Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Klipfolio vs Kyvos comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Klipfolio
Ranking in Reporting
48th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Kyvos
Ranking in Reporting
51st
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
BI (Business Intelligence) Tools (48th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Reporting category, the mindshare of Klipfolio is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kyvos is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Reporting Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Klipfolio0.3%
Kyvos0.6%
Other99.1%
Reporting
 

Featured Reviews

Use Klipfolio?
Leave a review
SN
Business Analyst at Barclays Capital
A stable solution that can be used for data discovery, but it should include more tutorials for new users
We use Kyvos for data discovery and drilling down to the exact data point The most valuable features of Kyvos are reconciliation and its ability to query big data. Since I couldn't find any tutorials or a handbook, I had some initial difficulty understanding the UI and the whole interface of…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Reporting solutions are best for your needs.
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

EMC, Adobe, Intel, Zendesk, Red Hat, Avaya, Google, LinkedIn, Yahoo, Aruba Networks, Trip Advisor, IKEA, Nascar, Deloitte, Aviva, Stihl, Philips, Ericsson, BMW
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Salesforce, IBM and others in Reporting. Updated: March 2026.
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.