Kentico vs SharePoint comparison

Kentico and Microsoft are both solutions in the Web Content Management category. Kentico is ranked #20, while Microsoft is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1. Kentico holds a 1.8% mindshare in WCM, compared to Microsoft’s 7.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Kentico users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 79% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Kentico

Read 2 Kentico reviews

560 Views
431 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SharePoint

Read 165 SharePoint reviews

10,950 Views
1,862 Comparison Views

79% willing to recommend

Kentico

SharePoint

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Kentico and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Web Content Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Kentico vs. SharePoint Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Kentico vs. SharePoint

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,376 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kentico

Ranking in Web Content Management

20th

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Digital Experience Platforms (DXP) (18th)

SharePoint

Ranking in Web Content Management

2nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

165

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Content Management (1st), Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) (1st), Enterprise Intranet (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Web Content Management category, the mindshare of Kentico is 1.8%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SharePoint is 7.3%, down from 12.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Content Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SharePoint	7.3%
Kentico	1.8%
Other	90.9%

Web Content Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer1384113

President at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

Flexible, offers helpful web templates, and has good connectivity with third-party applications

Kentico is one of the top solutions on the magic quadrant. Currently, all of the development that we do, we hard-code ourselves. We don't use local development frameworks for other systems. We are looking to expand our use of Kentico by adding no-code or low-code products for rapid development. My advice for anybody who is implementing Kentico is that if they are transitioning into it then be sure to use a phased approach. Don't try to migrate everything right away. I suggest doing it over time and become familiar with the system. If it is only one site then it will not be too difficult, but normally, there are multiple sites. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

Read full review

reviewer2811600

SDE 1 at a educational organization with 501-1,000 employees

Centralized document governance has boosted collaboration and made knowledge sharing structured

SharePoint is a powerful platform, but there are a few areas where I think it could be improved, such as user experience. For new users, the interface and navigation can feel quite complex, specifically when working with multiple sites and document libraries. Another improvement would be search functionalities. While it is good sometimes, it does not always return the most relevant result unless a document is very well-structured and tagged. Also, initial setup and customizations can be time-consuming and may require technical expertise, specifically when configuring workflows or permissions. From a modern development perspective, tighter and more seamless integrations with tools including Power Automate and better support for custom backend integrations through APIs could make it more efficient. Overall, simplifying usability and enhancing search and integration capability would make SharePoint even stronger. One additional area I would appreciate improvement would be performance and responsiveness, especially when dealing with a large document library. Sometimes loading or navigating through large datasets can feel quite slow. Another aspect is permissions management. While it is very powerful, it can become complex to manage at scale, specifically when there are multiple levels of access across teams and projects. Improving developer experience would also be beneficial. Making customization, API integrations, and extensions more straightforward would help teams, especially backend developers, leverage SharePoint more efficiently.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are its integration capabilities and advanced marketing suite."

"I would say they have a modern, flexible, agile content management system."

"It has helped us establish our business in the USA and allows us to work with a range of corporate clients."

"Kentico is a very stable and mature system; it's one of the best on the market."

"SharePoint is a great document management tool."

"What I like about SharePoint is that they keep up with a lot of updates, and they bring out new features. I also like that the system is integrated with the Microsoft 365 suite of apps."

"SharePoint provides out-of-the-box data indexing and caching."

"We are mainly using the document sharing feature to share documents with customers in a secure way."

"When properly implemented and users are adequately trained, SharePoint can take the place of network file shares for most types of use cases."

"SharePoint's collaborative features are valuable as they enable productivity by allowing multiple users to edit documents simultaneously."

"It has an easy to distribute administration capability, and can also scale to meet a large number of future needs."

"The online editing capabilities, file sharing, auditing, information security, ease of solution management, and the easy user adaptation to the platform are the most valuable features."

More SharePoint pros

Cons

"They don't have a lot of libraries, which is something that they can improve on."

"This product needs an out of the box Intranet/Extranet Solution."

"They don't have a lot of libraries, which is something that they can improve on."

"The solution should be made more user-friendly for technical and business people."

"I would like to see the following: More freedom given to a power user Feature development on a site collection level without the need for farm-level rights"

"Technical support rates a 3.5/5."

"One issue is that when users mistakenly hide files or set permissions incorrectly, it can lead to files becoming inaccessible, requiring intervention from Microsoft support to resolve."

"Workflow is something that can become more intelligent."

"We did have issues with scalability. Performance isn’t so good if too many people use it."

"We would like more security features, like automating."

"The workflow engine cannot support the business needs."

More SharePoint cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing fees are probably about $100,000 USD per year."

"The pricing works for us."

"The solution's pricing is relatively expensive because it's bundled with other products."

"The replacement costs for it are cheaper if you use only SharePoint."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"The data classification and search elements are cheap."

"The pricing is competitive."

"As usual, Microsoft’s licensing structures don’t really seem to fit the needs of their products. This leads to always paying for a project you will never use fully or always be adding to."

"The cost is expensive, but worthwhile."

More SharePoint pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Content Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user8925

Developer with 51-200 employees

Aug 23, 2013

Jive vs Sharepoint vs Drupal Commons

At Mediacurrent we often get requests to compare Drupal to other platforms used for intranet sites and social business platforms (like https://dev.twitter.com/ for example). This is often referred to as “Social Business Software”, which has grown in popularity in recent years. I decided to do a…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

University

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	80
Midsize Enterprise	39
Large Enterprise	81

Questions from the Community

Does Kentico provide good options for marketing?

