs about $85k per year, with some extra costs for support."

"This product could be cheaper."

"It can be scalable. It just costs too much. With a company as big as ours, it gets too expensive to accommodate every single site."

"To capture more with the solution that we bought, you have to buy another InfiniStreamNG, and there are only four ports in the back."

"The price is a little high."

"I would like it to be more scalable with less spend."

"The scalability is good, but it comes at a cost. E.g., if you need 100 InfiniStream because you are sending gigs or terabytes of data to one InfiniStream, then you will have to purchase another InfiniStream, which are not cheap."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

22%

Government

10%

Insurance Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

11%

Energy/Utilities Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about LogRhythm NetMon?

It has a very strong artificial intelligence engine.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LogRhythm NetMon?

I don't have visibility into the pricing of LogRhythm NetMon as it's handled through our commercial partnerships.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LogRhythm NetMon?

The main concern is that LogRhythm has not improved NetMon but instead introduced a separate product, which many customers, including us, would prefer to be integrated into a single platform for ea...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SCOM vs LogRhythm NetMon

Compared 52% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs LogRhythm NetMon

Compared 48% of the time

More LogRhythm NetMon Competitors

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 35% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 29% of the time

Riverbed NPM+ vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 19% of the time

cPacket cClear vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 17% of the time

More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

LogRhythm NetMon

April 2025

Download LogRhythm NetMon product report

Buyer's Guide

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

April 2025

Download NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG product report

Also Known As

LogRhythm Network Monitor

InfiniStreamNG, NETSCOUT ISNG, Infinistream

Overview

Identify Emerging Threats on Your Network in Real Time

Transform your physical or virtual system into a network forensics sensor in a matter of minutes for free with LogRhythm's NetMon Freemium. Your investigations will come together effortlessly with extensive corresponding metadata, full packet capture, and customizable advanced correlation.. Detect network-based threats with real-time network monitoring and big data analytics

Get the visibility you need with NetMon.

LogRhythm

NETSCOUT’s new ISNG platform harnesses the power of IP intelligence by mining traffic in real-time to deliver accurate and actionable data for service assurance, cybersecurity and business intelligence applications. The InfiniStreamNG platform fully supports the nGeniusONE and Iris application suites.

NETSCOUT

Sample Customers

Sera-Brynn

U.S. Department of Defense

Buyer's Guide

LogRhythm NetMon vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

April 2025

Free Report: LogRhythm NetMon vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Find out what your peers are saying about LogRhythm NetMon vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our LogRhythm NetMon vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.