Kiuwan Insights vs Klocwork comparison

Kiuwan and Perforce are both solutions in the Static Code Analysis category. Kiuwan is ranked #17, while Perforce is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.4. Kiuwan holds a 0.5% mindshare in SCAS, compared to Perforce’s 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Perforce users are willing to recommend the solution.

Kiuwan Insights

Read 2 Kiuwan Insights reviews

100 Views
53 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Klocwork

Read 23 Klocwork reviews

697 Views
407 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Kiuwan Insights

Klocwork

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Klocwork and Kiuwan Insights are competitive solutions in the software quality assurance sector, focusing on static code analysis. Kiuwan Insights holds an advantage in integration capabilities and flexibility, despite its higher cost, offering valuable features for dynamic environments.

Features: Klocwork offers deep code analysis, customization options, and a comprehensive approach to security audits. It is tailored for environments requiring thorough vulnerability identification. Kiuwan Insights features superior integration with third-party software, supports flexible continuous integration, and provides agile adaptation to diverse development teams.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kiuwan Insights facilitates easy deployment with a cloud-based model, minimizing downtime and enhancing customer support responsiveness. Klocwork, with its on-premises focus, demands more setup time but provides increased control over the deployment environment.

Pricing and ROI: Klocwork incurs higher initial setup costs yet promises long-term ROI through its extensive vulnerability database, making it cost-effective over time. Kiuwan Insights, though more expensive upfront, offers robust features leading to efficient cost savings and delivering quick returns.

To learn more, read our detailed Kiuwan Insights vs. Klocwork Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan Insights vs. Klocwork

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kiuwan Insights

Ranking in Static Code Analysis

17th

Average Rating

4.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Klocwork

Ranking in Static Code Analysis

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (16th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Static Code Analysis category, the mindshare of Kiuwan Insights is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Klocwork is 4.1%, up from 3.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Code Analysis

Featured Reviews

Felix Esteban

Head of Development and Consulting at Logalty

Protects problematic libraries; sorely lacking in customer services

Kiuwan lacks decent support, it's very bad. A couple of years ago an American company bought Kiuwan and support became non-existent. It's a big part of why we're looking to move to another product. We have questions regarding false positives and nobody responds to our tickets. They don't have any answers. If you're looking for a cheaper solution and don't require support, it might be okay, but a large end company that has a lot of questions about how the developers are programming will have trouble.

Read full review

AnirbanSarkar

Head - Solution Management Group at Meteonic Innovation Pvt. Ltd.

Lets you find defects during the development phase, so you don't have to wait till the development is over to find and address flaws

What needs improvement in Klocwork, compared to other products in the market, is the dashboard or reporting mechanisms that need to be a bit more flexible. The Klocwork dashboard could be improved. Though it's good, it's not as good as some of the other products in the market, which is a problem. The reporting could be more detailed and easier to sort out because sorting in Klocwork could be a bit more time-consuming, mainly when sorting defects based on filters, compared to how it's done on other tools such as Coverity. What I'd like added in the next release of Klocwork is the peer code review Cahoots which used to be a part of Klocwork, and the architecture analysis and both have been taken out of Klocwork. I found the two critical for specific deployments, so if those can be brought back to Klocwork, that would be very good.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I have found the interface to be perfect."

"Can help in reducing the number of false positives."

"There is a central Klocwork server at our headquarter in France so we connect the client directly to the server on-premises remotely."

"The reporting helps us understand the trend of our results and whether we improve over time. We can see the history within Klocwork's server architecture and know that we're making things better. It creates a great story for our management. We can demonstrate value and how our software is developing over time."

"The most valuable feature of Klocwork is finding defects while you're doing the coding. For example, if you have an IDE plug-in of Klocwork on Visual Studio or Eclipse, you can find the faults; similar to using spell check on Word, you can find out defects during the development phase, which means that you don't have to wait till the development is over to find the flaws and address the deficiencies. I also find language support in Klocwork good because it used to support only C, C++, C#, and Java, but now, it also supports Java scripts and Python."

"The most valuable feature is the Incremental analysis."

"The most valuable feature of Klocwork is its reduced setup time."

"Technical support is quite good."

"The best advantage of Klocwork is the reduced setup time."

"I like not having to dig through false positives. Chasing down a false positive can take anywhere from five minutes for a small easy one, then something that is complicated and goes through a whole bunch of different class cases, and it can take up to 45 minutes to an hour to find out if it is a false positive or not."

More Klocwork pros

Cons

"The solution is great, but improvement is needed in the number of lines of code allowed, that is the capacity. Pricing can be improved as well."

