Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Lattice Performance vs SAP SuccessFactors comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Lattice Performance
Ranking in Talent Management
16th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SAP SuccessFactors
Ranking in Talent Management
1st
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
99
Ranking in other categories
Cloud HCM (1st), Talent Acquisition (2nd), Global Payroll (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Talent Management category, the mindshare of Lattice Performance is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP SuccessFactors is 18.3%, down from 20.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Talent Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
SAP SuccessFactors18.3%
Lattice Performance0.9%
Other80.8%
Talent Management
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2625738 - PeerSpot reviewer
Informal performance reviews and feedback collected effortlessly
What I like is that it's fairly easy to get informal performance reviews. I can use it to have a written data point that is not as formal as my annual or semiannual performance review, however, I can still give feedback and collect data points, and then have them all compiled in the workplace.
ManujGupta - PeerSpot reviewer
Has improved employee satisfaction and streamlined real-time data management
In terms of customizations in specific modules for industry requirements, SAP SuccessFactors is much more generic and does not comply many times with industry requirements as a vertical. In my experience with SuccessFactors' analytics capabilities influencing decision-making, workforce analytics is still challenging due to customizations. It does not provide flexibility in terms of analytics, and we have to customize extensively. For the future of the product, I would like to see more AI implementation, Python integrations, and GPT integrations.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"What I like is that it's fairly easy to get informal performance reviews."
"It is very stable."
"It is a very stable solution."
"The tool has a unique talent management platform."
"The tool is easy to use for performance management. We haven't experienced any issues with SAP SuccessFactors for performance management, which is great. However, since we're still learning to use it fully, we might not utilize all its available features yet."
"Compared to other on-premise solutions, the first advantage of SAP SuccessFactors is that it is a SaaS-based solution."
"The initial setup was pretty simple."
"This solution is very user-friendly, and supports 60 plus languages."
"All of SuccessFactors' features are useful, but there are several modules within SuccessFactors that I find handy. You have Employee Central, which manages employee records within the system. It manages all the information about an employee, including names, addresses, account numbers, positions, org charts, etc. It also handles performance reviews and KPIs for employees within an organization. Then you have succession planning and development as well."
"The overall functionality of the solution is very good."
 

Cons

"I am not really sure what improvements can be made."
"Maybe it could develop a module based on the staffing of resources or something. On the other hand, it's very basic."
"It is not that user-friendly. It can be made more user-friendly."
"The price could be lower."
"One area for improvement is making SuccessFactors more compatible with other countries, especially in terms of payroll and other functionalities."
"SAP should also look into easily integrating with other applications or other tools. Technology has changed now, and it should be easier for any application to integrate with other apps. There needs to be more flexibility."
"The reporting tool is not as good as IBM Cognos which is very, very powerful."
"he user interface could be improved."
"The solution needs more localization, especially for the Middle East and Russia."
"I would like to be able to configure objects from instances, not from import and export files."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"We have a yearly license. There are no additional costs."
"So now, SAP charges me 300 Euros for 14,000 employees. I still have to pay 2,000 euros because I'm using SAP on-prem."
"The solution is on the expensive side but is definitely worth the money."
"Probably, it is one of the priciest products, and is very costly to put up and maintain but because it is a good solution end to end, people take it."
"It could be cheaper."
"Our costs for the solution are subsidized by our parent company, I am not aware of the exact cost because of this. However, we pay $50,000 annually. If we move to another solution it will be more expensive."
"We are on an annual subscription to use SAP SuccessFactors. The pricing model is something that they could restructure a bit better. If it was based differently on the type of usage it would help."
"The price of the solution depends on too many factors to provide an estimate. However, the price of SAP SuccessFactors is competitive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Talent Management solutions are best for your needs.
868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Media Company
9%
University
9%
Educational Organization
7%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business22
Midsize Enterprise13
Large Enterprise69
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Lattice Performance?
I am not really sure what improvements can be made.
What is your primary use case for Lattice Performance?
I mostly use it for submitting performance evaluations and potentially informing my manager about my tasks for the week, as well as having a look at the organizational chart of my company. I might ...
What advice do you have for others considering Lattice Performance?
Actually, I think it's pretty basic. I don't like anything in particular. Maybe it could develop a module based on the staffing of resources or something. I would say it is fit for what it does. On...
What are the biggest differences between Workday, Oracle Cloud and SAP SuccessFactors?
Differences between Workday, Oracle Cloud,w and SAP SuccessFactors:w Oracle: "simple interface and deep customization to suit the purpose." SAP: Multiple functionalities that increase process effi...
What is better, SAP HCM or SAP SuccessFactors?
When it comes to user experience, SuccessFactors is unquestionably superior, as it provides end users with a new experience and an advanced user interface. Additionally, the entire concept of SF is...
What do you like most about SAP SuccessFactors?
The tool is easy to use for performance management. We haven't experienced any issues with SAP SuccessFactors for performance management, which is great. However, since we're still learning to use ...
 

Also Known As

No data available
SuccessFactors
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Webflow, Robinhood, Loom, Udacity, Discord, Article, Intercom, Gusto, Shippo, DemandBase, Linktree, GreenState
City of Cape Town, ADAMA Agricultural Solutions Ltd., TransAlta Corporation, Keolis, PT XL Axiata Tbk, National Football League (NFL), Plan International, Yoh, A Day & Zimmermann Company, China Talent Group (CTG TMO), Umicore S.A., Butterfield Bank, Skril
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Workday, Oracle and others in Talent Management. Updated: October 2025.
868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.