Juniper SRX Series Firewall vs McAfee StoneGate [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Juniper and McAfee are both solutions in the Firewalls category. Additionally, 86% of Juniper users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of McAfee users who would recommend it.

Juniper SRX Series Firewall

Read 95 Juniper SRX Series Firewall reviews

10,030 Views
8,826 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

McAfee StoneGate [EOL]

Read 3 McAfee StoneGate [EOL] reviews

66% willing to recommend

Juniper SRX Series Firewall

McAfee StoneGate [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Juniper SRX Series Firewall and McAfee StoneGate [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Cisco, Netgate and others in Firewalls.

To learn more, read our detailed Firewalls Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Firewalls

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 918,169 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Juniper SRX Series Firewall

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Firewalls (24th), Unified Threat Management (UTM) (7th)

McAfee StoneGate [EOL]

Average Rating

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

IhorShtanko

Technical Consultant Of Juniper Networks Division at MUK

Secure branch connectivity and automation have improved, but clustering and support still need work

I think Juniper SRX Series Firewall could be improved or enhanced because maybe a year or two ago, Juniper began producing new boxes such as SRX 1600, SRX 2300, and SRX 4300 and 4700, which are excellent products. They are only one unit high but have very good performance and a lot of different ports, supporting from 1 gig to 100 gig ports. Juniper also has series SRX 300, but it is an old firewall and not very powerful. I believe that maybe in a year, they will transition to another series, such as SRX 400. However, the functionality of Juniper SRX Series Firewall remains the same. The differences involve performance, quality, number of ports, and types of ports in different models of Juniper SRX Series Firewall.

Read full review

it_user935460

Computer Framework at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees

It works well with a highly-active cluster.

It is important for us in case of a disaster, or in case of a failure of one server. This means that the high availability is the most important part for us. It is important for us that the system is available and no connection is going to be lost if the system is restarting one note, or something like that. This is the main request for us for a good firewall protection product.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Juniper supports their products very well."

"Juniper is one of the most powerful network security solutions while remaining simple to use, set up, and scale."

"For the routers, every feature is quite essential and this is a complete router."

"In terms of valuable features, Juniper firewall filtering is good."

"We're primarily using Juniper's EPA feature, but not the other things. We use it to manage different points of firewalling of routing."

"The user interface is good."

"It helps us perform our daily jobs."

"If you require any particular rule that needs to be modified, any particular rule that needs to be fine-tuned, the solution will give you all the details regarding how to fine-tune the policy, including the destination, IP, et cetera."

More Juniper SRX Series Firewall pros

"High availability is very consistent and provides good firewalling and stability."

"It works well with a highly-active cluster."

"We did not have issues with scalabiliy."

"It has given us better application control."

"The stability of the product is fantastic; it is a really proven system and I never had any type of problem where the system was unstable or had a software failure."

Cons

"If a user needs a more sophisticated next generation firewall feature or threat intelligence themes, I'm not sure they'll get that with SRX devices."

"Improvements can be made to the GUI. The GUI can be improved by creating policies to handle IPS requirements. The configuration should be a one-step process. This would make it easier to complete the setup to register the time of operation."

"The reporting is lacking."

"it would be more powerful if Juniper brought out a security product other than the firewall, like anti-spam, endpoint protection, etc. Customers who want to deploy security solutions are not just thinking about firewalls... Juniper should have an end-to-end solution, from the endpoint to the network level."

"It would be good if Junos had "unique commands" between all hierarchical levels, discarding the use of the "Run" command."

"In some cases, customers encounter issues related to network interfaces, while others prioritize security concerns."

"We purchased three devices and all three have been replaced under RMA."

"J-Web, Juniper Web, is sometimes not working great when users are increasing their internet use. Additionally, they need to improve the GUI, graphical user interface, and the firewall management needs to improve. Their CLI is good, but sometimes the GUI is very slow."

More Juniper SRX Series Firewall cons

"The hardware needs improving as we had a lot of problems with the hard drive reliability, both with the firewall and the intrusion protection system."

"HA failover is not stable."

"After some experience with the solution, we had to do some redesign, but generally, we were happy with the product."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is very inexpensive which is the main reason I bought the solution. One device costs around 50 EUR through the University's vendor who is modernizing our network."

"When you consider performance, price, and features, maybe Juniper is not so cost-effective compared to other solutions like MikroTik."

"I find the price to be reasonable for an enterprise-level solution."

"It is not that expensive."

"In general, their price definitely couldn't be cheaper."

"The direct support with Juniper is expensive. When you stop using the solution and miss one year of payments, if you want the support back on a specific node, they ask you to pay for the year that you haven't used the node."

"The price is reasonable."

"Juniper SRX Series Firewall is worth its money."

More Juniper SRX Series Firewall pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewalls solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

918,169 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	47
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	32

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Juniper SRX?

