Kentico vs SharePoint comparison

Kentico and Microsoft are both solutions in the Web Content Management category. Kentico is ranked #17, while Microsoft is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.2. Kentico holds a 2.3% mindshare in WCM, compared to Microsoft’s 6.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Kentico users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 79% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Kentico

Read 2 Kentico reviews

1,129 Views
858 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SharePoint

Read 166 SharePoint reviews

16,578 Views
3,150 Comparison Views

79% willing to recommend

Kentico

SharePoint

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Kentico and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Web Content Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Kentico vs. SharePoint Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Kentico vs. SharePoint

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 899,204 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kentico

Ranking in Web Content Management

17th

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Digital Experience Platforms (DXP) (19th)

SharePoint

Ranking in Web Content Management

2nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

166

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Content Management (1st), Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) (1st), Enterprise Intranet (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Web Content Management category, the mindshare of Kentico is 2.3%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SharePoint is 6.9%, down from 12.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Content Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SharePoint	6.9%
Kentico	2.3%
Other	90.8%

Web Content Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer1384113

President at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

Flexible, offers helpful web templates, and has good connectivity with third-party applications

Kentico is one of the top solutions on the magic quadrant. Currently, all of the development that we do, we hard-code ourselves. We don't use local development frameworks for other systems. We are looking to expand our use of Kentico by adding no-code or low-code products for rapid development. My advice for anybody who is implementing Kentico is that if they are transitioning into it then be sure to use a phased approach. Don't try to migrate everything right away. I suggest doing it over time and become familiar with the system. If it is only one site then it will not be too difficult, but normally, there are multiple sites. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Ravi Raushan Kumar

Software Engineer at ValueMomentum

Centralized document governance has boosted collaboration and made knowledge sharing structured

SharePoint is a powerful platform, but there are a few areas where I think it could be improved, such as user experience. For new users, the interface and navigation can feel quite complex, specifically when working with multiple sites and document libraries. Another improvement would be search functionalities. While it is good sometimes, it does not always return the most relevant result unless a document is very well-structured and tagged. Also, initial setup and customizations can be time-consuming and may require technical expertise, specifically when configuring workflows or permissions. From a modern development perspective, tighter and more seamless integrations with tools including Power Automate and better support for custom backend integrations through APIs could make it more efficient. Overall, simplifying usability and enhancing search and integration capability would make SharePoint even stronger. One additional area I would appreciate improvement would be performance and responsiveness, especially when dealing with a large document library. Sometimes loading or navigating through large datasets can feel quite slow. Another aspect is permissions management. While it is very powerful, it can become complex to manage at scale, specifically when there are multiple levels of access across teams and projects. Improving developer experience would also be beneficial. Making customization, API integrations, and extensions more straightforward would help teams, especially backend developers, leverage SharePoint more efficiently.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I would say they have a modern, flexible, agile content management system."

"It has helped us establish our business in the USA and allows us to work with a range of corporate clients."

"The most valuable features are its integration capabilities and advanced marketing suite."

"Kentico is a very stable and mature system; it's one of the best on the market."

"It's very high, I can't disclose exact figures, but it's a seven-figure number."

"The complete granularity of being able to apply permissions at collection, site, library, list, folder, and doc set levels give ultimate flexibility."

"Single window information sharing."

"It helped us manage our documents and records effectively and at a reasonable cost."

"It is a good tool that makes managing projects and teams much easier, with all documents and calendars in one central location."

"The most valuable features to our organization are the ability to store and share documents across the entire corporation, and the ability to use workflows."

"Outstanding support on SharePoint, in particular from Microsoft."

"It is well supported by Microsoft."

More SharePoint pros

Cons

"They don't have a lot of libraries, which is something that they can improve on."

"This product needs an out of the box Intranet/Extranet Solution."

"The technical support level is practically nil."

"For new users, the interface and navigation can feel quite complex, specifically when working with multiple sites and document libraries."

"There's room for improvement in the search functionality, although it has matured significantly over the years."

"The initial setup process is not intuitive."

"Advise users to update the content."

"It is not really better; we use the same solution as before with Google Drive and the Google App solution."

"SharePoint Online could improve the user interface and when modifying any of the user interfaces can be challenging. Additionally, there are challenges with the detail in the analytics user interface and the overall customization could improve."

"Better collaboration, and team sites (social flavour) mobile enabled More and improved integration capabilities into the eco-system of solutions available."

More SharePoint cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing fees are probably about $100,000 USD per year."

"The solution's pricing is relatively expensive because it's bundled with other products."

"The data classification and search elements are cheap."

"Any extended support from Microsoft is expensive."

"We have purchased add-ons to handle multiple site collections, form creation, and design."

"The pricing works for us."

"The platform has medium pricing."

"The pricing is competitive."

More SharePoint pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Content Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

899,204 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user8925

Developer with 51-200 employees

Aug 23, 2013

Jive vs Sharepoint vs Drupal Commons

At Mediacurrent we often get requests to compare Drupal to other platforms used for intranet sites and social business platforms (like https://dev.twitter.com/ for example). This is often referred to as “Social Business Software”, which has grown in popularity in recent years. I decided to do a…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Government

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	80
Midsize Enterprise	40
Large Enterprise	83

Questions from the Community

Does Kentico provide good options for marketing?

Absolutely! I can't stress enough how important marketing is for the digital experience you're giving to customers. If you want to reach your clients through multiple channels, each type of content...

