Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Logpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
8.1
Logpoint ensures compliance, offers cost-effectiveness and predictable pricing, and boosts ROI, providing value in security operations.
Sentiment score
1.0
WithSecure Elements EDR provided significant ROI by reducing response times, minimizing malware impact, and enhancing endpoint visibility and integration.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.4
Logpoint's customer service experiences response delays and varied technical support, with language barriers and stretched local representatives noted.
Sentiment score
1.0
WithSecure Elements EDR support is mixed, with issues like delays and false positives, but some users find it stable.
The technical support for Logpoint is very good, and I would rate it as nine out of ten.
Logpoint's customer support is not sufficient with only one engineer in the US.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Logpoint offers exceptional scalability, adaptability, and modularity, supporting growth for small to medium enterprises with robust architecture.
Sentiment score
10.0
WithSecure Elements EDR is scalable, catering to various organizational sizes with flexible licensing and proven effectiveness across users.
It is web-based and accommodates the expansion of our organization.
Logpoint is scalable and capable of expanding.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.6
Logpoint generally maintains stability but can face issues due to hardware dependency and resource allocation, improving with newer versions.
Sentiment score
7.5
WithSecure Elements EDR is stable and reliable with occasional issues like high resource usage and cloud dashboard slowdowns.
I have received reports indicating glitches and downtimes with Logpoint.
The system is stable with WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response.
 

Room For Improvement

Logpoint requires better integration, usability, performance, documentation, installation processes, cloud capabilities, support, and threat management features.
WithSecure Elements needs improvements in false positives, mobile usability, reporting, RAM usage, pricing, and clearer documentation.
Dealing with foreign entities for support was a challenge, leading us to switch providers due to lack of adequate support.
Logpoint needs to be cloud-native, as currently, it is not.
 

Setup Cost

Logpoint offers a cost-effective subscription model with fixed pricing, though advanced consulting fees could increase overall costs.
WithSecure Elements pricing is competitive and justified by capabilities, though value perceptions vary among enterprise buyers.
I rate the pricing at eight, suggesting it's relatively good or affordable.
 

Valuable Features

Logpoint offers cost-effective log management with advanced analytics, seamless integrations, and user-friendly SIEM and SOAR features.
WithSecure Elements provides encrypted drive access, unified endpoint management, antivirus, EDR, system updates, stability, scalability, and competitive pricing.
The UEBA enables us to monitor at the device level, and SOAR provides playbooks and templates that we can modify and incorporate into the platform.
It effectively facilitates logging and log storage and assists in security event management by ingesting security events.
 

Categories and Ranking

Logpoint
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
42nd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (36th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (30th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (11th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (18th)
WithSecure Elements Endpoin...
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
44th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.6
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (31st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Logpoint is 0.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
 

Featured Reviews

Abdullah Secca - PeerSpot reviewer
Valuable monitoring and integration features boost compliance
They are not in the US market, and the quality of support has declined. They migrated operations from Boston to Denmark, and we cannot use a tool hosted outside the country. Additionally, dealing with foreign entities for support was a challenge, leading us to switch providers due to lack of adequate support.
Mark Feldman - PeerSpot reviewer
Dashboard offers comprehensive views with efficient system updates and integration
There is one significant issue with WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response. For computers with limited RAM, such as 16 gigabytes, the software is not optimal as it requires between four to six gigabytes of RAM to run. I don't use the Threat Intelligence feature from WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response as it requires extra activation, which I have not implemented.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
865,140 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
28%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
University
6%
Comms Service Provider
22%
Computer Software Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Educational Organization
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LogPoint?
I rate the pricing at eight, suggesting it's relatively good or affordable.
What needs improvement with LogPoint?
Logpoint needs to be cloud-native, as currently, it is not. Additionally, there should be compliance mapping, where the features and actions within Logpoint map to security compliance standards.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F-Secure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response?
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response's licensing costs are yearly.
What needs improvement with F-Secure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response?
There is one significant issue with WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response. For computers with limited RAM, such as 16 gigabytes, the software is not optimal as it requires between fou...
 

Also Known As

No data available
F-Secure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response, F-Secure Rapid Detection and Response, F-Secure RDR
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

AP Pension, Copenhagen Airports, KMD, Terma, DISA, Danish Crown, Durham City Council, Game, TopDanmark, Lahti Energia, Energi Midt, Synoptik, Eissmann Group Automotive, Aligro, CG50...
Blackfin
Find out what your peers are saying about Logpoint vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
865,140 professionals have used our research since 2012.