Cisco Cloud Services Router vs Juniper MX Series Routers comparison

Cisco and Juniper are both solutions in the Routers category. Cisco is ranked #9, while Juniper is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6. Cisco holds a 3.5% mindshare in R, compared to Juniper’s 13.0% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Juniper users who would recommend it.

Cisco Cloud Services Router

Read 17 Cisco Cloud Services Router reviews

465 Views
442 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Juniper MX Series Routers

Read 34 Juniper MX Series Routers reviews

1,621 Views
1,345 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cisco Cloud Services Router

Juniper MX Series Routers

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 7, 2025

Juniper MX Series Routers and Cisco Cloud Services Router compete in the network infrastructure market. Juniper MX Series is preferred for its cost-effectiveness, while Cisco is noted for its advanced features and cloud integration.

Features: Juniper MX Series Routers offer advanced automation, flexible scalability, and superior traffic management capabilities. Cisco Cloud Services Router features cloud readiness, enhanced security, and seamless integration with cloud environments.

Room for Improvement: Juniper could improve cloud environment integration, expand security features, and streamline compatibility with third-party services. Cisco could focus on reducing complexity for non-cloud deployments, enhancing initial cost efficiency, and offering more flexible scalability options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Juniper MX Series Routers have a straightforward deployment process with strong customer support. Cisco Cloud Services Router provides a seamless cloud-based deployment with extensive support options.

Pricing and ROI: Juniper MX Series Routers offer competitive setup costs with promising ROI from enhanced network performance. Cisco Cloud Services Router, with a higher initial cost, delivers value with its extensive features, justifying the investment for businesses seeking more integrated solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Cloud Services Router vs. Juniper MX Series Routers Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Cloud Services Router vs. Juniper MX Series Routers

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Cloud Services Router

Ranking in Routers

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Juniper MX Series Routers

Ranking in Routers

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Carrier Grade Network Address Translation (CGNAT) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Routers category, the mindshare of Cisco Cloud Services Router is 3.5%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Juniper MX Series Routers is 13.0%, up from 12.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Routers Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Juniper MX Series Routers	13.0%
Cisco Cloud Services Router	3.5%
Other	83.5%

Routers

Featured Reviews

VENKATESHREDDY

Associate IT Director at Diligent Global

Manageable, provides excellent support, and easily integrates with other products

One central area for improvement in Cisco is its product line offering. Cisco has ISE and other products, such as DNS Center and other components. Instead of small to medium-sized customers purchasing devices and maintaining the devices, it would be great if customers could have subscriptions. A CAPEX/OPEX model instead of that Cisco code, where the pricing model is subscription-based, would give much better flexibility for the customers. The pricing and model for Cisco Cloud Services Router and other Cisco products could be improved. One good example of what I want to be added to the Cisco Cloud Services Router in its next version is for it to be more of a plug-and-play product. For example, Juniper has developed QR codes, so if you need to plug in a device, you scan from your phone and connect to the internet. That's it. You can provision the device remotely through the cloud orchestrator, so I want to see a similar function or feature in Cisco Cloud Services Router.

Read full review

Patrick Anaku

Senior Network Engineer at Roke Telkom

Performance excels with reliable uptime and robust features

The best features of Juniper MX Series Routers include their performance, which is quite good for us in terms of hardware performance. The Junos OS, the software, is stable, and we don't have many issues with the Juniper system itself. They have numerous features that allow us to deliver services, be it Layer 2 connectivity to customers, Layer 3 connectivity, data center connectivity, or even security features. Hardware performance has been a top-notch reason why we chose Juniper in the beginning, especially the MX series, which performs well in terms of network uptime and we don't encounter many failures. We have had a bad experience here and there with the ACX series, and their network performance is not so great compared to MX, so we have mostly done away with the ACX and only use MX at some of the core sites. I have seen a return on investment from the solution. Initially, we deployed MX80s on the network, and since our company has been in operation since 2006, from that point we used MX80s until around 2016 when we upgraded most of them to MX204s. From our experience, once we buy an MX204, we don't have issues with it; we have never had to replace an MX204 on the network. Once we deploy it, it works until we decide to upgrade the capacity. The return on investment is significant, as once we buy it, we have no worries about performance.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is definitely scalable. It can handle a lot more traffic and group work compared to any other products that I've evaluated. It could easily scale a lot more than what I'm doing right now."

"Overall, it is a solid product and a good router."

"The most valuable feature is the SNMP traps that I use to monitor the router and the availability of the network."

"The most valuable features of the Cisco Cloud Services Router are the integration with Amazon and Oracle cloud."

"It allowed us to create a more secure VPN than we would have been able to do without it."