Absolutely! I can't stress enough how important marketing is for the digital experience you're giving to customers. If you want to reach your clients through multiple channels, each type of content...

See all answers

What is the content management system of Kentico like?

In my experience, Kentico has been a very flexible and easy-to-use content management system. Keep in mind that we haven't been using it for a while because our management decided to change DXPs fo...

See all answers

What do you use Kentico for?

Hello, I think Kentico will serve you well as a digital experience platform and especially for commerce purposes. We at my company have been using this feature of the DXP as well because we recentl...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SharePoint?

I do not know the difference between the prices of the two solutions; I did not work on this project.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SharePoint?

It is not really better; we use the same solution as before with Google Drive and the Google App solution. Sometimes I have to refresh pages more than with Google, but it does not charge; the page ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SharePoint?

I create a data warehouse and establish a link between different applications. For data exchange, the vendor is Oracle.

See all answers

Comparisons

Drupal vs Kentico

Compared 23% of the time

Adobe Experience Manager vs Kentico

Compared 15% of the time

Crownpeak Digital Experience Management vs Kentico

Compared 12% of the time

Sitecore Experience Manager vs Kentico

Compared 10% of the time

WordPress Business-Enterprise vs Kentico

Compared 10% of the time

More Kentico Competitors

OpenText Documentum Content Management vs SharePoint

Compared 9% of the time

Box vs SharePoint

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Content Management vs SharePoint

Compared 5% of the time

IBM FileNet vs SharePoint

Compared 4% of the time

DocuSign vs SharePoint

Compared 4% of the time

More SharePoint Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Web Content Management

March 2026

Download Kentico product report

Buyer's Guide

SharePoint

March 2026

Download SharePoint product report

Also Known As

No data available

SharePoint 2007, SharePoint 2010

Overview

Kentico is a high-quality digital experience platform that allows companies and organizations to reach customers across different channels through its content management, digital marketing, and e-commerce features. Kentico offers easy-to-use applications that allow even beginners to create a working DXP that will benefit their organization as well as the users on their platform. Kentico also provides a way for companies to track the satisfaction of their customers through a detailed customer data platform that is fully compliant with GDPR, CCPA, and other data regulations. Companies can receive insight into different target groups within their customer base. This top-quality feature of Kentico helps businesses to adapt to the needs of their customers and make their DX more successful.

Kentico Features

Kentico’s value-added features include:

Content management: Page builder, option for structured content, digital asset management, multilingual content, workflows and versioning, multi-site management.
Digital marketing: Kentico offers companies a variety of features regarding the creation of successful digital marketing for their brands, ensuring the vast reach of their content. Features in this category include market automation and personalization, content management, email marketing, social marketing, recommendations, search, form builder, and SEO optimization.
Digital commerce: Shopping cart and checkout process, payment and shipping options, promotion and discounts, product information management and multi-store management, and commerce integration. To provide you with the ability to reach an international client base, Kentico also offers multilingual shopping.
Customer data: An efficient digital experience platform should be able to provide companies with the ability to track and analyze customer data to be able to act accordingly and improve its services to benefit clients. Kentico offers features that include contact management, segmentation, activity tracking, lead scoring, personas, and data protection, to ensure that the DXP complies with all data protection regulations.
Analytics: Kentico also offers features like A/B testing, web analytics, and reporting, to provide companies with data about performance of the DXP.
Platform: Headless API, deployment tools, MVC development, and cloud deployment help businesses build and maintain their digital experience platforms.
Integrations: There are various integration features that this DXP provides for its clients, including out-of-the-box integrations, translation management, and integration bus.

Kentico Benefits

The Kentico digital experience platform offers its users the following benefits:

Easy content management
Ability to maximize ROI
Option to launch a DXP with low to no code
Digital experience maturity
Solutions for multichannel marketing

Reviews from Real Users

Kentico is a modern, flexible and agile content management system, according to the President at a tech services company that uses the DXP for UI and website development.

Kentico

SharePoint is a Microsoft-based platform for building web applications. It covers a widerange of capabilities and while it is appropriate for experienced webdevelopers, even non-technical minded users can easily navigate through thesystem and execute functions such as collaborating data, managing documents andfiles, creating websites, managing social networking solutions, and automatingworkflow.

Major areas that SharePoint deals with are websites,communities, content, search, insights, and composites. The purpose is to give usersthe ability to create or develop these key business components on their owneven without technical knowledge of, for example, how to build a website or howto integrate coding. Configuring SharePoint into a business's system is meantto cut out all of the complicated steps, and pave the way for easierimplementation all around.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Gibson Musical Instruments, Mazda, Segway, Twinings, Ingram Micro, Allergan, Kingspan

Toyota, Aeroports de Paris, ASBBank Ltd., Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals, CambridgeshireConstabulary, D&M Group, NPL Construction Company, and The Regional Municipality of Niagara.

Buyer's Guide

Kentico vs. SharePoint

March 2026

Free Report: Kentico vs. SharePoint

Find out what your peers are saying about Kentico vs. SharePoint and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kentico vs. SharePoint report.

See our list of best Web Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.