Lano vs Remote comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Lano Logo
341 views|285 comparisons
Remote Logo
597 views|519 comparisons
Ranking
11th
out of 28 in Global Payroll
Views
341
Comparisons
285
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
6th
out of 28 in Global Payroll
Views
597
Comparisons
519
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Deel logo
Compared 27% of the time.
Oyster logo
Compared 15% of the time.
Omnipresent logo
Compared 14% of the time.
Velocity Global logo
Compared 11% of the time.
Atlas logo
Compared 8% of the time.
Learn More
Lano
Video Not Available
Overview

Employ the best talent anywhere in the world, without an entity. Automate global payments for all employee types. Consolidate payroll for multiple entities on a single screen.

International payroll, benefits, taxes, and compliance for businesses, big and small. Whether you’re looking to offer new solutions to your customers or building a more seamless process for your own team, our powerful API empowers you to easily connect your people and payroll data across the entire HR tech stack.

Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Retailer20%
Financial Services Firm14%
University8%
Computer Software Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company17%
Comms Service Provider8%
University8%
Construction Company8%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise61%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business33%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise57%

Lano is ranked 11th in Global Payroll while Remote is ranked 6th in Global Payroll. Lano is rated 0.0, while Remote is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Lano is most compared with Deel, whereas Remote is most compared with Deel, Oyster, Omnipresent, Velocity Global and Atlas.

See our list of best Global Payroll vendors.

We monitor all Global Payroll reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.