Cisco Cloud Services Router vs Juniper MX Series Routers comparison

Cisco and Juniper are both solutions in the Routers category. Cisco is ranked #9, while Juniper is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6. Cisco holds a 3.4% mindshare in R, compared to Juniper’s 13.2% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Juniper users who would recommend it.

Cisco Cloud Services Router

Read 17 Cisco Cloud Services Router reviews

446 Views
428 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Juniper MX Series Routers

Read 34 Juniper MX Series Routers reviews

1,700 Views
1,462 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cisco Cloud Services Router

Juniper MX Series Routers

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 7, 2025

Juniper MX Series Routers and Cisco Cloud Services Router compete in the network infrastructure market. Juniper MX Series is preferred for its cost-effectiveness, while Cisco is noted for its advanced features and cloud integration.

Features: Juniper MX Series Routers offer advanced automation, flexible scalability, and superior traffic management capabilities. Cisco Cloud Services Router features cloud readiness, enhanced security, and seamless integration with cloud environments.

Room for Improvement: Juniper could improve cloud environment integration, expand security features, and streamline compatibility with third-party services. Cisco could focus on reducing complexity for non-cloud deployments, enhancing initial cost efficiency, and offering more flexible scalability options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Juniper MX Series Routers have a straightforward deployment process with strong customer support. Cisco Cloud Services Router provides a seamless cloud-based deployment with extensive support options.

Pricing and ROI: Juniper MX Series Routers offer competitive setup costs with promising ROI from enhanced network performance. Cisco Cloud Services Router, with a higher initial cost, delivers value with its extensive features, justifying the investment for businesses seeking more integrated solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Cloud Services Router vs. Juniper MX Series Routers Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Cloud Services Router vs. Juniper MX Series Routers

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Cloud Services Router

Ranking in Routers

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Juniper MX Series Routers

Ranking in Routers

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Carrier Grade Network Address Translation (CGNAT) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Routers category, the mindshare of Cisco Cloud Services Router is 3.4%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Juniper MX Series Routers is 13.2%, up from 11.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Routers

Featured Reviews

VENKATESHREDDY

Associate IT Director at Diligent Global

Manageable, provides excellent support, and easily integrates with other products

One central area for improvement in Cisco is its product line offering. Cisco has ISE and other products, such as DNS Center and other components. Instead of small to medium-sized customers purchasing devices and maintaining the devices, it would be great if customers could have subscriptions. A CAPEX/OPEX model instead of that Cisco code, where the pricing model is subscription-based, would give much better flexibility for the customers. The pricing and model for Cisco Cloud Services Router and other Cisco products could be improved. One good example of what I want to be added to the Cisco Cloud Services Router in its next version is for it to be more of a plug-and-play product. For example, Juniper has developed QR codes, so if you need to plug in a device, you scan from your phone and connect to the internet. That's it. You can provision the device remotely through the cloud orchestrator, so I want to see a similar function or feature in Cisco Cloud Services Router.

Read full review

Kushtrim Arifi

Engineering Executive at Telos Labs

Highly scalable, especially suitable for complex and large-scale network deployments

The "Commit" feature stands out. When you try to commit commands, you have some options like sandbox config, leaving those temporary for 60 seconds. This feature allows you to commit configuration changes to the candidate configuration, and then review them for errors before committing them to the active configuration. Another feature that I like is the integration with Cisco routers. This allows you to connect Juniper MX routers to Cisco routers and have them work together seamlessly. We never have interoperability issues.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The bandwidth and throughput are pretty good."

"It provides peace of mind because it is a stable product that you aren't going to lose sleep over at night wondering if it will be running or not."

"What's best about Cisco Cloud Services Router is the support. It's excellent, and so far, no significant challenges. Another valuable feature of the product is easy integration with other products."

"It is definitely scalable. It can handle a lot more traffic and group work compared to any other products that I've evaluated. It could easily scale a lot more than what I'm doing right now."

"It seems pretty stable. We have never had any issues with it."

"It integrates well with the other products we're using. We have it with multiple windows like Palo Alto, Arista and it easily integrated with them."

"The most valuable feature of the Cisco Cloud Services Router is it can make your migrations smooth. For example, if you want to migrate to the cloud, but you don't want to change the IP. You can extend your VLAN from on-premise to the cloud without having to change the IP."

"The routing service for NPLS called Layer 3-IP is fantastic."

More Cisco Cloud Services Router pros

"I would say it is very user-friendly."

