Juniper vSRX vs Palo Alto Networks K2-Series comparison

Juniper and Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the Firewalls category. Juniper is ranked #27 with an average rating of 8.0, while Palo Alto Networks is ranked #36 with an average rating of 8.7. Juniper holds a 0.4% mindshare in Firewalls, compared to Palo Alto Networks’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Juniper users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Juniper vSRX and Palo Alto Networks K2-Series are both prominent solutions in the network security appliance space. Juniper vSRX is noted for its affordability and support, but many find Palo Alto Networks K2-Series's advanced features justify its higher price.

Features: Juniper vSRX provides comprehensive threat detection, high throughput, and robust support. Palo Alto Networks K2-Series offers advanced threat prevention, automation capabilities, and excels in dealing with complex security scenarios.

Room For Improvement: Users of Juniper vSRX suggest enhancements in integration, reporting functions, and compatibility. Palo Alto Networks K2-Series could improve its documentation, interface, and user engagement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Juniper vSRX is praised for its straightforward setup and excellent support, while Palo Alto Networks K2-Series, although having a steeper learning curve, receives substantial support post-deployment. Deployment of vSRX is easier, whereas K2-Series provides robust assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Juniper vSRX is cost-effective and offers a quicker ROI. Palo Alto Networks K2-Series has higher setup costs but is considered a valuable long-term investment. vSRX appeals to budget-conscious buyers, while K2-Series targets those prioritizing long-term security enhancements.

To learn more, read our detailed Juniper vSRX vs. Palo Alto Networks K2-Series Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Juniper vSRX vs. Palo Alto Networks K2-Series

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiGate

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Firewalls category, the mindshare of Fortinet FortiGate is 20.4%, up from 19.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Juniper vSRX is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks K2-Series is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Firewalls Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Fortinet FortiGate	20.4%
Juniper vSRX	0.4%
Palo Alto Networks K2-Series	0.1%
Other	79.1%

Firewalls

Featured Reviews

Vasu Gala

Manager, Information Technology Operation/Presales at TechMonarch

A stable solution with an intuitive interface and quick customer service

I have been working with Fortinet FortiGate, WatchGuard, Sophos, and SonicWall. I'm not as comfortable with SonicWall because of their UI and limitations. I prefer Fortinet above all other options. When it comes to configuration, I am confident in my ability to handle various tasks, including creating policies such as firewall rules, web policies, and application policies. Additionally, I can configure VPNs and implement load balancing, among other tasks. Overall, I feel much more comfortable working with Fortinet. Fortinet has made significant improvements by integrating AI with firewalls for threat analysis and prevention. In the past 2-3 years, they have launched FortiSASE and SIEM, and they also provide SOC services. Both Palo Alto and Fortinet FortiGate are excellent. While Fortinet FortiGate comes at higher prices, the functionality and support justify the cost. They promptly resolve firmware issues and inform all support providers about configuration changes.

Read full review

Stratos-Margaritis

Solutions Architect at Navarino SA

The ease of installation and licensing are also significant advantages

We use the application filtering, content filtering, and intrusion prevention system (IPS) features. These features are crucial for our network security. The ease of installation and licensing are also significant advantages, as it allows us to have one license for all products, which simplifies upgrading and maintenance. Additionally, the ease of deployment is critical for us.

Read full review

Krishnakumar M

enterprise architect at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

One of the best tools for the prevention of evasive threats

There is a feature called granular application controls, which I liked. Instead of relying on ports and IP addresses, they use AMP ID. This kind of solution is very good. Another valuable feature is the prevention of evasive threats, which is one of the best tools I've encountered. SSL decryption and app ID-based SSL decryption are also impressive, along with the integration with user ID. Identity-based policies ensuring only authorized users can access specific resources are excellent features. Normally, there is something called SIM or SCIM in IDA IDM, but this feature is provided on the box, which is exemplary.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"FortiGate Next Generation Firewall has a stateless balance proposition"

"I only deal with it from a security analyst's point of view. I don't really get into the features of the actual FortiGate. From the security point of view, it works, and it does its job."

