


Sophos Endpoint and Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum both compete in the advanced endpoint protection category. Sophos seems to have the upper hand due to its AI-driven threat detection and cloud-focused capabilities, according to the data comparisons.
Features: Sophos Endpoint offers advanced ransomware rollback, AI-driven threat detection, and synchronized security through Sophos Central. Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum provides central management, modular capabilities, and compatibility with various operating systems for enhanced threat detection and endpoint protection.
Room for Improvement: Sophos Endpoint needs to enhance its on-premises solutions, Linux endpoint support, and reduce resource usage. Users reported setup complexities and slower support response times. Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum should improve malware detection, AI integration, and lessen resource demands on older hardware. Its interface and update process also require enhancements.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Sophos Endpoint supports both public and on-premises deployments, though it favors cloud-based solutions, which some users find restrictive. Customer support experiences are mixed, with some reporting delays. Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum predominantly offers on-premises deployment, which suits user preferences for control. Its customer service gets varied feedback, focusing on timely responses and communication improvements.
Pricing and ROI: Sophos Endpoint is perceived as slightly expensive but offers competitive pricing with benefits like long-term license discounts, justified by its extensive features. Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum is generally cheaper and considered cost-effective, though its complex licensing for advanced features can pose challenges. Both deliver a solid return on investment with improved security and productivity.
They appreciate the rich telemetry data from the solution, as it provides in-depth threat identification.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks helps to reduce my total cost of ownership significantly.
In Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, most of the remediation is automated and the accuracy is quite good.
The technical support from Palo Alto deserves a mark of ten because they reach out within an hour whenever assistance is needed.
There is no back and forth, and they know what we are asking for and come up with the best resolution for a solution.
If any of these services are missed, it becomes a problem in terms of support tickets, follow-up, or special configuration that needs to be done in the system.
The technical support from Kaspersky was very responsive.
I would rate technical support from Kaspersky a nine out of ten.
I rate Sophos support as excellent, giving it a ten out of ten.
I would give customer support a rating of 10 out of 10 because they resolve my problems as soon as possible, and I receive very good, quick support from Sophos.
They have introduced a dedicated role called Technical Account Manager (TAM) for every partner.
You can onboard 10,000 endpoints in just hours, which demonstrates the excellent scalability of this product.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can be expanded anytime by purchasing another license without any issues related to scalability.
I think scalability for Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is good.
Any endpoint added to Active Directory can be detected by Kaspersky Security Center, which can then push the agent onto it.
Both scalability and stability of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business are solid.
If we are using 300 machines and suddenly 10 more people are joining our organization, I will just raise a ticket on Sophos Endpoint and they will increase my 10 endpoint licenses.
Cortex remains fast and responsive, even with increasing data and alerts.
The thresholds we've seen on our firewall boxes at some instances reached 80% to 85%, but even at that level of utilization, we don't observe any latency or any issues reported with respect to accessing the application.
Cortex XDR is stable, offering high quality and reliable performance.
There have been performance issues during scanning, causing the PC to respond slowly.
Sophos Endpoint is stable in my experience for the past two years.
Improving reporting and dashboard customization, along with the addition of real-time and exportable reports, would help SOC teams greatly.
The inclusion of this feature would allow the application of DLP policies alongside antivirus policies via a single agent and console, making it more competitive as other OEMs often offer DLP solutions as part of their antivirus products.
If the per GB data could be provided at a certain level free of cost or at the same cost which the customer is taking for the entire bundle, that would be better.
Kaspersky needs to improve its security techniques as it has not been in Gartner records for the last two years.
I previously mentioned that Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business doesn't have built-in DLP, which was a concern.
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business does not have encryption tools.
Sophos Endpoint should include the Linux endpoint agent and should provide a solution for Linux endpoints as well, because the server license is costly and nobody wants to use the server license on an endpoint machine.
The enterprise integration is very poor, requiring a lot of manual work.
Users have noted that daily upload limits per device, overall data lake storage capacity tied to licenses, and daily API query limits can be restrictive.
The pricing on SentinelOne is far more reasonable and cheaper than Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks.
