SonicWall Capture Client and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum compete in endpoint security solutions. User reviews suggest SonicWall Capture Client has an edge in pricing and customer support, while Kaspersky offers more comprehensive features justifying its higher cost.
Features: SonicWall Capture Client is praised for its seamless integration with SonicWall firewalls, real-time threat detection, and competitive pricing. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is known for advanced threat hunting, automated response capabilities, and a robust feature set suitable for sophisticated threats.
Room for Improvement: SonicWall Capture Client needs to enhance reporting capabilities, improve malware detection accuracy, and add more advanced features. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum could benefit from more intuitive management, faster support response times, and improved user management.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SonicWall Capture Client offers a straightforward deployment process and strong customer service. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is more complex to deploy but is supported by extensive documentation and efficient customer service, helping to mitigate initial deployment challenges.
Pricing and ROI: SonicWall Capture Client is highlighted for its competitive pricing, providing good ROI, especially suited for smaller organizations. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum, although more expensive, delivers substantial value through advanced features, justifying the investment for larger enterprises seeking enhanced security measures.
I have observed value for money from Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum.
Compared to other solution providers, the responses are not very clear when we need support.
We usually solve issues ourselves due to our experience, as paid support is not used.
I rate the technical support between seven and eight out of ten for Kaspersky.
Partners can purchase single endpoints at prices equivalent to 1,000-endpoint deals, providing an advantage for managed security service provider partners.
While their escalation process is understandable, it can be time-consuming as all logs need to be provided multiple times across different service levels.
It is very easy for me to scale.
Currently, I find it good and easily scalable.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is scalable for my environment.
There are no restrictions on the scalability of SonicWall Capture Client.
SonicWall Capture Client is accessed via cloud-based management console.
The installation process is straightforward, requiring only five pilot installations to enable customers to complete the remaining installations independently.
The solution is highly stable, scoring more than nine in terms of protection.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is stable.
To increase the benefits of the product, Managed Detection and Response (MDR) service from Kaspersky should be included.
The uninstallation needs better handling, specifically with automatic license deletions.
SonicWall can integrate with other products such as Sophos, SentinelOne, and several others, but not with Kaspersky.
One of the drawbacks is that I cannot use Advanced and Premier licenses within a single tenant, which can be problematic when users need to deploy different licenses.
XDR cannot be used unless MDR services are purchased with SonicWall.
A significant limitation is that SonicWall Capture Client cannot be installed on smartphones, as there is no mobile version available.
Kaspersky is very cheap compared to solutions like CrowdStrike or other vendors.
The value from Kaspersky is very good, especially since we recently got a special deal.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is reasonably priced for the market.
SonicWall Capture Client offers a cost-effective solution that's cheaper compared to other vendors like CrowdStrike.
It fulfills security and protection requirements against newly discovered malware, especially ransomware attacks.
Threat Response Automation in Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is quite effective for enhancing security.
In the past month, we encountered an unknown type of malware, but the behavior was sufficient for Kaspersky to isolate the network based on this behavior, which proved very efficient.
Machine learning is particularly effective due to SonicWall sandboxing's threat intelligence database of approximately 7.1 billion entries.
One is that users can use the sandbox of SonicWall, which is called Capture ATP for free.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum | 0.9% |
| SonicWall Capture Client | 0.6% |
| Other | 98.5% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 14 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Optimum delivers straightforward defense-in-depth against complex and advanced threats with no additional overheads. Use automated and 'single-click' responses so you can ensure every last piece of the threat is rooted out of your system.
SonicWall Capture Client is a unified client platform that delivers multiple endpoint protection capabilities, including next-generation malware protection and application vulnerability intelligence. It leverages cloud sandbox file testing, comprehensive reporting, and enforcement for endpoint protection.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