"It is user friendly, and has all the features you need."

"FortiGate is a great solution, although initially, it faced challenges in the Brazilian market due to lower brand recognition than Cisco. However, explaining and demonstrating its product format and offerings has proven easy. The cost-effectiveness and better features of FortiGate have made some clients skeptical. We set up a trial period, and they eventually opted for it. Many clients were convinced it was great after experiencing the solution's capabilities firsthand."

"Whenever we raise a complaint with FortiGate, their response and resolution times are minimal."

"Fortinet FortiGate is a simple solution, and the integration with other solutions in the Fortinet portfolio, such as the Security Fabric integration, is competitive."

"The multi-tenancy feature is most valuable. It integrates very well with FortiManager and FortiAnalyzer."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the analytics."

More Fortinet FortiGate pros

"The pricing is reasonable."

"I like the role-based functions, but the device can now perform most of the tasks. We have open access to CLI. You can access it directly. Many vendors have also opened their CLI to Linux, making troubleshooting easier."

"The solution has good features."

"The initial setup was very straightforward. There was no problem. The initial deployment took about one hour."

"There are a few valuable features that offer very good quality on the solution. Especially NetScreen. We used to use NetScreen for the the product line. It was a very mature solution, very robust, easy to configure, easy to manage, etc. It made it easy to do everything."

"I'm told the solution is the fastest, and, so far, I do find that to be the case."

"Juniper is more flexible with the commit check and the commit confirmed command. The design of the forwarding and contract plan in the operating system is very important for the performance when we have very big traffic."

"The tool's most valuable features are routing features and service quality."

More Juniper vSRX pros

"One of the most valuable features is Palo Alto's firewall management. We find it easier to manage the firewall centrally."

"Palo Alto has better and finer controls than, say, Cisco or Check Point."

"This is a very reliable firewall and we have never had problems with it."

"The IPS system is the best in the field."

"The solution offers effective security features such as HIDS (Host-based Intrusion Detection System) in global products."

"The solution is reliable and scales well."

"I have found the threat profile feature valuable."

"We've found the solution offers us good stability."

More Palo Alto Networks K2-Series pros

Cons

"The cloud features and integration could be improved."

"The visibility of the network can be better. The GUI can be improved for better visibility of the network flow. Other solutions have better GUI in terms of network visibility."

"The reports are very basic."

"Fortinet FortiGate is a stable solution. However, my issue is the performance only. When I use all the profiles, this affects the performance. From the beginning, I should have had a better sizing of the box."

"The support we receive when we need to upgrade is not satisfactory and has room for improvement."

"The solution needs to integrate VPN features."

"The system can slow down when inspections are carried out."

"The built-in logging and reporting is limited without FortiAnalyzer."

More Fortinet FortiGate cons

"Juniper vSRX is expensive."

"We have some weird errors and some weird behavior on the solution occasionally. The device gets buggy without anyone touching it. It would work and then suddenly stop. Sometimes you need to just move the cards out and restart it again, and it will work. The solution itself, the hardware and the software, there must be some bugs that need to be dealt with."

"There are too many types of licenses, which can be confusing."

"They could provide support for cloud deployments."

"Some people complain that the solution tends to have a steep learning curve. It could be because most people have basic familiarity with Cisco or other similar products and maybe have never worked closely with Juniper products."

"The pricing still needs some improvement."

"I would like to see an activity sensor for malicious content or sensor for viruses and malware."

"The GUI really needs a lot of work, and it has got worse with successive version updates."

More Juniper vSRX cons

"Sometimes there are interactions with support or the provider that are not ideal."

"If we have issues, they take anywhere from two days to a week to respond. I even wrote to their CEO because there was no response. When it comes to support, this is the worst company."

"The ease of management and configuration should be improved."

"The technical support, and how they provide it to the client, needs to be improved."

