Kiuwan Insights vs Mend.io comparison

Kiuwan and Mend.io are both solutions in the Static Code Analysis category. Kiuwan is ranked #23, while Mend.io is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.8. Kiuwan holds a 1.7% mindshare in SCAS, compared to Mend.io’s 4.6% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Mend.io users are willing to recommend the solution.

Kiuwan Insights

Read 2 Kiuwan Insights reviews

482 Views
482 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Mend.io

Read 35 Mend.io reviews

10,080 Views
1,411 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Kiuwan Insights

Mend.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Mend.io and Kiuwan Insights are competitive products in application security and quality management. Kiuwan Insights seems to have the upper hand due to its robust features, offering in-depth analytical capabilities that appeal to those seeking detailed security insights.

Features: Mend.io offers efficient code scanning, integration capabilities, and robust automation that promote adherence to security protocols. Kiuwan Insights provides powerful threat detection, detailed security assessments, and extensive insights into potential vulnerabilities, giving a deeper understanding of security risks.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Mend.io features a straightforward deployment model complemented by highly responsive customer service, which benefits swift integration scenarios. Kiuwan Insights allows for flexible deployment suitable for complex environments, though its customer support may not match Mend.io's responsiveness, which could be critical in time-sensitive implementations.

Pricing and ROI: Mend.io has an accessible pricing structure that enables faster ROI. Kiuwan Insights, while requiring a potentially higher initial investment, provides long-term value through its superior analytical capabilities and feature richness, making it cost-effective for organizations focused on detailed security insights over immediate savings.

To learn more, read our detailed Kiuwan Insights vs. Mend.io Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan Insights vs. Mend.io

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,701 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kiuwan Insights

Ranking in Static Code Analysis

23rd

Average Rating

4.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mend.io

Ranking in Static Code Analysis

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (9th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (5th), Software Supply Chain Security (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Static Code Analysis category, the mindshare of Kiuwan Insights is 1.7%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mend.io is 4.6%, down from 8.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Code Analysis Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Mend.io	4.6%
Kiuwan Insights	1.7%
Other	93.7%

Static Code Analysis

Featured Reviews

Felix Esteban

Head of Development and Consulting at Logalty

Protects problematic libraries; sorely lacking in customer services

Kiuwan lacks decent support, it's very bad. A couple of years ago an American company bought Kiuwan and support became non-existent. It's a big part of why we're looking to move to another product. We have questions regarding false positives and nobody responds to our tickets. They don't have any answers. If you're looking for a cheaper solution and don't require support, it might be okay, but a large end company that has a lot of questions about how the developers are programming will have trouble.

Read full review

meetharoon

CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Centralized security monitoring has reduced false positives and improves dependency governance

The only area for improvement I would say is that the false positives are nearly zero; everything is mostly like 99 to 99.99% or we can say 100% accurate. There were a few areas for improvement just from the last time I saw; I think the user experience had a little problem. We wanted to have certain reports based on our kind of scenario, but the tool did not allow us to create custom reports. We had asked for some facility and some ability for us to create some custom reports. That would be awesome if they allow us to create custom reports the way we wanted. There is one small area which I don't know whether we should call a tool limitation or a wish list; if I use a library and I don't use all the capabilities of the library but only a portion of it and that portion is not vulnerable, but there is a component which is outdated, that is a problem, even though I don't use that component. Mend.io will discover there is a problem in the whole library; that is correct. That's a valid discovery, but in my case, for example, if I don't use that particular portion, then it actually is not making sense for me, but that's not a limitation of Mend.io; I think that's a general problem with any tool in the market because no tool in the market will actually know what portion of the code I'm actually using from that particular library if it is vulnerable or not.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I have found the interface to be perfect."

"Insights is valuable at protecting a problematic library and enabling you to reduce the number of false positives."

"Can help in reducing the number of false positives."

"Our dev team uses the fix suggestions feature to quickly find the best path for remediation."

"Mend has reduced our open-source software vulnerabilities and helped us remediate issues quickly. My company's policy is to ensure that vulnerabilities are fixed before it gets to production."

"The vulnerability analysis is the best aspect of the solution."

