LogRhythm NetMon vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG comparison

LogRhythm and NETSCOUT are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. LogRhythm is ranked #56 with an average rating of 7.7, while NETSCOUT is ranked #78. LogRhythm holds a 0.3% mindshare in NMS, compared to NETSCOUT’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of LogRhythm users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of NETSCOUT users who would recommend it.

LogRhythm NetMon

Read 11 LogRhythm NetMon reviews

564 Views
266 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Read 13 NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG reviews

546 Views
273 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

LogRhythm NetMon

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

LogRhythm NetMon and NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG compete in the network monitoring space, with NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG having the upper hand due to its comprehensive features offering greater value for the price.

Features: LogRhythm NetMon offers intuitive navigation, real-time network monitoring, and effective anomaly detection. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG provides deep packet inspection, extensive data analysis capabilities, and a robust security solution.

Room for Improvement: LogRhythm NetMon could enhance its data analysis features, expand on its current security measures, and improve its integration with third-party tools. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG might streamline its deployment process, refine its user interface for ease of use, and reduce the learning curve associated with its advanced features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LogRhythm NetMon is straightforward to deploy and known for responsive customer service, enhancing user satisfaction. In contrast, NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG may require expert assistance during deployment but offers a comprehensive support system post-deployment.

Pricing and ROI: LogRhythm NetMon's initial setup costs are accessible, offering quick ROI for budget-focused organizations. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG, while having higher setup costs, targets long-term ROI due to its rich feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed LogRhythm NetMon vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

LogRhythm NetMon vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LogRhythm NetMon

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

56th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

78th

Average Rating

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of LogRhythm NetMon is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

KeithGalleros

Information Security Analyst at Detecon Al Saudia Company Limited

A solution providing visibility into all data traversing your network but needs to be more cost-efficient

The main concern is that LogRhythm has not improved NetMon but instead introduced a separate product, which many customers, including us, would prefer to be integrated into a single platform for easier management. I'd also like to see LogRhythm NetMon improve in terms of cost efficiency, especially regarding adding new products that may overlap in functionality. Specifically, I would appreciate enhanced detection and response capabilities directly integrated into NetMon to avoid needing additional rules or tools from LogRhythm. Regarding integration capabilities, I think NetMon's current agent-based approach is limiting. Integrating with protocols like Gflow and Netflow would be better, allowing seamless integration with our existing network equipment. This would solve the problem of agent-based restrictions and improve overall integration.

Read full review

Michael Gideon Genita

Associate System Engineer at SMS Global Technologies, Inc.

Easy to set up with good documentation and helpful support

I'm using it for a customer The packet flow switch is the most valuable aspect of the solution. It's an easy product to set up. We can scale the solution if we need to. It's stable. The documentation is well-written and quite useful. It's compatible with other products. Under the pocket flow…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"NetMon's best feature is traffic analysis."

"The protocols with which you see the traffic for a particular website that a client has in their environment, for example, are valuable. We can monitor whether the traffic is up to the mark or whether they need to add more bandwidth. Also, we can see if we're able to get real-time environment data as well. The customization dashboard is really good. LogRhythm NetMon has its own in-built dashboards which are helpful in guiding customization."

"The most valuable feature is the log, which can be analyzed by our SIEM solution."

"The initial setup is straightforward because we can deploy an open server."

"LogRhythm NetMon's most impressive feature is that it's a bundled package, so you're not just relying on monthly data; you get a six-month view for more comprehensive indicators of compromise. This dual approach is precious. We implement LogRhythm NetMon in our cybersecurity strategy mainly for compliance and correlation of network, user, and decision activities, particularly for network firewalls and access control."

"The analytics feature is the most valuable feature."

"Visibility is a valuable feature, the ability to see even if the traffic is not going into the firewall"

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

More LogRhythm NetMon pros

"It is very rock solid. We hardly have any hardware issues."

"It helps us to assist our customers to isolate problems. If it is us who is having the problem, then we can use it to streamline the process."

"The ability to troubleshoot customers' connectivity has been very beneficial."

"The most valuable features are speed and cost."

"It has cut our troubleshooting down by days. Once we have a product in place, we show people examples of how it can streamline their troubleshooting process."

"It allows us to get quicker resolutions. We can see exactly what is using up the bandwidth, so we can assist end users."

"It's an easy product to set up."

"I love the single pane of glass view. It makes it easier to not have to navigate everywhere. It allows more simplistic visibility, without having to go from tool to tool to tool, or from window to window to window."

More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG pros

Cons

"LogRhythm NetMon's pricing model is an area of concern that should be made a little bit cheaper in comparison to the other players in the market currently."