"The scalability for on-premises version is limited as it depends on the model."

"Palo Alto doesn't have extended visibility to the end point in their firewalls."

"Palo Alto has many other products. It would be nice for these products to be centralized under one tool"

"I would like to see the threat intelligence capability integrated with other vendors such as Cisco and Forcepoint."

More Palo Alto Networks K2-Series cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing cost is at the intermediate level."

"The price of FortiGate is average and I would say that based on the top five products available on the market, it is in the affordable range."

"We pay about $4,000 for a yearly license, and there aren't any additional fees."

"It's a very full-featured and it's priced well solution."

"FortiGate Next Generation Firewall is a very cheap solution."

"It is around $50,000 per month."

"There is an annual license to use this solution. The prices have been increasing over the years."

"Fortinet bundles FortiGate with other products and because of this, the price is a little expensive to some SMB enterprises."

More Fortinet FortiGate pricing and cost advice

"It is not that costly."

"After some research, I think that the cost of Juniper is more than Check Point, Palo Alto, and Fortinet."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"The solution is pricey."

"The solution could have been cheaper."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

"As a customer, the pricing is good for us."

"We like pricing through the AWS Marketplace."

More Juniper vSRX pricing and cost advice

"It would be nice if they lowered their prices for small businesses."

"This is an expensive solution, although you will get value for the price."

"Palo Alto firewalls are very expensive."

"It is an expensive solution."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

"We are on an annual license to use Palo Alto Networks K2-Series."

"The pricing is expensive."

"This product is designed for large companies. The price would not be suitable for a small or medium size company."

More Palo Alto Networks K2-Series pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewalls solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

University

Performing Arts

24%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	350
Midsize Enterprise	130
Large Enterprise	187

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

Which is the better NGFW: Fortinet Fortigate or Cisco Firepower?

When you compare these firewalls you can identify them with different features, advantages, practices and usage a...

See all answers

What is the biggest difference between Sophos XG and FortiGate?

From my experience regarding both the Sophos and FortiGate firewalls, I personally would rather use FortiGate. I know...

See all answers

What are the biggest technical differences between Sophos UTM and Fortinet FortiGate?

As a solution, Sophos UTM offers a lot of functionality, it scales well, and the stability and performance are quite ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Juniper vSRX?

One of Juniper vSRX's most valuable features is its integration with safety applications. It keeps the software secur...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Juniper vSRX?

The pricing is competitive, being neither the most expensive nor the cheapest option. It falls within the medium to h...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Juniper vSRX?

I would suggest improving the pricing, particularly the licensing model. Although it is currently quite reasonable, m...

See all answers

Features comparison between Palo Alto and Fortinet firewalls

In the best tradition of these questions, Feature-wise both are quite similar, but each has things it's better at, it...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Palo Alto Networks K2-Series?

The pricing for the Palo Alto Networks K2-Series solution is affordable and there are no complaints about the licensing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks K2-Series?

The graphical user interface is a little complex and difficult to manage. L1 engineers cannot work on the Palo Alto N...

See all answers

Comparisons

Sophos XG vs Fortinet FortiGate

Compared 17% of the time

Cisco Secure Firewall vs Fortinet FortiGate

Compared 11% of the time

Netgate pfSense vs Fortinet FortiGate

Compared 9% of the time

OPNsense vs Fortinet FortiGate

Compared 4% of the time

Cisco Meraki MX vs Fortinet FortiGate

Compared 4% of the time

More Fortinet FortiGate Competitors

Cisco Meraki MX vs Juniper vSRX

Compared 10% of the time

Trend Micro Deep Security vs Juniper vSRX

Compared 10% of the time

Azure Firewall vs Juniper vSRX

Compared 10% of the time

Juniper SRX Series Firewall vs Juniper vSRX

Compared 9% of the time

OPNsense vs Juniper vSRX

Compared 9% of the time

More Juniper vSRX Competitors

Cisco Secure Firewall vs Palo Alto Networks K2-Series

Compared 52% of the time

Juniper SRX Series Firewall vs Palo Alto Networks K2-Series

Compared 48% of the time

More Palo Alto Networks K2-Series Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiGate

October 2025

Download Fortinet FortiGate product report

Buyer's Guide

Juniper vSRX

October 2025

Download Juniper vSRX product report

Buyer's Guide

Palo Alto Networks K2-Series

September 2025

Download Palo Alto Networks K2-Series product report

Overview

Fortinet FortiGate excels in providing integrated VPN, firewalling, and Unified Threat Management (UTM) with centralized management and high availability. It supports remote access and comprehensive threat protection, making it a preferred choice for securing networks.

Fortinet FortiGate offers a robust security platform with features such as strong intrusion prevention, application control, and web filtering. Its integration with Active Directory and SD-WAN functionality provides scalable solutions for large networks. Users appreciate its ease of use through centralized management interfaces, ensuring robust security with flexible configurations. However, FortiGate could enhance its graphical interface and technical support responsiveness, address firmware bugs and costly licensing, improve logging, integrate better with third-party tools, and strengthen scalability and memory for log storage. Complexity in configuration and the need for intuitive features are noted challenges, and there's a demand for advanced security, zero-trust capabilities, and AI integration.

What are the key features of Fortinet FortiGate?

VPN: Secure remote access and connectivity.
Firewalling: Protects networks from unauthorized access and attacks.
UTM: Offers a comprehensive approach to threat management.
SD-WAN: Optimizes traffic routing for efficient network performance.
Web Filtering: Controls and monitors web access and ensures Internet security.

What benefits or ROI should be considered?

Centralized Management: Simplifies administration and monitoring.
High Availability: Ensures consistent security and network availability.
Scalability: Adapts to the needs of growing networks.
Comprehensive Threat Protection: Provides robust security measures.
Ease of Use: Minimizes the complexity of security management.

Fortinet FortiGate is widely implemented across industries like education, finance, and government. Companies use it for firewall protection, VPN, and SD-WAN capabilities, ensuring secure perimeter and data center security. It facilitates remote access management and traffic routing optimization, offering reliable security and connectivity solutions.

Fortinet

Juniper vSRX is a virtualized security platform that provides advanced threat protection for virtualized and cloud environments. It offers a comprehensive set of security features, including firewall, VPN, intrusion prevention system (IPS), and unified threat management (UTM).

With its scalable architecture, the vSRX can be easily deployed and managed across multiple virtual machines, making it ideal for organizations with dynamic and distributed networks. It also supports high-performance data processing, ensuring minimal impact on network performance.

vSRX is designed to integrate seamlessly with Juniper's broader security ecosystem, enabling centralized management and visibility across the entire network.

Juniper

Designed to handle growing throughput needs due to increasing amounts of application-, user-, and device-generated data, the K2-Series offers amazing performance and threat prevention capabilities to stop advanced cyberattacks and secure mobile network infrastructure, subscribers, and services.

Palo Alto Networks

Sample Customers

Amazon Web Services, Microsoft, IBM, Cisco, Dell, HP, Oracle, Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile, Sprint, Vodafone, Orange, BT Group, Telstra, Deutsche Telekom, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, CenturyLink, NTT Communications, Tata Communications, SoftBank, China Mobile, Singtel, Telus, Rogers Communications, Bell Canada, Telkom Indonesia, Telkom South Africa, Telmex, Telia Company, Telkom Kenya

Expedient Data Centers

State of North Dakota, SEGA, Alameda County Office of Education, Temple University, VERGE, CAME

Buyer's Guide

Juniper vSRX vs. Palo Alto Networks K2-Series

September 2025

Free Report: Juniper vSRX vs. Palo Alto Networks K2-Series

Find out what your peers are saying about Juniper vSRX vs. Palo Alto Networks K2-Series and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Juniper vSRX vs. Palo Alto Networks K2-Series report.

See our list of best Firewalls vendors.

We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.