No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Kore.ai vs PolyAI comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Kore.ai
Ranking in AI Customer Support
2nd
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
AI Agent Builders (7th), AI Customer Experience Personalization (7th), AI Security (7th), AI IT Support (7th)
PolyAI
Ranking in AI Customer Support
13th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Conversation Intelligence Software (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the AI Customer Support category, the mindshare of Kore.ai is 1.9%, down from 19.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PolyAI is 1.0%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AI Customer Support Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Kore.ai1.9%
PolyAI1.0%
Other97.1%
AI Customer Support
 

Featured Reviews

Judin Augustin - PeerSpot reviewer
Associate Data Scientist at Guide House
Automation has reduced large call centers and provides real-time outbound support for patients
Kore.ai is a low-code platform, and you do not necessarily have to be an expert in artificial intelligence or generative AI to use this platform. However, if you have that experience, it will be a valuable add-on. The main advantage is that it has almost every kind of plugin available to use, whether for live agents or if you want to use it as a call center. You have real-time capabilities and the most useful plugins available, with almost every kind of model available with configurations. We can configure the ML models and train them. The platform is very user-friendly with explanatory features and a great UI. One significant feature is the live testing platform with Kore.ai. When you are creating a workflow, you have an interactive, real-time testing platform that reflects every change you make. This makes it easy to debug errors or add new features. Additionally, Kore.ai has many different tools and platforms that cater to different needs, whether for a call center, normal workflow, or machine learning workflow, which is really useful. Because of Kore.ai, it was much easier than creating something manually. A low-code platform always helps, and when that platform has this much capability, it provides far more value than manual development. It was particularly helpful for our team that we could create a POC and get that project into production. Kore.ai helped our team build a generative AI outbound calling chatbot, and it truly helped our customers. If you have a hospital with a thousand employees in a call center, you might consider outsourcing. However, with Kore.ai's outbound calling capabilities, you can eliminate the outsourcing part. You do not need a thousand call center employees. You can accomplish this through automation with just one or two employees if people need to switch to agents. This represented a significant cost reduction.
Harman Singh - PeerSpot reviewer
Devops Manager at Microsoft Ai
Automation has reduced routine inquiries while agents have gained time for complex issues
The best features PolyAI offers include its professional service as a software approach, which is a significant differentiator during initial onboarding, with the structured questionnaire process capturing our architecture, security constraints, brand voice, and API handshakes down the wire. They work instead of handling a raw, self-serve bot builder, allowing our platform engineers to avoid constant babysitting while PolyAI's dialogue engineers handle model fine-tuning, edge case routing, and continuous optimization. I also appreciate the low-latency, human-parity voice system, which helps the voice agent handle non-linear speech, sudden conversational pivots, background noise, and mid-sentence interruptions naturally, making audio latency practically imperceptible and eliminating the awkward pauses typical to traditional conversational IVRs. This is a game-changer. Finally, I appreciate how moving between chats and voice maintains context seamlessly, as conversations trigger or fallback or human handoff. State payloads transfer cleanly with zero loss of session context. The low-latency and human-parity voice system make a significant difference for our team, ensuring that interactions between AI and humans do not sound robotic. This capability makes the AI's responses clear, without context lagging or hallucination. Our end user experience has positively increased by 23.5%. Earlier, latency posed a challenge, but low latency ensures that we can achieve our end goals efficiently. The governance and security of PolyAI is really strong. It has not missed anything in terms of governance and AI, which I feel has been handled really well. The accuracy and reliability of PolyAI's AI output is exceptional, more than 200%, since it does not hallucinate, provides long answers without losing context, and utilizes low latency and advanced AI models. They have done a good job in this aspect.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The best feature of Kore.ai is that it is a cost-saving tool because when we use IVR, we have to assign agents at the backend, but using Kore.ai, we can automate all of those functions."
"Kore.ai has positively impacted my organization by being a big money saver because before having our chatbot, the use case was that every time some of our customers needed help, they used to call a number."
"Kore.ai has positively impacted my organization, as it saved a lot of time in implementation and the proof of concept was very fast to implement and easy to develop."
"Compared to other tools, Kore.ai provides a well-organized chatbot experience that others do not offer."
"Kore.ai is outstanding compared to other AI agent platforms such as Copilot Studio due to the centralized nature and integration of different apps within a single platform."
"Kore.ai helped us integrate a lot through documentation and trial and error, making it straightforward to integrate overall, resulting in a very good experience for first-timers."
"Kore.ai has positively impacted my organization by helping us build intelligent chatbots and incorporating voice agents, enabling various clients to adopt these solutions, which have been revolutionary for their businesses."
"Kore.ai has positively impacted our organization by reducing error rates from around fifteen to twenty percent to just two to three percent after implementation."
"The low-latency and human-parity voice system make a significant difference for our team, ensuring that interactions between AI and humans do not sound robotic."
"Overall, PolyAI has been a great addition to my customer service workflow, and its strong natural language understanding, voice quality, and automation have helped improve efficiency."
 

Cons

"In my experience, Kore.ai is not stable."
"Customer support is where Kore.ai has significant room for improvement. Post-implementation support is a particularly discouraging aspect for me."
"The two points I deduct relate to the integrations, which were not as extensive as I initially expected."
"To improve Kore.ai, I suggest focusing on more agentic automation, such as offering MCP kind of features with an orchestration layer for use cases."
"Customer support is okay, I guess. We get what we want from them whenever there is an issue or something, but sometimes when we had issues, it was delayed a lot."
"In support, the team is not the greatest, but it works."
"Kore.ai can be improved by enhancing their documentation, which is currently a bit disorganized."
"This is a regret for me."
"One area where PolyAI can be improved is in deeper integrations with existing systems and more configuration on how to handle complex scenarios."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Customer Support solutions are best for your needs.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Construction Company
11%
Retailer
8%
Construction Company
24%
Educational Organization
10%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise14
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kore.ai?
The experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing of Kore.ai is that the price is low, and the licensing is also not costly.
What needs improvement with Kore.ai?
Kore.ai could be improved by offering more in-depth trainings and assignments with the platform itself so that anyone could learn how to use it better. We sometimes faced challenges with the integr...
What is your primary use case for Kore.ai?
Kore.ai is designed to create AI chatbots for agents working with clients, integrating agents for their main duties. I completed a personal project using Kore.ai to build an agent for university ad...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PolyAI?
PolyAI's pricing and licensing were competitive for my use case.
What needs improvement with PolyAI?
One area where PolyAI can be improved is in deeper integrations with existing systems and more configuration on how to handle complex scenarios. An area for improvement with PolyAI would be more fl...
What is your primary use case for PolyAI?
My main use case for PolyAI is to build a solution for customer service, particularly automating common queries efficiently. I use PolyAI to handle common customer service calls such as account bal...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Leading banks & Enterprise Companies
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, Kore.ai, Sendbird and others in AI Customer Support. Updated: October 2026.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.