Kentico vs SharePoint comparison

Kentico and Microsoft are both solutions in the Web Content Management category. Kentico is ranked #16, while Microsoft is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.2. Kentico holds a 2.4% mindshare in WCM, compared to Microsoft’s 7.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Kentico users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 79% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Kentico

Read 2 Kentico reviews

1,227 Views
945 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SharePoint

Read 167 SharePoint reviews

17,781 Views
3,378 Comparison Views

79% willing to recommend

Kentico

SharePoint

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Kentico and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Web Content Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Kentico vs. SharePoint Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Kentico vs. SharePoint

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 906,852 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kentico

Ranking in Web Content Management

16th

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Digital Experience Platforms (DXP) (19th)

SharePoint

Ranking in Web Content Management

2nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

167

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Content Management (1st), Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) (1st), Enterprise Intranet (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Web Content Management category, the mindshare of Kentico is 2.4%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SharePoint is 7.0%, down from 11.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Content Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SharePoint	7.0%
Kentico	2.4%
Other	90.6%

Web Content Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer1384113

President at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

Flexible, offers helpful web templates, and has good connectivity with third-party applications

Kentico is one of the top solutions on the magic quadrant. Currently, all of the development that we do, we hard-code ourselves. We don't use local development frameworks for other systems. We are looking to expand our use of Kentico by adding no-code or low-code products for rapid development. My advice for anybody who is implementing Kentico is that if they are transitioning into it then be sure to use a phased approach. Don't try to migrate everything right away. I suggest doing it over time and become familiar with the system. If it is only one site then it will not be too difficult, but normally, there are multiple sites. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Ravi Raushan Kumar

Software Engineer at ValueMomentum

Centralized document governance has boosted collaboration and made knowledge sharing structured

SharePoint is a powerful platform, but there are a few areas where I think it could be improved, such as user experience. For new users, the interface and navigation can feel quite complex, specifically when working with multiple sites and document libraries. Another improvement would be search functionalities. While it is good sometimes, it does not always return the most relevant result unless a document is very well-structured and tagged. Also, initial setup and customizations can be time-consuming and may require technical expertise, specifically when configuring workflows or permissions. From a modern development perspective, tighter and more seamless integrations with tools including Power Automate and better support for custom backend integrations through APIs could make it more efficient. Overall, simplifying usability and enhancing search and integration capability would make SharePoint even stronger. One additional area I would appreciate improvement would be performance and responsiveness, especially when dealing with a large document library. Sometimes loading or navigating through large datasets can feel quite slow. Another aspect is permissions management. While it is very powerful, it can become complex to manage at scale, specifically when there are multiple levels of access across teams and projects. Improving developer experience would also be beneficial. Making customization, API integrations, and extensions more straightforward would help teams, especially backend developers, leverage SharePoint more efficiently.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Kentico is a very stable and mature system; it's one of the best on the market."

"The most valuable features are its integration capabilities and advanced marketing suite."

"I would say they have a modern, flexible, agile content management system."

"It has helped us establish our business in the USA and allows us to work with a range of corporate clients."

"There are a lot of valuable features (e.g., ease of use, collaboration, integration with LDAP, security, accessibility, stability, etc.)."

"I would recommend it."

"Our staff found it simpler, as they did not have to work within a classification system."

"SharePoint Search improved document searchability from different sources like file systems and Office 365."

"The document library feature in this product is most valuable."

"The ability to quickly and easily create team sites has been great."

"The most valuable feature of SharePoint is its ease of use."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to easily build intranet sites for communicating within teams, storing documentation, product information, pricing policies, updates on product infrastructure, and other related news."

More SharePoint pros

Cons

"They don't have a lot of libraries, which is something that they can improve on."

"This product needs an out of the box Intranet/Extranet Solution."

"When used with large data, SharePoint may produce performance degradation; that requires some optimization and tweaks."

"The navigation is confusing."

"Microsoft seems to always be making changes."

"The documentation can be improved, so it is easier to use for non-technical people."

"Technical support was not as good as expected. Sometimes request took upwards of three business days."

"I understand that some functions are lost when you store the information in a file system, so maybe that's a way SharePoint can improve."

"Needs improvement on the user interface."

"It does too many things and some of them seem impossible to set up."

More SharePoint cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing fees are probably about $100,000 USD per year."

"The cost is expensive, but worthwhile."

"The pricing is competitive."

"It comes bundled with the Microsoft 365 pricing plans."

"The replacement costs for it are cheaper if you use only SharePoint."

"SharePoint is included with our Microsoft license."

"The licensing model for SharePoint Online is based on per user, and it is monthly. The price of the solution overall is good."

"As usual, Microsoft’s licensing structures don’t really seem to fit the needs of their products. This leads to always paying for a project you will never use fully or always be adding to."

"The product is reasonably priced."

More SharePoint pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Content Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

906,852 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user8925

Developer with 51-200 employees

Aug 23, 2013

Jive vs Sharepoint vs Drupal Commons

At Mediacurrent we often get requests to compare Drupal to other platforms used for intranet sites and social business platforms (like https://dev.twitter.com/ for example). This is often referred to as “Social Business Software”, which has grown in popularity in recent years. I decided to do a…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

10%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	81
Midsize Enterprise	40
Large Enterprise	83

Questions from the Community

Does Kentico provide good options for marketing?

Absolutely! I can't stress enough how important marketing is for the digital experience you're giving to customers. If you want to reach your clients through multiple channels, each type of content...