"The most valuable feature of the Cisco Cloud Services Router is it can make your migrations smooth. For example, if you want to migrate to the cloud, but you don't want to change the IP. You can extend your VLAN from on-premise to the cloud without having to change the IP."

"The most valuable feature is the artificial intelligence assessment models."

"AWS has a reference architecture to enable the Cisco routers in high availability and Transit VPC. This is a very powerful router and can enable us to use Transit VPC in AWS, and this is a very powerful feature that we use."

More Cisco Cloud Services Router pros

"The solution is pretty easy to set up after a bit of training."

"I think that the extensions are very valuable. The way you can test the configuration before applying that configuration permanently is very helpful. The rollback configuration is also very useful."

"The stability of Juniper is better than Cisco's."

"The most valuable feature is the standard routing protocol."

"I would rate the stability a ten out of ten. We never had any issues."

"I would say it is very user-friendly."

"The solution's main features are its security and ease of use."

"In our company, we are integrators who create solutions for our customers. I find Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches to be suitable as it allows for easy configuration and offers features like SNMP. Personally, I find it convenient to switch from Cisco to Juniper EX because of my experience with various vendors like Huawei and Cisco. It's easy for me to read configurations from Cisco and transfer them to Juniper. Mainly, we work with customers who want to change or upgrade their network infrastructure, moving from vendors like Cisco, Aruba, or Huawei to Juniper for modernization. Juniper's features are more advanced, and it helps us meet the diverse needs of our customers. My role involves helping with the deployment and configuration of switching, access points, and Wi-Fi, for building robust and modern networks."

More Juniper MX Series Routers pros

Cons

"They have an online registration that happens after they pick up block months. If they could decrease to yearly or something, sometimes the device is not cell phone accessible. That becomes an issue or challenge for us. If that can be improved, that would be really great."

"The initial setup is easy for one device but is more complex when numerous devices need to be configured."

"It is too complex. It is not easy to set up, even with the documentation that they provided. It is a little confusing."

"It could grow or adapt to changes in the cloud. For example, cloud does not support autoscaling. When people want to grow, they have to do manual activities."

"If you lose connectivity to the cloud, it is difficult to establish connectivity between hub and spoke."

"A CAPEX/OPEX model, where the pricing model is subscription-based, would give much better flexibility for the customers. The pricing and model for Cisco Cloud Services Router and other Cisco products could be improved."

"There should be a system in place to help existing users make an easier transition to the newer interfaces."

"The ease of use within the AWS environment needs to improve. Sometimes, it is very esoteric in how you use it. Therefore, you have to learn to use it, then you are able to."

More Cisco Cloud Services Router cons

"While it is challenging to pinpoint specific areas for enhancement, there is room for better support and updates for Ansible."

"Juniper have addressed issues with the MX204, but it still has a limited number of interfaces. Ideally, it should support up to twenty or twenty-four interfaces to better serve smaller service providers. Additionally, the MX304 doesn't support subscriber management, also known as BNG, which I believe should be included."

"The initial setup is not easy."

"There is room for improvement in pricing. The product could be cheaper for smaller networks."

"Automation can also be improved."

"The pricing is a bit too high."

"Juniper must publish more information about Juniper MX Series Routers."

"It is not scalable, unfortunately."

More Juniper MX Series Routers cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cost is a big factor. We would like to see the price reduced."

"The price is a little high, more than what we wanted to pay. This is one area where we would like to understanding how the price could be brought down a bit more."

"Purchasing the product on the AWS Marketplace was very simplistic. Our organization was trying to centralize our billing costs, and simplicity was best."

"This solution is kind of expensive."

"The product is too expensive on the AWS Marketplace."

"Purchasing it through the AWS Marketplace was very simple. We went through the AWS Marketplace because it was the easiest way to get the product up and running very quickly."

"The should make the Dynamic Multipoint VPN solution more affordable."

"We would prefer to go through the vendor instead of AWS, as we have a relationship with the vendor and can get discounts directly from them. Going through the vendor, it is much cheaper for us. Though, we would still keep it hosted on AWS."

More Cisco Cloud Services Router pricing and cost advice

"I would rate it around a three. While I'm not deeply involved in pricing discussions, I believe it is comparatively more affordable than Cisco."

"An additional license can be purchased for support of a next-generation firewall."

"There is a license for this solution and the price is very competitive. The cost is less expensive than some competitors, such as Cisco. There are additional costs for support licenses."

"We have to pay for the device and licensing. The support service requires additional costs."

"The pricing of Juniper MX Series Routers is okay compared to other technologies."

"The price of this solution is better than other competitors, such as Cisco. We receive a lot of discounts which make the price less expensive and attractive."

"The solution is more expensive compared to other solutions."

"$300 to $400 is the hardware cost and for licensing cost, it may be around, for support and all, $100 per year."

