


Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response and Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud are solutions in the endpoint protection market. Kaspersky appears to lead in pricing and ROI, while Trellix may outshine in support and deployment.
Features: Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response thrives in real-time threat detection and automated response capabilities. It boasts sophisticated analytics for threat identification and supports proactive protection with comprehensive data integration. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud offers robust cloud-based management, a comprehensive security dashboard, and strong malware protection. It features layered security options for various environments and integrates seamlessly with cloud services like Microsoft Office 365.
Room for Improvement: Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response could benefit from better management of large information flows and requires skilled personnel for effective monitoring. Simplified contract management can also enhance its usability. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud faces challenges with its update process, occasionally affecting data export and central management tasks. Improving its false positives handling and further easing endpoint device updates could enhance user experience. The necessity to upgrade to comprehensive solutions like XDR suggests additional room for improvement.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response offers a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer support, ensuring quick issue resolution. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud benefits from its cloud-based deployment allowing flexible access. Despite efficient support, its customer service might not be as immediate as Trellix, leaving room for some customer dissatisfaction.
Pricing and ROI: Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud is known for competitive pricing and significant value, particularly appealing to small to medium-sized businesses. Its cost-effective licensing options contribute to a well-regarded ROI. Contrastingly, Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response involves a higher initial investment but is justified through advanced threat detection features, suitable for organizations focusing on superior security outcomes over entry cost.
They appreciate the rich telemetry data from the solution, as it provides in-depth threat identification.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks helps to reduce my total cost of ownership significantly.
In Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, most of the remediation is automated and the accuracy is quite good.
The technical support from Palo Alto deserves a mark of ten because they reach out within an hour whenever assistance is needed.
There is no back and forth, and they know what we are asking for and come up with the best resolution for a solution.
If any of these services are missed, it becomes a problem in terms of support tickets, follow-up, or special configuration that needs to be done in the system.
They should start offering sessions if there's some critical error occurring, even if someone has to pay for the support.
We contacted support, and they answered all questions.
I have contracted support and also have an operating control so I can get various types of support.
On our servers, we do not want it to touch our resources, so we deployed Sophos XDR on the server.
You can onboard 10,000 endpoints in just hours, which demonstrates the excellent scalability of this product.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can be expanded anytime by purchasing another license without any issues related to scalability.
I think scalability for Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is good.
If you assign a device to a user in Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud, you cannot reassign it to another user.
Cortex remains fast and responsive, even with increasing data and alerts.
The thresholds we've seen on our firewall boxes at some instances reached 80% to 85%, but even at that level of utilization, we don't observe any latency or any issues reported with respect to accessing the application.
Cortex XDR is stable, offering high quality and reliable performance.
So I have to use Sophos XDR on servers because Sophos XDR does not consume resources.
Improving reporting and dashboard customization, along with the addition of real-time and exportable reports, would help SOC teams greatly.
The inclusion of this feature would allow the application of DLP policies alongside antivirus policies via a single agent and console, making it more competitive as other OEMs often offer DLP solutions as part of their antivirus products.
If the per GB data could be provided at a certain level free of cost or at the same cost which the customer is taking for the entire bundle, that would be better.
Recently, there was a company which was attacked by phishing emails, and out of 10, it was only blocking three emails.
Changes occur without notification or updates from the Kaspersky team, making it difficult to prepare for modifications.
I am seeing, for workflows, some sort of ethical hacking to test our environment.
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) is interesting and is a very good entry point that has been evolving through the last years.
They can enhance Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) using AI now to do more enhanced reporting and more enhanced threat analysis.
The pricing on SentinelOne is far more reasonable and cheaper than Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks.
I would say it is definitely not a cheap product, considering how mature it is and how scalable all Palo Alto products are together.
Cortex XDR is perceived as expensive by some customers, yet offers dynamic pricing.
It incorporates AI for normal behavior detection, distinguishing unusual operations.
The product provides automation responses in case of a threat attack, severity assessments, centralized manageability, and comprehensive compliance features, resulting in reduced costs.
It includes machine learning to easily analyze data and detect complex threats across endpoints, networks, or clouds.
Endpoint Detection and Response functionality includes root cause analysis and device isolation.
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud is one of the best, very effective software because of its vulnerability assessment and threat assessments.
We contacted support, and they answered all questions.
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) has very good threat hunting capability.
I have spent efforts on training our managers and others - what can software do if the knowledge base is low?
All the tree of data that we have, which may be a lot of information to argue whether it is going to be a threat or not, can be analyzed.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks | 3.4% |
| Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) | 1.0% |
| Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud | 0.7% |
| Other | 94.9% |



| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 44 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 20 |
| Large Enterprise | 48 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 14 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.
Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.
What are the key features of Cortex XDR?Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud offers robust cybersecurity with features like malware detection and cloud-based endpoint management, suitable for businesses requiring advanced protection.
This solution provides comprehensive endpoint security, including a self-protection mechanism, EDR service, and integration with Microsoft Office 365. It supports multiple operating systems with components like Web Control, Device Control, and BitLocker encryption. Anti-phishing and anti-malware features, alongside detailed vulnerability assessments, enhance its security capabilities. Despite its strengths, users note areas for improvement in deployment, update management, and resource usage. Challenges include high CPU usage, installation delays, and stability issues. Companies benefit from features like ransomware protection and cloud platform integration, ensuring protection against threats.
What are the most important features of Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud?Companies in sectors such as automation and insurance implement Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud for its advanced cybersecurity features. They rely on its capabilities for application blocking, web and email threat defense, and compliance with data protection standards. By leveraging endpoint management and behavior analysis, organizations integrate this tool with cloud platforms to secure servers, workstations, and mobile devices.
Reduce the time to detect and respond to threats. Trellix EDR helps security analysts quickly prioritize threats and minimize potential disruption.
Guided investigation automatically asks and answers questions while gathering, summarizing, and visualizing evidence from multiple sources—reducing the need for more SOC resources.
Cloud-based deployment and analytics enables your skilled security analysts to focus on strategic defense, instead of tool maintenance. Benefit from implementing the right solution for you.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.