Kobiton Mobile Device Testing vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web comparison

Kobiton and OpenText are both solutions in the Mobile App Testing Tools category. Kobiton is ranked #10, while OpenText is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.7. Kobiton holds a 2.1% mindshare in MTT, compared to OpenText’s 5.6% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution.

Kobiton Mobile Device Testing

229 Views
222 Comparison Views

OpenText Functional Testing...

Read 19 OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web reviews

1,471 Views
559 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Kobiton Mobile Device Testing

OpenText Functional Testing...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

OpenText Functional Testing Lab and Kobiton Mobile Device Testing are both designed for mobile and web app testing. OpenText shines in integration and support, while Kobiton leads with mobile-specific features for mobile-first strategies.

Features:OpenText Functional Testing Lab includes broad integration capabilities, support for both mobile and web applications, and a holistic approach to cross-platform testing. Kobiton offers superior mobile testing functionalities, real-device management, and emphasizes mobile-first strategies.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Functional Testing Lab provides a seamless deployment process with comprehensive service packages. Kobiton simplifies deployment with a cloud-based option, minimizing on-premises requirements.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing Lab has a higher initial setup cost, promising substantial ROI through wide-ranging integration. Kobiton offers cost-effective scalable pricing models with strong ROI for mobile testing-focused organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed Mobile App Testing Tools Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Mobile App Testing Tools

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,789 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kobiton Mobile Device Testing

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

10th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Functional Testing...

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

5th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (18th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Mobile App Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Kobiton Mobile Device Testing is 2.1%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is 5.6%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Mobile App Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web	5.6%
Kobiton Mobile Device Testing	2.1%
Other	92.3%

Mobile App Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Use Kobiton Mobile Device Testing?

Leave a review

reviewer2356440

Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Experienced ease in automation with strong support while seeking improvements in low-code options

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers flexibility of deployment, from on-premises to UFT One which is on the cloud. They provide capability for immediate deployment, and assets can be migrated easily. They include enablers specifically for quick migration of test assets. While I have not personally been involved in these migrations, I have observed some clients using it directly while others make a complete shift from OpenText to Tricentis platforms. There have not been many clients moving from OpenText platforms from on-premises to cloud because most shifts have been toward different product categories such as Tricentis altogether.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Non Profit

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I deal with OpenText Analysis Database and Core Performance Engineering, which are categories of software rather than individual pieces. We focus on the ADM area, which includes ALM, UFT One, UFT D...

See all answers

Comparisons

Perfecto vs Kobiton Mobile Device Testing

Compared 36% of the time

AWS Device Farm vs Kobiton Mobile Device Testing

Compared 26% of the time

HeadSpin vs Kobiton Mobile Device Testing

Compared 21% of the time

More Kobiton Mobile Device Testing Competitors

Perfecto vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 7% of the time

Sauce Labs vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 6% of the time

ReadyAPI vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 5% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Mobile App Testing Tools

March 2026

Download Kobiton Mobile Device Testing product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

March 2026

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web report

Download OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center

Overview

Kobiton is a mobile testing platform that accelerates delivery and testing of mobile apps by offering manual and automated testing on real devices, in the cloud or on-premise. Instant access to over 350 real-devices, along with your own private cloud or local lab. Run manual or automated tests, manage your own enterprise device lab or get an instant ‘health-check’ for your app.

Kobiton

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers integration with HPE and non-HPE tools, real device testing, and device management. It supports real-time analytics and multi-platform testing, ensuring traceability and flexibility with decentralized devices.

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is designed to enhance testing efficiency for mobile and desktop applications by allowing ease of integration with different testing environments. It features real-time analytics, supports automated device management, and provides the flexibility of decentralized testing on real devices. With a focus on robust traceability, it stands out as a comprehensive choice for optimizing software development life cycles, especially notable for its ability to support multiple devices simultaneously and strategic scaling through network virtualization and AWS device farm.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing Lab?

Ease of Use: Intuitive interface facilitating user engagement.
Integration: Compatible with HPE and non-HPE tools for improved workflow.
Real Device Testing: Ensures testing on actual devices for accurate results.
Automation: Advanced capabilities streamline repetitive testing.
Device Management: Flexible management of decentralized devices.
Multi-Platform Support: Simultaneous testing across various platforms.
Traceability: Strong application delivery traceability for robust tracking.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Scalability: Ability to handle multiple devices and scale as needed.
Flexibility: Deployment options include both on-premises and cloud-based solutions.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides actionable insights for data-driven decisions.
Enhanced Performance: Optimizes the software development lifecycle.
Comprehensive Testing: Facilitates thorough functional and performance testing.

Financial services companies utilize OpenText Functional Testing Lab for optimizing mobile solutions and applications, ensuring a streamlined integration into their Application Lifecycle Management and Unified Functional Testing processes. It aids in functional and performance testing, adapting to both on-premises and cloud deployments to suit industry-specific demands.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Office Depot, River Island, GreenSky Financial

Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB

Buyer's Guide

Mobile App Testing Tools

March 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, UiPath and others in Mobile App Testing Tools. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Mobile App Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.