"The solution has issues detecting intrusive methods."

"Klocwork has to improve its features to stay ahead of other free solutions."

"There are too many warnings, and it requires expertise to determine the correct category for them."

"The main problem is that since it only parses the code, the warnings or the problems that are given as a result of the report can sometimes require a lot of effort to analyze."

"We bought Klocwork, but it was limited to one little program, but the program is now sort of failing. So, we have a license for usage on a program that is sort of failing, and we really can't use the license on anything else."

"Klocwork sometimes provides too many additional warnings which require expertise to manage."

"Klocwork does have a problem with true positives. It only found 30% of true positives in the Juliet test case."

"Now the only issue we have is that whenever we need to get the code we have to build it first. Then we can get the report."

"I believe it should support more languages, such as Python and JavaScript."

More Klocwork cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing can be improved as well."

"When it comes to licensing, the solution has two packages, one for a fixed and the other for a floating server, with the former being more cost effective than the latter."

"Klocwork is still tight on their licensing. If Klocwork would loosen up on the licensing, and where the license could be used, and how many different programs could be run on it, then we have several development programs that I would love to be able to use it for going forward."

"Klocwork should not to be quite so heavy handed on the licensing for very specific programs."

"There are other solutions on the market such as Microsoft Visual Studio. They have been adding more static code analysis features that come for free. It is getting better all the time. That is one of the possibilities is that we've been considering that we may stop using the Klocwork because it doesn't give us any added value."

"This solution offers competitive pricing."

"The limitation that we have is that Klocwork is licensed to certain programs, and if you want to license them to other programs, you have to pay more money."

"Licensing fees are paid annually, but they also have a perpetual license."

"The pricing for Klocwork is very competitive if you compare it from apple to apple. It has competitive pricing regarding the licensing model and the per-license cost. Klocwork isn't a high-end investment for anyone deploying it; even SMBs can afford it. The Klocwork cost per user would depend on the license type, so I'm unable to mention a ballpark figure because it would depend on the type of installation and how the deployment will be, and the nodes to give an accurate calculation or figure. The total price depends on the package, so my company could never publish pricing for Klocwork on the website. My team first collects information from potential clients on the deployment scenario, project environment, etc., before suggesting a package for Klocwork. My rating for Klocwork in terms of pricing is a five because of its flexible license models. There's a license model for every type of organization, whether small, midsize, or enterprise, so it's a five out of five for me."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Code Analysis solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Educational Organization

32%

Manufacturing Company

21%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Klocwork?

It's integrated into our CI, continuous integration.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Klocwork?

Klocwork was competitively priced, making it a cost-effective solution for us.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Klocwork?

We would like Klocwork to connect to Git and notify developers of issues tied to specific commits. Currently, this feature is absent, but we have suggested it to the team.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Klocwork

Compared 36% of the time

Coverity vs Klocwork

Compared 30% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs Klocwork

Compared 13% of the time

Parasoft SOAtest vs Klocwork

Compared 3% of the time

Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs Klocwork

Compared 3% of the time

More Klocwork Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Static Code Analysis

March 2025

Download Kiuwan Insights product report

Buyer's Guide

Klocwork

April 2025

Download Klocwork product report

Also Known As

Insights SCA

No data available

Overview

Kiuwan Insights supports the continuity and integrity of open source management with a complete multi-technology solution that seamlessly integrates with key SDLC tools.

With Kiuwan Insights, you can identify and manage:

vulnerabilities,

compliance, and

operational risk

that may arise from using open source components.

Open source components are a significant and important part of commercial software today. Yet the use of these components introduces the risk of security vulnerabilities, as well as a need to ensure proper licensing and adherence to policies.

Automation is an essential strategy for detection of open source components and security vulnerabilities, compliance analysis, and policy enforcement.

Kiuwan

Klocwork detects security, safety, and reliability issues in real-time by using this static code analysis toolkit that works alongside developers, finding issues as early as possible, and integrates with teams, supporting continuous integration and actionable reporting.

Perforce

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

ACCESS Co Ltd, Risk-AI, Winbond Electronics, Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute, University of Southern California, Alebra Technologies, SIMULIA, Risk Management Solutions, Brigham Young University, SRD, HRL

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan Insights vs. Klocwork

April 2025

Free Report: Kiuwan Insights vs. Klocwork

Find out what your peers are saying about Kiuwan Insights vs. Klocwork and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kiuwan Insights vs. Klocwork report.

See our list of best Static Code Analysis vendors.

We monitor all Static Code Analysis reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.