I would say it is definitely not a cheap product, considering how mature it is and how scalable all Palo Alto products are together.
Cortex XDR is perceived as expensive by some customers, yet offers dynamic pricing.
The pricing and licensing cost of Kaspersky Endpoint Security is cheaper compared to Trend Micro.
The cost is reasonable and cheaper than other alternatives.
It is quite affordable; I think the pricing and licensing are reasonable.
The pricing is slightly increased, but it is good because Sophos Endpoint has a lot of features.
It incorporates AI for normal behavior detection, distinguishing unusual operations.
The product provides automation responses in case of a threat attack, severity assessments, centralized manageability, and comprehensive compliance features, resulting in reduced costs.
It includes machine learning to easily analyze data and detect complex threats across endpoints, networks, or clouds.
It stands out as an antivirus and malware protection solution due to its extensive feeds and resources for antivirus signatures.
The best features in Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business are the file threat protection, web threat protection, mail threat protection, network threat protection, firewall, behavior detection, and exploit prevention.
The unified endpoint management and the capabilities that are added to the antivirus and anti-malware are what differentiate this solution from others.
Key features for comprehensive detection and prevention include advanced threat prevention, ransomware protections, exploit prevention, and AI-powered detections.
Web filtering helps provide protection by allowing me to block unwanted and unauthorized websites from Sophos EPP Suite, which helps prevent unauthorized intrusion, thus keeping our organization servers secure.
With the reseller management, I can manage multiple clients without having to log in to each client.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks | 3.6% |
| Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business | 2.3% |
| Sophos Endpoint | 1.4% |
| Other | 92.7% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 44 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 20 |
| Large Enterprise | 48 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 63 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 27 |
| Large Enterprise | 33 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 45 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.
Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.
What are the key features of Cortex XDR?Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.
Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum offers robust protection and user-friendly detection tools beyond endpoints for small to mid-sized businesses, enhancing cybersecurity strategies with essential EDR and seamless XDR integration.
Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum unites endpoint protection with automatic response capabilities, allowing businesses to identify, analyze, and neutralize threats efficiently. With features like antivirus, firewall, encryption, centralized management, and robust reporting, it supports multiple platforms and enhances secure environments for computers, servers, and networks. While user satisfaction is high due to its straightforward management and modular capabilities, some desire improvements in performance, AI integration, and cloud compatibility. Enhanced support, training, and simpler updates are also sought, though organizations value its effectiveness against malware and spyware. Despite high pricing and resource demands, Kaspersky's user-friendly approach and integration capabilities remain appreciated.
What are the features of Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum?
What benefits or ROI can users expect?
Organizations rely on Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum for endpoint protection against cyber threats, including malware and ransomware. Deployed across computers, servers, and mobile environments, it allows for centralized manageability, device control, and web access control. This approach ensures comprehensive security updates, file encryption, and efficient network activity monitoring, making it suitable for diverse business implementations.
Sophos Endpoint offers centralized management, AI-powered detection, and comprehensive threat prevention. It is designed for antivirus, ransomware defense, and threat management across sectors like education, healthcare, and finance. Its benefits include synchronized security, simple deployment, and a user-friendly interface.
Sophos Endpoint provides multiple functionalities to protect networks, devices, and applications. It emphasizes advanced threat prevention and AI-powered detections, enhancing protection against malware and ransomware. Combining web filtering, machine learning, and data loss prevention ensures a secure environment, while integration with other Sophos tools allows for streamlined security management. Sophos Endpoint addresses the need for efficient protection with lightweight operations, synchronized security between endpoints and firewalls, and notable ease of deployment. Resource management is a key focus, alongside improving antivirus detection and systems integration. Price competitiveness and expanded support for macOS are also priorities.
What are some key features of Sophos Endpoint?In the education, healthcare, and finance sectors, Sophos Endpoint is utilized to ensure secure IT infrastructure. It supports initiatives in digital safety and compliance with integration capabilities for web filtering, firewall, and VPN security. Organizations benefit from mobile device management and disk encryption to safeguard sensitive information effectively.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.