"WhiteSource is unique in the scanning of open-source licenses. Additionally, the vulnerabilities aspect of the solution is a benefit. We don't use WhiteSource in the whole organization, but we use it for some projects. There we receive a sense of the vulnerabilities of the open-source components, which improves our security work. The reports are automated which is useful."

"We find licenses together with WhiteSource which are associated with a certain library, then we get a classification of the license. This is with respect to criticality and vulnerability, so we could take action and improve some things, or replace a third-party library which seems to be too risky for us to use on legal grounds."

"I recommend using WhiteSource to other companies if they are in a similar situation that we are."

"The overall support that we receive is pretty good. "

"WhiteSource allowed us to minimize our exposure to open-source vulnerabilities with ease."

More Mend.io pros

Cons

"Kiuwan lacks decent support, it's very bad. A couple of years ago an American company bought Kiuwan and support became non-existent."

"The solution has issues detecting intrusive methods."

"The solution is great, but improvement is needed in the number of lines of code allowed, that is the capacity. Pricing can be improved as well."

"Make the product available in a very stable way for other web browsers."

"I would like to have an additional compliance pack. Currently, it does not have anything for the CIS framework or the NIST framework. If we directly run a scan, and it is under the CIS framework, we can directly tell the auditor that this product is now CIS compliant."

"I rated the solution an eight out of ten because WhiteSource hasn't built in a couple of features that we would have loved to use and they say they're on their roadmap. I'm hoping that they'll be able to build and deliver in 2022."

"WhiteSource needs improvement in the scanning of the containers and images with distinguishing the layers."

"On the reporting side, they could make some improvements. They are making the reports better and better, but sometimes it takes a lot of time to generate a report for our entire organization."

"Some detected libraries do not specify a location of where in the source they were matched from, which is something that should be enhanced to enable quicker troubleshooting."

"It would be good if it can do dynamic code analysis. It is not necessarily in that space, but it can do more because we have too many tools. Their partner relationship support is a little bit confusing. They haven't really streamlined the support process when we buy through a reseller. They should improve their process."

"We specifically use this solution within our CICD pipelines in Azure DevOps, and we would like to have a gate so that if the score falls below a certain value then we can block the pipeline from running."

More Mend.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing can be improved as well."

"Pricing is competitive."

"We always negotiate for the best price possible, and as far as I know, Mend has done an excellent job with their pricing. Our management is happy with the pricing, which has led to renewals."

"Mend is costly but not overly expensive. The license was quite expensive this year, but we managed to negotiate the price down to the same as last year. At the same time, it's a good value. We're getting what we're paying for and still not using all the features. We could probably get more out of the tool and make it more valuable. At the moment, we don't have the capacity to do that."

"The version that we are using, WhiteSource Bolt, is a free integration with Azure DevOps."

"Pricing and licensing are comparable to other tools. When we started, it was less than our existing solution. I can't go into specifics, but it isn't cheap."

"WhiteSource is much more affordable than Veracode."

"This is an expensive solution."

"Over the last two years, they have tried to add more and more features to their license packages, but the price is a little bit high, comparatively."

More Mend.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Code Analysis solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,701 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	22

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does WhiteSource compare with SonarQube?

Red Hat Ceph does well in simplifying storage integration by replacing the need for numerous storage solutions. This solution allows for multiple copies of replicated and coded pools to be kept, ea...

See all answers

How does WhiteSource compare with Black Duck?

We researched Black Duck but ultimately chose WhiteSource when looking for an application security tool. WhiteSource is a software solution that enables agile open source security and license compl...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Mend.io?

Mend.io SCA offers a competitive pricing structure that is relatively affordable compared to similar solutions in the market. This makes it an attractive option for organizations looking to enhance...

