Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Kandji vs Microsoft 365 Business comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Kandji
Ranking in Mobile Device Management (MDM)
9th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (48th), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (16th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (52nd)
Microsoft 365 Business
Ranking in Mobile Device Management (MDM)
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
247
Ranking in other categories
Content Collaboration Platforms (11th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Mobile Device Management (MDM) category, the mindshare of Kandji is 3.1%, down from 8.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft 365 Business is 6.6%, down from 7.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Mobile Device Management (MDM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Microsoft 365 Business6.6%
Kandji3.1%
Other90.3%
Mobile Device Management (MDM)
 

Featured Reviews

Amit-Sarkar - PeerSpot reviewer
Apple Mobility Service Manager at ZONES PVT LTD
An easy-to-manage and deploy solution, but it should provide open customization
You don't need a certification or great knowledge to manage and deploy the solution because it's not complex. It's a very easy plug-and-play solution where you can just enroll the devices and choose the features you want. Kandji doesn't require much customization because it has built-in features that we have to create manually otherwise.
reviewer2587098 - PeerSpot reviewer
asc at a educational organization with 51-200 employees
Interconnectedness of tools boosts workflow efficiency but can improve on speed for larger files
One of the best features of Microsoft 365 Business is the interconnectivity; if I'm making a chart in Excel, I can paste it as a link on a PowerPoint. If there are any changes in the Excel data, when I update the link, that automatically gets changed in the PowerPoint. The interconnectedness with Excel and PowerPoint is a good feature. Using Teams helps our team's productivity because rather than having to make a proper chart again, if I am reviewing someone else's work and I find a mistake, I'll just do it in Excel and it automatically gets updated in the PPT. In Microsoft Teams, we can communicate with other team members by pinging them. We don't need to call and say what needs to be done. We can just share a screenshot, and we can share our files as well. Microsoft 365 Business has positively impacted our business because it's not a choice; it's something we need to comply with. It has become an industry standard, and the client always expects us to work with this kind of tool.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It's a very easy plug-and-play solution where you can just enroll the devices and choose the features you want."
"The good feature with the cloud is that you can access Microsoft Office from anywhere. It's integrated with Outlook, so you can edit a file in Excel, Word, or any other application and just attach it in the mail. It makes the business easier."
"The initial setup process is easy and fully web-based."
"The adaptability is very easy."
"Microsoft 365 Business includes SharePoint which is a really good tool. Plus, there are so many apps that you can integrate with this solution."
"The interface is now more user-friendly than the previous versions of Microsoft Office."
"I like that there's no maintenance involved."
"This is a user-friendly product that is easy to use."
"You can access files through any device at any corner of the world."
 

Cons

"Kandji should give open customization."
"Its price could be better for companies that are not using it massively."
"It should be more affordable."
"The cost estimation can be difficult."
"It would be ideal if there were fewer features. I'd like it better if it had a watered-down version where you didn't have to have all of this extra stuff included."
"I would like to see more security features included."
"Previously, it was on concurrent basis access, but currently, it's on named user access. That's the biggest challenge we have, but we are looking to integrate SharePoint whereby we can have a portal where we can have the non-core users access via Sharepoint. That's what I'm looking to have an update on. So the cost is a bit of an issue."
"The Teams feature should be more flexible in integrating with other communications products."
"Tech support is not that feasible. The Microsoft team is not easily accessible."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Users have to pay a yearly licensing fee for Kandji, which is expensive."
"Its price is what you would expect today from a software-as-a-service offering. It is somewhere around $10 per user per month."
"It has a subscription-based model, so we need to procure as many licenses as required as part of an enterprise agreement. It is a little bit expensive. It is definitely a bit more expensive than other solutions that are on-premises. It is also expensive as compared to the cloud-based solutions from other companies. However, when we look at the ease of use of the product and the adoption by the users, its cost can definitely be considered as comparable to other products. The features that we get in this solution are not available in solutions from its competitors."
"Its cost is fine because I have a lot of devices in my account."
"There is a license for this solution and it is priced based on the users using it."
"As a customer, I would like the licensing fees should be cheaper."
"The licenses are available for a fair price."
"Our licensing is annual. We have a Volume Licensing deal with them."
"The licenses could be cheaper."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile Device Management (MDM) solutions are best for your needs.
877,318 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
University
8%
Performing Arts
14%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Educational Organization
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business112
Midsize Enterprise44
Large Enterprise100
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Kandji?
It's a very easy plug-and-play solution where you can just enroll the devices and choose the features you want.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kandji?
Users have to pay a yearly licensing fee for Kandji, which is expensive.
What needs improvement with Kandji?
Kandji should have certification experience, which they don't have. Kandji should give open customization. Most customers find required features from other vendors, which Kandji doesn't have. It wo...
What do you like most about Microsoft 365 Business?
The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft 365 Business?
I have no idea about the pricing of Microsoft 365 Business, since I'm not the party concerned.
What needs improvement with Microsoft 365 Business?
I don't have knowledge about the benefits of Advanced Threat Protection within Microsoft 365 Business, such as the Defender, because I think we don't have that. Currently, I can't think of anything...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Microsoft 365 E3, Microsoft 365 E5, Microsoft 365 F1, MS 365 Business
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Urban Agriculture Co., The Detroit Wallpaper Co., TransBlue Facility Management, Garner Food Company
Find out what your peers are saying about JAMF, Cisco, Microsoft and others in Mobile Device Management (MDM). Updated: November 2025.
877,318 professionals have used our research since 2012.