"The full Internet DGP is a valuable feature."

"It's one of the more stable routers."

"The solution's main features are its security and ease of use."

"Juniper's custom Trio chipset drives their MX routers, offering superior performance. Juniper's design separates the control plane and the forwarding plane, which is a key aspect of their architecture. This separation provides high throughput, maintaining line-rate performance across the MX platform."

"Juniper Enterprise Routers has a CLR and it's more reliable and faster than others."

"The stability of Juniper is better than Cisco's."

"The solution is quite stable. We've found it to be very good. There aren't bugs, glitches, or crashes."

More Juniper MX Series Routers pros

Cons

"It could grow or adapt to changes in the cloud. For example, cloud does not support autoscaling. When people want to grow, they have to do manual activities."

"I would like some deployment examples and guides specific to AWS VPCs and how to separate your subnets. Then, how they tie-in with the Internet gateway and any NAT services that we are running on our VPC. This would be extremely helpful."

"It is too complex. It is not easy to set up, even with the documentation that they provided. It is a little confusing."

"You can use this router in a scalable solution but it has its limitations."

"They have an online registration that happens after they pick up block months. If they could decrease to yearly or something, sometimes the device is not cell phone accessible. That becomes an issue or challenge for us. If that can be improved, that would be really great."

"Technical support could be better. I am missing a single pane of glass, where I can see all the connections, etc."

"The ease of use within the AWS environment needs to improve. Sometimes, it is very esoteric in how you use it. Therefore, you have to learn to use it, then you are able to."

"Cisco Cloud Services Router could improve by having more features. It is lacking features, such as virtualization and containerization. Additionally, there should be increased security and connectivity between routers."

More Cisco Cloud Services Router cons

"In terms of improvement, I would like for it to effectively protect against the broadcast storms, multicast storms, and DDoS attacks."

"It is not scalable, unfortunately."

"We'd like them to be capable of adding firewall options to the license."

"Juniper Enterprise Routers could improve by adding a graphical user interface(GUI). They do not have one. Most of our team has to have a background or expertise in Juniper. When compared to other solutions, they have a GUI. It will be easier for new team members to get familiar with, configure, or set up the router. Additionally, adding some monitoring tools would help us."

"Juniper must publish more information about Juniper MX Series Routers."

"The pricing is a bit too high."

"Enhancing the capacity would be a welcome improvement."

"There are areas for improvement in Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches. One aspect that could be enhanced is the pricing; many clients acknowledge the quality of Juniper switches but find the pricing challenging, especially when compared to competitors like Huawei. Additionally, from a feature perspective, there's a desire for improved clarity and ease of configuration in Juniper switches. Some users find it difficult to understand and configure certain aspects, necessitating the use of external tools. This complexity, especially for Internet service providers, can be a barrier. Addressing these concerns could further strengthen the position of Juniper switches in the market."

More Juniper MX Series Routers cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is too expensive on the AWS Marketplace."

"The price is a little high, more than what we wanted to pay. This is one area where we would like to understanding how the price could be brought down a bit more."

"You do need to pay a licensing fee to use the solution. You can do a yearly or three-year subscription. The product itself is quite expensive. It would be ideal if they offered the product at a cheaper price."

"Purchasing through the AWS Marketplace was easy. It was almost a one-click process to purchase CSR."

"The cost needs improvement. It is very expensive through the AWS Marketplace."

"The pricing is fine, though it might have been cheaper going through a partner or doing a direct buy."

"This solution is kind of expensive."

"The should make the Dynamic Multipoint VPN solution more affordable."

More Cisco Cloud Services Router pricing and cost advice

"I would rate the pricing model a seven out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. It is not cheap."

"The pricing of Juniper MX Series Routers is okay compared to other technologies."

"The prices for Juniper MX Series Routers are reasonable."

"The solution is more expensive compared to other solutions."

"$300 to $400 is the hardware cost and for licensing cost, it may be around, for support and all, $100 per year."

"I would rate it around a three. While I'm not deeply involved in pricing discussions, I believe it is comparatively more affordable than Cisco."

"There is a license for this solution and the price is very competitive. The cost is less expensive than some competitors, such as Cisco. There are additional costs for support licenses."

"The price of this solution is better than other competitors, such as Cisco. We receive a lot of discounts which make the price less expensive and attractive."

More Juniper MX Series Routers pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Routers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

11%

University

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Juniper MX Series Routers?

