• Home
  • Kodjin FHIR Server vs. NetApp ONTAP

Kodjin FHIR Server vs NetApp ONTAP comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Edenlab Logo

Kodjin FHIR Server

70 views|30 comparisons
NetApp Logo

NetApp ONTAP

Read 73 NetApp ONTAP reviews
1,018 views|263 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Storage Software
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Kodjin FHIR Server and NetApp ONTAP based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, DataCore, Dell Technologies and others in Storage Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Storage Software Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Kodjin FHIR Server?
Gregg Norton
The on-ramp for all things Netapp
ONTAP itself hasn't really "improved [our] organization", but the Netapp IP that we leverage THROUGH ONTAP is a cornerstone for our data management... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "We save a lot because of the deduplication and compression."
  • "The solution has helped us reduce the overall cost of storage by doing an OPEX agreement with NetApp, we are paying based on utilization. Instead of fronting 30 petabytes worth of storage, we are paying for what we're using."
  • "Recently, we have seen ROI."
  • "They could reduce the price."
  • "It's not an all inclusive model. You have the option to purchase modules to make the entire ecosystem coherent. I would like the option to pay one price and get everything all inclusive, like OnCommand."
  • "The data compression and deduplication have kept us from buying more disks these past three years."
  • "We have been able to save about 3TB to 5TB of storage. We still need to do more on the compression bit, then provisioning, to save more going forward."
  • "The product costs an arm and leg; it's expensive."

    • More NetApp ONTAP Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Storage Software solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    How does Azure NetApp Files compare to NetApp ONTAP?
    Top Answer:Azure NetApp Files is a Microsoft Azure file storage service built on NetApp technology. The platform combines the file capabilities of Azure and NetApp to move critical file-based applications to the… more »
    What do you like most about NetApp ONTAP?
    Top Answer:We do not face any glitches or downtime.
    Read all 70 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp ONTAP?
    Top Answer:The product is a bit expensive. I rate the pricing a five out of ten.
    Read all 28 answers   →
    Ranking
    5th
    out of 6 in Storage Software
    Views
    70
    Comparisons
    30
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    1st
    out of 6 in Storage Software
    Views
    1,018
    Comparisons
    263
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    494
    Rating
    8.6
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Edenlab
    Video Not Available
    NetApp
    Overview

    The Kodjin FHIR Server is smart low-code storage. Available through an FHIR-compliant RESTful API, it offers scalable, cost-effective tools for managing and securing all kinds of healthcare data.

    NetApp is the data authority for hybrid cloud. We provide a full range of hybrid cloud data services that simplify management of applications and data across cloud and on-premises environments to accelerate digital transformation. Together with our partners, we empower global organizations to unleash the full potential of their data to expand customer touchpoints, foster greater innovation and optimize their operations.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    1&1 IONOS, Acıbadem Healthcare Group, Adder Technologies, Aero Vodochody Aerospace
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Healthcare Company11%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Manufacturing Company15%
    Government8%
    Financial Services Firm6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    Storage Software
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, DataCore, Dell Technologies and others in Storage Software. Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Kodjin FHIR Server is ranked 5th in Storage Software while NetApp ONTAP is ranked 1st in Storage Software with 73 reviews. Kodjin FHIR Server is rated 0.0, while NetApp ONTAP is rated 8.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetApp ONTAP writes "The on-ramp for all things Netapp". Kodjin FHIR Server is most compared with , whereas NetApp ONTAP is most compared with DataCore SANsymphony, Azure NetApp Files, Dell PowerPath and StorONE Storage-as-a-Service.

    See our list of best Storage Software vendors.

    We monitor all Storage Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.