See all answers

Comparisons

Veracode vs Kiuwan Insights

Compared 27% of the time

OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs Kiuwan Insights

Compared 25% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Kiuwan Insights

Compared 14% of the time

Klocwork vs Kiuwan Insights

Compared 12% of the time

PyCharm vs Kiuwan Insights

Compared 11% of the time

More Kiuwan Insights Competitors

Black Duck SCA vs Mend.io

Compared 6% of the time

Sonatype Lifecycle vs Mend.io

Compared 5% of the time

SonarQube vs Mend.io

Compared 5% of the time

Veracode vs Mend.io

Compared 5% of the time

Snyk vs Mend.io

Compared 5% of the time

More Mend.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Static Code Analysis

August 2026

Download Kiuwan Insights product report

Buyer's Guide

Mend.io

August 2026

Download Mend.io product report

Also Known As

Insights SCA

WhiteSource, Mend SCA, Mend.io Supply Chain Defender, Mend SAST

Overview

Kiuwan Insights offers cutting-edge security solutions designed to meet the needs of a tech-savvy audience. It empowers organizations to manage vulnerabilities efficiently while ensuring robust protection of software applications.

Kiuwan Insights is a versatile tool that enables IT teams to enhance application security, understand vulnerabilities, and achieve airtight security results. Built with advanced reporting and analytics capabilities, it allows for seamless integration into existing workflows while facilitating real-time risk management and compliance monitoring.

What are the key features of Kiuwan Insights?

Vulnerability Detection: Identifies security gaps in code and recommends fixes.
Code Analysis: Delivers comprehensive insights into code quality and risks.
Integration Capability: Seamlessly integrates with CI/CD pipelines and development tools.
Compliance Management: Ensures adherence to industry standards and regulations.
Real-Time Reporting: Provides instant analysis and detailed reports for informed decision-making.

What ROI or benefits should users look for in reviews?

Increased Security: Improved protection against threats and minimized vulnerabilities.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlined processes leading to time and cost savings.
Regulatory Compliance: Ensures compliance with data security standards.
Enhanced Quality: Better software quality through detailed analysis and reporting.

Implementing Kiuwan Insights in industries such as finance and healthcare allows these sectors to prioritize security due to their sensitive data handling requirements. By adopting its solutions, companies in these industries can significantly forge a pathway to enhanced protection and quality assurance, mitigating risks through tailored security measures.

Kiuwan

Mend.io integrates seamlessly into development environments, providing open-source dependency scanning, CVE detection, and license management to enhance security and efficiency during code development.

Mend.io delivers comprehensive open-source vulnerability detection and remediation, seamlessly integrating with CI/CD workflows. It equips organizations with tools for software composition analysis and license risk detection, efficiently identifying vulnerabilities and managing policies. Mend.io supports a wide array of programming languages and deployment environments while integrating with developer tools like GitHub, Jenkins, and Azure DevOps to enhance security feedback and decision-making. Its ease of use and rapid setup boost efficiency in managing open-source dependencies and reducing vulnerabilities.

What are Mend.io's Key Features?

Open-source dependency scanning: Efficiently scans and identifies vulnerabilities in third-party libraries.
CVE detection: Detects and alerts on potential security risks with granularity.
License management: Manages open-source licenses to ensure compliance and reduce legal risks.
Integration: Works seamlessly with Visual Studio, Azure DevOps, and more.
Fix suggestions: Provides actionable solutions to identified vulnerabilities.
Automated policy management: Enhances security by automating policy adherence.

What Advantages Should be Considered in User Feedback?

Development efficiency: Streamlines workflows to improve code security and quality.
Rapid setup: Minimal time investment required, allowing immediate integration into existing processes.
Extensive language support: Accommodates multiple programming environments, enhancing flexibility.
Robust integration options: Compatible with top development tools, bolstering productivity.

Mend.io empowers industries such as finance, healthcare, and e-commerce by integrating robust open-source security measures within their development cycles, enhancing their ability to address vulnerabilities swiftly and maintain compliance amidst rigorous regulatory standards.

Mend.io

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Microsoft, Autodesk, NCR, Target, IBM, vodafone, Siemens, GE digital, KPMG, LivePerson, Jack Henry and Associates

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan Insights vs. Mend.io

June 2026

Free Report: Kiuwan Insights vs. Mend.io

Find out what your peers are saying about Kiuwan Insights vs. Mend.io and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,701 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kiuwan Insights vs. Mend.io report.

See our list of best Static Code Analysis vendors.

We monitor all Static Code Analysis reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.