For the Juniper MX Series Routers, it plays a crucial role in our network. They offer numerous features, enabling multiple connections and handling various reports. The routers efficiently manage ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Juniper MX Series Routers?

I would rate it around a three. While I'm not deeply involved in pricing discussions, I believe it is comparatively more affordable than Cisco.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Juniper MX Series Routers?

The areas of Juniper MX Series Routers that have room for improvement include the port count; for instance, the MX204 has only four 40G or 100G ports, which is quite limited. While I know there are...

See all answers

Comparisons

MikroTik Routers and Switches vs Cisco Cloud Services Router

Compared 36% of the time

MikroTik Cloud Router Switch vs Cisco Cloud Services Router

Compared 36% of the time

HPE Enterprise Routers vs Cisco Cloud Services Router

Compared 28% of the time

More Cisco Cloud Services Router Competitors

ACX Series Routers vs Juniper MX Series Routers

Compared 29% of the time

MikroTik Routers and Switches vs Juniper MX Series Routers

Compared 22% of the time

Huawei Enterprise Routers vs Juniper MX Series Routers

Compared 16% of the time

A10 Networks Thunder CGN vs Juniper MX Series Routers

Compared 13% of the time

Cisco Enterprise Routers vs Juniper MX Series Routers

Compared 8% of the time

More Juniper MX Series Routers Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Cloud Services Router

August 2025

Download Cisco Cloud Services Router product report

Buyer's Guide

Juniper MX Series Routers

August 2025

Download Juniper MX Series Routers product report

Also Known As

Cisco CSR, Cisco Cloud Services Router 1000v, Cisco CSR 1000v

Juniper Enterprise Routers, MX Series, Junos Address Aware

Overview

The Cisco Cloud Services Router is a reliable and scalable solution for extending network layers from the head office to the cloud, maintaining connections from branch offices through the cloud environment. Its most valuable features are its integration with Amazon and Oracle Cloud, its ability to smooth migrations without changing IP, and excellent technical support.

The product is stable, easy to integrate with other products, and offers a fantastic routing service for NPLS called Layer 3-IP. It has helped organizations by providing higher resilience solutions, centralized troubleshooting, and easy management of services on the infrastructure side.

Cisco

Juniper MX Series Routers are designed for high throughput with flexible MPLS configuration and robust policy management, offering reliability and scalability for enterprise needs. They feature seamless Cisco integration, strong performance driven by the Trio chipset, and user-friendly management.

Known for their exceptional performance, Juniper MX Series Routers enable enterprises and ISPs to expand network connectivity and efficiency. Their reliable hardware supports tasks like border routing and internet connectivity, catering to high-performance networking and automation. Trio chipset technology ensures stability, while interchangeable line cards maintain top-level performance. These routers are favored for their easy configuration and robust support, though improvements in pricing, VPN compatibility, and stronger DDoS protection are needed. Users seek additional cloud integration, enhanced security features, and expanded port options on models like the MX204.

What are the key features of Juniper MX Series Routers?

High Throughput: Ensures fast and efficient network data transfer.
Flexible MPLS Configuration: Adapts seamlessly to varied network environments.
Robust Policy Management: Provides extensive control over network traffic policies.
Seamless Cisco Integration: Simplifies operations for mixed equipment environments.
Trio Chipset Technology: Boosts performance and ensures network stability.
User-Friendly Interface: Facilitates easy configuration and management.

What benefits should users evaluate?

Scalability: Supports growing network needs without compromising performance.
Reliability: Offers consistent and dependable network operations.
Support and Documentation: Access to comprehensive resources for efficient management.
Performance: Maintains high levels of throughput and stability for enterprise needs.
Automation Support: Streamlines network operations for greater efficiency.

In industries like telecommunications and data centers, Juniper MX Series Routers are widely implemented to manage complex networking tasks such as VPNs, MPLS, and BGP deployments. Service providers often rely on these routers for backbone roles, benefitting from their performance and scalability to maintain robust and efficient network infrastructures.

Juniper

Sample Customers

Under Armour, HealthSparq, Adobe

AARNet Pty Ltd, Allegro Networks, Atlantech Online, Availity, Baloise Insurance, Black Lotus, CATV, Blue Box

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Cloud Services Router vs. Juniper MX Series Routers

July 2025

Free Report: Cisco Cloud Services Router vs. Juniper MX Series Routers

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Cloud Services Router vs. Juniper MX Series Routers and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Cloud Services Router vs. Juniper MX Series Routers report.

See our list of best Routers vendors.

We monitor all Routers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.