The Juniper SRX Series Firewall is affordable and cost-effective. The cost depends on the use case; for firewalls, it's not per user, but for VPN Connect it is per user, while most other licenses a...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Juniper SRX?

The role-based control feature supported by Juniper SRX Series Firewall is usually a good solution, especially when using another database server or RADIUS server for authenticating different users...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Juniper SRX Series Firewall?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiGate vs Juniper SRX Series Firewall

Compared 14% of the time

Cisco Secure Firewall vs Juniper SRX Series Firewall

Compared 11% of the time

Check Point Quantum Force (NGFW) vs Juniper SRX Series Firewall

Compared 5% of the time

Sophos UTM vs Juniper SRX Series Firewall

Compared 5% of the time

Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security) vs Juniper SRX Series Firewall

Compared 5% of the time

More Juniper SRX Series Firewall Competitors

Cisco Secure Firewall vs McAfee StoneGate [EOL]

Compared 32% of the time

Check Point Quantum Force (NGFW) vs McAfee StoneGate [EOL]

Compared 28% of the time

Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security) vs McAfee StoneGate [EOL]

Compared 21% of the time

Sophos UTM vs McAfee StoneGate [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

NetFortris Hosted Firewall vs McAfee StoneGate [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

More McAfee StoneGate [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Juniper SRX Series Firewall

October 2026

Download Juniper SRX Series Firewall product report

Buyer's Guide

Firewalls

October 2026

Download McAfee StoneGate [EOL] product report

Also Known As

Juniper SRX

McAfee Next Generation Firewall, Stonesoft, Intel Next Generation Firewall, Intel Security StoneGate

Overview

Juniper SRX Series Firewall delivers high-speed performance and robust security services, offering seamless integration with third-party products and a user-friendly experience through its unified OS.

Juniper SRX Series Firewall excels in delivering stability, robust security, and high-speed performance. Known for its reliable routing and firewall capabilities, it ensures secure connectivity with IPsec VPN and offers a powerful CLI for configuration. High availability and centralized management enhance efficiency, while automation supports seamless operations. Despite these strengths, some users find its GUI outdated and integration with other systems challenging. There is room for improvement in scalability and intuitive configuration, while pricing and customer support need enhancements to compete with market leaders like Cisco and Fortinet.

What are the top features of Juniper SRX Series Firewall?

High-Speed Performance: Ensures fast and efficient network operations.
Robust Security Services: Provides comprehensive protection against threats.
Routing Capabilities: Delivers reliable and flexible network routing.
Ease of Integration: Supports connection with third-party products.
IPsec VPN: Offers secure connectivity for remote access.
Powerful CLI: Facilitates detailed and customized configurations.
High Availability: Guarantees continuous operation of network services.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Security: Offers strong defenses against cyber threats.
Operational Efficiency: Increases productivity through centralized management and automation.
Simplified User Experience: Reduces training time with a unified OS.
Flexible Deployment: Provides versatility for on-premises and cloud-based applications.

Juniper SRX Series Firewall finds application in sectors like finance, education, and telecommunications, focusing on site-to-site VPNs, remote work protection, and perimeter defense. It secures data centers and internal networks, provides network traffic encryption, and supports high-availability configurations and routing capabilities in both on-premises and cloud-integrated settings.

Juniper

StoneGate is a Highly Available Firewall/VPN. The StoneGate fault-tolerant VPN maintains sessions across multiple VPN devices and multiple Internet or network connections, regardless of device or connection failures. StoneGate provides Security, Manageability, Availability, and Scalability thus reducing network security complexity and costs. Stonesoft was the inventor of high availability for security solutions and a recognized leader in network security.

McAfee

Sample Customers

7-Eleven, AARNet Pty Ltd, Allegro Networks, alltours GmbH, Apollo Hotel Papendrecht, Armstrong Atlantic State University, Atlantech Online, Availity, Bajaj Capital, Baloise Insurance, BancABC, BAS Group, Black Lotus, Blue Box, Borealis, Carilion Clinic, Catholic Health System, CATV, Champlain College, Chinas Ministry of Railways, China University of Mining and Technology (CUMT), Cloud Dynamics, CloudSeeds, Cloudwatt, CODONiS, Colt Technology Services, Cork Internet Exchange, CSS Versicherung AG, CyrusOne, Danish Crown, Deloitte Belgium, Department of Energy, Divona Telecom, DQE Communications, DreamHost, European Government Agency, Expedient, Financial Market Information Services Provider, Fluidata, Fonality, Fox Sports, Global Financial Institution, Global Investment Bank, Global Investment Company, Energy Sciences Network (ESnet), Goethe University, HEAnet, High Performance Networks Inc., Hillenbrand

Avency, R€SLER Oberfl_chentechnik GmbH, MAUSER Group, CEMEX, Cegedim, Fusion Media Networks

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Cisco, Netgate and others in Firewalls. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

918,169 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Firewalls vendors and best Firewalls vendors.

We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.