More Juniper MX Series Routers pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Routers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

University

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Juniper MX Series Routers?

For the Juniper MX Series Routers, it plays a crucial role in our network. They offer numerous features, enabling multiple connections and handling various reports. The routers efficiently manage ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Juniper MX Series Routers?

I would rate it around a three. While I'm not deeply involved in pricing discussions, I believe it is comparatively more affordable than Cisco.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Juniper MX Series Routers?

The areas of Juniper MX Series Routers that have room for improvement include the port count; for instance, the MX204 has only four 40G or 100G ports, which is quite limited. While I know there are...

See all answers

Comparisons

MikroTik Routers and Switches vs Cisco Cloud Services Router

Compared 35% of the time

MikroTik Cloud Router Switch vs Cisco Cloud Services Router

Compared 29% of the time

HPE Enterprise Routers vs Cisco Cloud Services Router

Compared 23% of the time

ADTRAN NetVanta Routers and Switches vs Cisco Cloud Services Router

Compared 13% of the time

More Cisco Cloud Services Router Competitors

ACX Series Routers vs Juniper MX Series Routers

Compared 27% of the time

MikroTik Routers and Switches vs Juniper MX Series Routers

Compared 19% of the time

Huawei Enterprise Routers vs Juniper MX Series Routers

Compared 14% of the time

A10 Networks Thunder CGN vs Juniper MX Series Routers

Compared 14% of the time

Cisco Enterprise Routers vs Juniper MX Series Routers

Compared 9% of the time

More Juniper MX Series Routers Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Cloud Services Router

October 2025

Download Cisco Cloud Services Router product report

Buyer's Guide

Juniper MX Series Routers

September 2025

Download Juniper MX Series Routers product report

Also Known As

Cisco CSR, Cisco Cloud Services Router 1000v, Cisco CSR 1000v

Juniper Enterprise Routers, MX Series, Junos Address Aware

Overview

The Cisco Cloud Services Router is a reliable and scalable solution for extending network layers from the head office to the cloud, maintaining connections from branch offices through the cloud environment. Its most valuable features are its integration with Amazon and Oracle Cloud, its ability to smooth migrations without changing IP, and excellent technical support.

The product is stable, easy to integrate with other products, and offers a fantastic routing service for NPLS called Layer 3-IP. It has helped organizations by providing higher resilience solutions, centralized troubleshooting, and easy management of services on the infrastructure side.

Cisco

Juniper MX Series Routers are designed for high throughput with flexible MPLS configuration and robust policy management, offering reliability and scalability for enterprise needs. They feature seamless Cisco integration, strong performance driven by the Trio chipset, and user-friendly management.

Known for their exceptional performance, Juniper MX Series Routers enable enterprises and ISPs to expand network connectivity and efficiency. Their reliable hardware supports tasks like border routing and internet connectivity, catering to high-performance networking and automation. Trio chipset technology ensures stability, while interchangeable line cards maintain top-level performance. These routers are favored for their easy configuration and robust support, though improvements in pricing, VPN compatibility, and stronger DDoS protection are needed. Users seek additional cloud integration, enhanced security features, and expanded port options on models like the MX204.

What are the key features of Juniper MX Series Routers?

High Throughput: Ensures fast and efficient network data transfer.
Flexible MPLS Configuration: Adapts seamlessly to varied network environments.
Robust Policy Management: Provides extensive control over network traffic policies.
Seamless Cisco Integration: Simplifies operations for mixed equipment environments.
Trio Chipset Technology: Boosts performance and ensures network stability.
User-Friendly Interface: Facilitates easy configuration and management.

What benefits should users evaluate?

Scalability: Supports growing network needs without compromising performance.
Reliability: Offers consistent and dependable network operations.
Support and Documentation: Access to comprehensive resources for efficient management.
Performance: Maintains high levels of throughput and stability for enterprise needs.
Automation Support: Streamlines network operations for greater efficiency.

In industries like telecommunications and data centers, Juniper MX Series Routers are widely implemented to manage complex networking tasks such as VPNs, MPLS, and BGP deployments. Service providers often rely on these routers for backbone roles, benefitting from their performance and scalability to maintain robust and efficient network infrastructures.

Juniper

Sample Customers

Under Armour, HealthSparq, Adobe

AARNet Pty Ltd, Allegro Networks, Atlantech Online, Availity, Baloise Insurance, Black Lotus, CATV, Blue Box

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Cloud Services Router vs. Juniper MX Series Routers

September 2025

Free Report: Cisco Cloud Services Router vs. Juniper MX Series Routers

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Cloud Services Router vs. Juniper MX Series Routers and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Cloud Services Router vs. Juniper MX Series Routers report.

See our list of best Routers vendors.

We monitor all Routers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.