See all answers

What is the content management system of Kentico like?

In my experience, Kentico has been a very flexible and easy-to-use content management system. Keep in mind that we haven't been using it for a while because our management decided to change DXPs fo...

See all answers

What do you use Kentico for?

Hello, I think Kentico will serve you well as a digital experience platform and especially for commerce purposes. We at my company have been using this feature of the DXP as well because we recentl...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SharePoint?

I do not know the difference between the prices of the two solutions; I did not work on this project.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SharePoint?

For me SharePoint is amazing. I have not thought about any feature that could be better because downloads and renaming are all easy. However, there is a feature that could be better. When you are u...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SharePoint?

We use SharePoint as our cloud storage for files, folders, and everything else. We have different teams, including the evidence and impact team which I work with, the alumni team, and other teams t...

See all answers

Comparisons

Drupal vs Kentico

Compared 25% of the time

Adobe Experience Manager vs Kentico

Compared 14% of the time

Crownpeak Digital Experience Management vs Kentico

Compared 11% of the time

Liferay Digital Experience Platform vs Kentico

Compared 10% of the time

More Kentico Competitors

OpenText Documentum Content Management vs SharePoint

Compared 14% of the time

OpenText Content Management vs SharePoint

Compared 4% of the time

Box vs SharePoint

Compared 3% of the time

IBM FileNet vs SharePoint

Compared 3% of the time

Drupal vs SharePoint

Compared 3% of the time

More SharePoint Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Web Content Management

July 2026

Download Kentico product report

Buyer's Guide

SharePoint

July 2026

Download SharePoint product report

Also Known As

No data available

SharePoint 2007, SharePoint 2010

Overview

Kentico is a comprehensive digital experience platform designed for enterprises seeking scalable web solutions. It offers rich capabilities enabling users to build and manage engaging websites and digital experiences.

Kentico empowers users with flexible and integrated capabilities ideal for content management, digital marketing, and e-commerce. Its customizable architecture helps businesses streamline processes and deliver tailored experiences. With robust security and performance features, it supports enterprises in driving successful digital strategies. Notable for its ease of integration with existing systems, Kentico is adaptable for businesses aiming to optimize their outreach and engagement.

What are Kentico's most valuable features?

Content Management: Streamlined workflows and user-friendly tools for optimal content creation and management.
Digital Marketing: Comprehensive tools for running personalized campaigns and tracking customer journeys.
E-commerce: Integration capabilities to enhance online retail operations with a flexible commerce engine.
Security: Advanced security features to guard against threats and ensure data protection.
Scalability: Designed to grow with businesses, accommodating increased traffic and expanding needs.

What benefits and ROI aspects should reviews emphasize?

Increased Efficiency: Streamlines processes, reducing time and resources spent on managing digital experiences.
Improved Engagement: Enhances user experience with personalized content, driving higher engagement rates.
Cost-Effectiveness: Offers a scalable and integrated platform resulting in cost savings through reduced operational costs and higher returns.
Enhanced Security: Provides robust protection, ensuring data integrity and building customer trust.

Industries such as healthcare, finance, and retail find Kentico advantageous due to its adaptability in managing sector-specific requirements. It seamlessly integrates with industry-specific applications, optimizing digital strategies to improve customer interactions and operational efficiency.

Kentico

SharePoint offers document management, collaboration, and Microsoft Office integration, with a user-friendly interface supporting workflows and customization. Organizations benefit from centralized content storage, improving team coordination and efficiency.

SharePoint is tailored for document and content management, offering collaboration tools, workflow automation, and integration with Microsoft products. It supports robust search, metadata tagging, and access control. While performance and the interface require enhancements, it remains a valuable tool for organizations managing internal and external communications. Integration with Microsoft Teams and OneDrive facilitates collaboration, and SharePoint's centralized repositories and document storage enhance team efficiency. Power Platform integration allows for quick data handling and automation, boosting productivity.

What Are the Most Notable Features of SharePoint?

Document Management: Organize and manage documents efficiently.
Collaboration Tools: Enhance team collaboration and communication.
Microsoft Office Integration: Seamlessly work with Office applications.
Search Capabilities: Robust search and metadata tagging for easy retrieval.
Access Control: Protect and manage sensitive information access.
Power Platform Integration: Quick data handling and automation for improved productivity.

What Benefits Should Users Look for When Evaluating SharePoint?

Improved Team Efficiency: Enhance coordination and document sharing.
Centralized Storage: Efficient content management in a centralized repository.
Seamless Workflow Automation: Automate processes to boost productivity.
Integration Capability: Enhance functionality with external services and applications.
Customization Options: Tailor workflows and user experience to business needs.

In various industries, SharePoint is used for document and content management, supporting specific department sites and internal communications. It facilitates automation and policy management while offering integration with Microsoft Teams and OneDrive for improved collaboration and geographical team coordination.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Gibson Musical Instruments, Mazda, Segway, Twinings, Ingram Micro, Allergan, Kingspan

Toyota, Aeroports de Paris, ASBBank Ltd., Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals, CambridgeshireConstabulary, D&M Group, NPL Construction Company, and The Regional Municipality of Niagara.

Buyer's Guide

Kentico vs. SharePoint

June 2026

Free Report: Kentico vs. SharePoint

Find out what your peers are saying about Kentico vs. SharePoint and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

906,852 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kentico vs. SharePoint report.

See our list of best Web Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.