"I would like to see better integration with multiple products. Integration is not something that is readily available for most of the products."

"The platform's integration features often need to be improved."

"Sometimes it's hard to find the network devices' self-audit logs."

"Some of the automated tasks we can perform on QRadar cannot be performed on LogRhythm because the solution has limitations."

"There is an issue with tunneling in relation to how the connectivity is established between the end devices and where NetMon is installed. On the console, I often observe that there's a difference of a few seconds or maybe a minute, and this lag time should not be there."

"The main concern is that LogRhythm has not improved NetMon but instead introduced a separate product, which many customers, including us, would prefer to be integrated into a single platform for easier management."

"The training for this product is not very good and needs to be improved."

More LogRhythm NetMon cons

"The NetFlow Collectors could handle more flows per minute."

"I would like to see an improved level of stitching between IPs."

"Being able to manage the packet flow switches in nGeniusONE would be great."

"The scalability has some limitations and quirks to it. I would like to be able to upgrade rather than replace the whole thing."

"Only problems that we have had are fiber issues going into the TAPs or vSTREAMs, which are usually local site issues."

"The stability depends on who is using the tool, because you only can get as much out of the tool as you put into it. There are a lot of patches for this particular environment, so you have to keep on them. If you lose track of them, then the product is not useful anymore."

"The monitoring and reporting tool needs improvement. Users want more information, such as the level of detail when doing a packet analysis. They want more detail to be able to isolate down to a specific point."

"I'd like them to make the product more user-friendly."

More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is okay. There were some competitors that were extremely expensive and there were some which were really inexpensive but LogRhythm stayed in the middle of them."

"LogRhythm's licensing part is something that depends on the license you want since they offer it on a perpetual and subscription basis."

"The price of this solution is too high, so it should be made more practical and more valuable for the customer."

"The product is expensive for smaller companies."

"I don't have visibility into the pricing of LogRhythm NetMon as it's handled through our commercial partnerships."

"NetMon's licensing costs about $85k per year, with some extra costs for support."

"To capture more with the solution that we bought, you have to buy another InfiniStreamNG, and there are only four ports in the back."

"This product could be cheaper."

"I would like it to be more scalable with less spend."

"The scalability is good, but it comes at a cost. E.g., if you need 100 InfiniStream because you are sending gigs or terabytes of data to one InfiniStream, then you will have to purchase another InfiniStream, which are not cheap."

"The price is a little high."

"It can be scalable. It just costs too much. With a company as big as ours, it gets too expensive to accommodate every single site."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

19%

Insurance Company

11%

Government

11%

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Energy/Utilities Company

10%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about LogRhythm NetMon?

It has a very strong artificial intelligence engine.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LogRhythm NetMon?

I don't have visibility into the pricing of LogRhythm NetMon as it's handled through our commercial partnerships.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LogRhythm NetMon?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SCOM vs LogRhythm NetMon

Compared 31% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs LogRhythm NetMon

Compared 20% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs LogRhythm NetMon

Compared 17% of the time

Niagara Visibility Controller vs LogRhythm NetMon

Compared 17% of the time

Ixia CloudLens vs LogRhythm NetMon

Compared 15% of the time

More LogRhythm NetMon Competitors

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 29% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 26% of the time

Riverbed NPM+ vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 18% of the time

cPacket cClear vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 16% of the time

NIKSUN NetVCR vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 12% of the time

More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

LogRhythm NetMon

June 2025

Download LogRhythm NetMon product report

Buyer's Guide

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

June 2025

Download NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG product report

Also Known As

LogRhythm Network Monitor

InfiniStreamNG, NETSCOUT ISNG, Infinistream

Overview

Identify Emerging Threats on Your Network in Real Time

Transform your physical or virtual system into a network forensics sensor in a matter of minutes for free with LogRhythm's NetMon Freemium. Your investigations will come together effortlessly with extensive corresponding metadata, full packet capture, and customizable advanced correlation.. Detect network-based threats with real-time network monitoring and big data analytics

Get the visibility you need with NetMon.

LogRhythm

NETSCOUT’s new ISNG platform harnesses the power of IP intelligence by mining traffic in real-time to deliver accurate and actionable data for service assurance, cybersecurity and business intelligence applications. The InfiniStreamNG platform fully supports the nGeniusONE and Iris application suites.

NETSCOUT

Sample Customers

Sera-Brynn

U.S. Department of Defense

Buyer's Guide

LogRhythm NetMon vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

June 2025

Free Report: LogRhythm NetMon vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Find out what your peers are saying about LogRhythm NetMon vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our LogRhythm NetMon vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.