I'm not entirely sure about the price and business aspects, but I assume Checkmarx might be less expensive. I think Checkmarx might offer more affordable options, especially in its smaller business version.
Information Security Manager at ITC SOLUCIONES TECNOLOGICAS S.A.S
Real User
Apr 27, 2022
Kiuwan is not as expensive as the other solutions. We pay according to the number of lines of code that have been hired to scan, whether it scans or not. That's the downside.
We can likely find free open-source solutions that give us close to the quality we get with this solution. We'd rather not pay if we don't have to. Customers must pay a yearly licensing fee.
Test Engineer at a tech company with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
Nov 19, 2020
I don't handle the payments or licensing aspects of the solution, therefore, I can't speak to the exact cost of the product. I only administer the tool. That said, it's my understanding that, if you need to analyze more, you do need to pay more for the solution.
Kiuwan offers comprehensive security and vulnerability testing capabilities, focusing on code analysis, fast scanning, and detailed risk assessments. Supporting many technologies, it integrates well into development workflows to ensure code compliance and enhance code quality.Known for its application portfolio governance, Kiuwan provides fast scanning and reporting features, alongside an intuitive interface. It supports languages from COBOL to JavaScript, offering modular capabilities and...
I'm not entirely sure about the price and business aspects, but I assume Checkmarx might be less expensive. I think Checkmarx might offer more affordable options, especially in its smaller business version.
Kiuwan is an open-source solution and free to use.
Kiuwan is not as expensive as the other solutions. We pay according to the number of lines of code that have been hired to scan, whether it scans or not. That's the downside.
We can likely find free open-source solutions that give us close to the quality we get with this solution. We'd rather not pay if we don't have to. Customers must pay a yearly licensing fee.
It follows a subscription model. I think the price is somewhere in the middle.
I don't handle the payments or licensing aspects of the solution, therefore, I can't speak to the exact cost of the product. I only administer the tool. That said, it's my understanding that, if you need to analyze more, you do need to pay more for the solution.
With this solution you only pay for the total amount of lines of code and it's a reasonable cost.
This solution is cheaper than other tools.