"Now it has an OCR, optical character recognition, engine where it can extract data from the document."
"The comprehensiveness and depth of Integration Servers' connectors to packaged apps and custom apps is unlimited. They have a connector for everything. If they don't, you can build it yourself. Or oftentimes, if there is value for other customers as well, you can talk with webMethods about creating a new adapter for you."
"All of the components are very independent but are tied together to give the business value."
"Operationally, I consider the solution to be quite good."
"One [of the most valuable features] is the webMethods Designer. That helps our developers develop on their own. It's very intuitive for design. It helps our developers to speed the development of services for the integrations."
"The solution's ease-of-use is its most valuable feature, in which complex issues may be resolved."
"Application integrations are offered out-of-the-box, and that is extremely important to us. This is one of the main use cases that we have for it. It is about 60 to 70 percent of the workload in our application today."
"webMethods Integration Server is an easy-to-use solution and does not require a lot of coding."
"The Software AG Designer has been great. It's very intuitive."
"Sometimes there isn't enough accuracy when it comes to extracts."
"A while ago, they were hacked, and it took them a very long time to open their website again in order to download any service packs or any features. I don't know what they could do differently. I know that they were vulnerable, and there was some downtime, but because they were down, we were unable to download any potential service packs."
"On the monitoring side of things, the UI for monitoring could be improved. It's a bit cumbersome to work with."
"Version control is not very easy. The packages and the integration server are on Eclipse IDE, but you can't compare the code from the IDE. For example, if you are working on Java code, doing version control and deployment for a quick comparison between the code isn't easy. Some tools or plug-ins are there, such as CrossVista, and you can also play with an SVN server where you have to place your package, and from there, you can check, but you have to do that as a separate exercise. You can't do it from the IDE or webMethods server. You can't just right-click and upload your service."
"The installation process should be simplified for first time users and be made more user-friendly."
"I'd like to see the admin portal for managing the integration server go up a level, to have more capabilities and to be given a more modern web interface."
"I would like to have a dashboard where I can see all of the communication between components and the configuration."
"The logging capability has room for improvement. That way, we could keep a history of all the transactions. It would be helpful to be able to get to that without having to build a standalone solution to do so."
"The Software AG Designer could be more memory-efficient or CPU-efficient so that we can use it with middle-spec hardware."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Kofax TotalAgility is ranked 6th in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) with 1 review while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 1st in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 19 reviews. Kofax TotalAgility is rated 9.0, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Kofax TotalAgility writes "Easy to set up with great monitoring and lots of built-in features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Its single hybrid-integration platform makes it easy to troubleshoot and quickly resolve issues. Upgrades are complex". Kofax TotalAgility is most compared with ABBYY FlexiCapture, OpenText Intelligent Capture, IBM Datacap, Appian and Camunda Platform, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with Mule ESB, SAP Process Orchestration, IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus and Azure Data Factory.
We monitor all Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