See all answers

What is the content management system of Kentico like?

In my experience, Kentico has been a very flexible and easy-to-use content management system. Keep in mind that we haven't been using it for a while because our management decided to change DXPs fo...

See all answers

What do you use Kentico for?

Hello, I think Kentico will serve you well as a digital experience platform and especially for commerce purposes. We at my company have been using this feature of the DXP as well because we recentl...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SharePoint?

I do not know the difference between the prices of the two solutions; I did not work on this project.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SharePoint?

It is a little difficult to name the areas for improvements in SharePoint because I don't use it all that much. I know I can host pages on it and feel that the CMS platform, which helps create thos...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SharePoint?

SharePoint is a repository that I use primarily for collaboration and sharing resources and assets. It's a good way to collaborate, and one benefit of SharePoint is the pages you can create on it, ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Drupal vs Kentico

Compared 27% of the time

Adobe Experience Manager vs Kentico

Compared 13% of the time

Crownpeak Digital Experience Management vs Kentico

Compared 10% of the time

Liferay Digital Experience Platform vs Kentico

Compared 9% of the time

More Kentico Competitors

OpenText Documentum Content Management vs SharePoint

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Content Management vs SharePoint

Compared 4% of the time

Box vs SharePoint

Compared 4% of the time

IBM FileNet vs SharePoint

Compared 3% of the time

Alfresco vs SharePoint

Compared 3% of the time

More SharePoint Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Web Content Management

May 2026

Download Kentico product report

Buyer's Guide

SharePoint

May 2026

Download SharePoint product report

Also Known As

No data available

SharePoint 2007, SharePoint 2010

Overview

Kentico is a comprehensive digital experience platform designed for enterprises seeking scalable web solutions. It offers rich capabilities enabling users to build and manage engaging websites and digital experiences.

Kentico empowers users with flexible and integrated capabilities ideal for content management, digital marketing, and e-commerce. Its customizable architecture helps businesses streamline processes and deliver tailored experiences. With robust security and performance features, it supports enterprises in driving successful digital strategies. Notable for its ease of integration with existing systems, Kentico is adaptable for businesses aiming to optimize their outreach and engagement.

What are Kentico's most valuable features?

Content Management: Streamlined workflows and user-friendly tools for optimal content creation and management.
Digital Marketing: Comprehensive tools for running personalized campaigns and tracking customer journeys.
E-commerce: Integration capabilities to enhance online retail operations with a flexible commerce engine.
Security: Advanced security features to guard against threats and ensure data protection.
Scalability: Designed to grow with businesses, accommodating increased traffic and expanding needs.

What benefits and ROI aspects should reviews emphasize?

Increased Efficiency: Streamlines processes, reducing time and resources spent on managing digital experiences.
Improved Engagement: Enhances user experience with personalized content, driving higher engagement rates.
Cost-Effectiveness: Offers a scalable and integrated platform resulting in cost savings through reduced operational costs and higher returns.
Enhanced Security: Provides robust protection, ensuring data integrity and building customer trust.

Industries such as healthcare, finance, and retail find Kentico advantageous due to its adaptability in managing sector-specific requirements. It seamlessly integrates with industry-specific applications, optimizing digital strategies to improve customer interactions and operational efficiency.

Kentico

SharePoint offers document management, collaboration, and Microsoft Office integration, with a user-friendly interface supporting workflows and customization. Organizations benefit from centralized content storage, improving team coordination and efficiency.

SharePoint is tailored for document and content management, offering collaboration tools, workflow automation, and integration with Microsoft products. It supports robust search, metadata tagging, and access control. While performance and the interface require enhancements, it remains a valuable tool for organizations managing internal and external communications. Integration with Microsoft Teams and OneDrive facilitates collaboration, and SharePoint's centralized repositories and document storage enhance team efficiency. Power Platform integration allows for quick data handling and automation, boosting productivity.

What Are the Most Notable Features of SharePoint?

Document Management: Organize and manage documents efficiently.
Collaboration Tools: Enhance team collaboration and communication.
Microsoft Office Integration: Seamlessly work with Office applications.
Search Capabilities: Robust search and metadata tagging for easy retrieval.
Access Control: Protect and manage sensitive information access.
Power Platform Integration: Quick data handling and automation for improved productivity.

What Benefits Should Users Look for When Evaluating SharePoint?

Improved Team Efficiency: Enhance coordination and document sharing.
Centralized Storage: Efficient content management in a centralized repository.
Seamless Workflow Automation: Automate processes to boost productivity.
Integration Capability: Enhance functionality with external services and applications.
Customization Options: Tailor workflows and user experience to business needs.

In various industries, SharePoint is used for document and content management, supporting specific department sites and internal communications. It facilitates automation and policy management while offering integration with Microsoft Teams and OneDrive for improved collaboration and geographical team coordination.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Gibson Musical Instruments, Mazda, Segway, Twinings, Ingram Micro, Allergan, Kingspan

Toyota, Aeroports de Paris, ASBBank Ltd., Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals, CambridgeshireConstabulary, D&M Group, NPL Construction Company, and The Regional Municipality of Niagara.

Buyer's Guide

Kentico vs. SharePoint

June 2026

Free Report: Kentico vs. SharePoint

Find out what your peers are saying about Kentico vs. SharePoint and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

899,204 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kentico vs. SharePoint report.

See our list of best Web Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.