Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs Omada Access Points comparison

Juniper and TP-Link are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Juniper is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.5, while TP-Link is ranked #16 with an average rating of 7.9. Juniper holds a 5.7% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to TP-Link’s 3.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Juniper users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TP-Link users who would recommend it.
Juniper Mist Wireless Acces...
Read 20 Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points reviews
  • 5,860 Views
  • 4,608 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Omada Access Points
Read 15 Omada Access Points reviews
  • 4,243 Views
  • 3,405 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

Omada Access Points and Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points compete in the wireless networking market. Omada offers budget-friendly options, while Juniper Mist appeals to businesses needing advanced features and technology.

Features: Omada Access Points are known for affordability, ease of installation, and reliable standard management features suitable for smaller deployments. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points feature AI-driven network management, detailed analytics, and enhanced security, supporting complex network environments effectively.

Room for Improvement: Omada Access Points could enhance their advanced feature set, provide more sophisticated analytics, and improve scalability for large networks. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points might improve cost-effectiveness, streamline the interface for easier use, and expand integration with additional third-party solutions to boost flexibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Omada Access Points offer a straightforward plug-and-play setup, benefiting organizations with limited tech support. Juniper Mist delivers sophisticated tools powered by AI, simplifying deployment and boosting performance, with their customer service noted for efficiency and quick problem resolution.

Pricing and ROI: Omada Access Points are attractive for cost-effective projects with low initial costs and satisfactory ROI. Despite higher costs, Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points offer a robust ROI through improved reliability and performance, making them appealing for enterprises seeking advanced networking solutions.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs. Omada Access Points Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs. Omada Access Points
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Juniper Mist Wireless Acces...
Ranking in Wireless LAN
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
8.2
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Omada Access Points
Ranking in Wireless LAN
16th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points is 5.7%, up from 4.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Omada Access Points is 3.8%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Wireless LAN
 

Featured Reviews

Raihan Hossain - PeerSpot reviewer
Consistently manages user capacity and satisfaction with ease
I have completed over twenty projects using Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points ( /products/juniper-mist-wireless-access-points-reviews ), and I continue to see exceptional performance in the areas of user capacity, user experience, and user satisfaction. This makes Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points highly recommended if the customer's budget allows, as the hardware performance is also very good. From my perspective, the Juniper reporting logs are clear and provide necessary data, which supports better management and diagnosis.
Read full review
Prasad Wijesooriya - PeerSpot reviewer
Well-suited for mobile and portable device usage but issues with stability
The problem is that when the number of users increases, TP-Link automatically drops the speed, and in terms of coverage, it falls short. We are not using any industrial-level equipment or accuracy. We are looking for something at the industrial level, advanced Access Points, not the basic ones from TP-Link. Omada Access Points could be improved in terms of connectivity and speed. That is the main thing. The other thing is security. Currently, most people are sharing their passwords, allowing unauthorized users to access Wi-Fi networks. So, the main areas for improvement are security, accessibility, and speed.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The artificial intelligence feature is very good."
"The solution is stable."
"Juniper Mist offers valuable features like comprehensive network insight, granular policy control, fast device setup, strong security, and efficient SSL traffic management."
"In terms of reporting, in terms of all the user reports, it's very rich."
"Overall, we've been very pleased with the performance."
"The product is quite user-friendly and easy to deploy, so one should definitely consider buying it."
"It provides private network access, helping us protect our company’s devices."
"It's well-detailed in terms of troubleshooting logs."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points pros
"Omada is easy to manage, has cloud management features, and is easy to set up."
"The most valuable feature of TP-Link Auranet EAP is its high performance."
"We use Omada Access Points for the network and Wi-Fi."
"The initial setup is not complicated."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"When this solution is set up, it is solid. It offers fast deployment."
"The solution's most valuable feature is its price."
"Omada is a good solution that I would recommend, and it is less expensive while providing good results."
More Omada Access Points pros
 

Cons

"The pricing should be made cheaper."
"It would be helpful to have even stronger security features to help protect against interference from other nearby access points that aren't part of our network."
"I need a bit more time with it before criticizing the features."
"Improvement is needed in the user-friendliness of Juniper Mist, particularly in enhancing the interaction with AI features."
"Improving third-party integration is key for Juniper Mist's next release."
"Supporting multiple protocols would be beneficial."
"The price could be better."
"Enrolling into the tool is a tedious process."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points cons
"Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover."
"The solution takes a long time to switch to another connection, which should be improved."
"The technical support could be improved."
"Omada's ordering platform could be improved, though. Some of their distributors are a pain to work with."
"We have some issues with stability. It is not so fast. That is the main problem."
"TP-Link Auranet EAP is not very efficient, they need to improve it."
"There is room for wider improvements and additional features to enhance managing capabilities."
"Aruba has better scaling capabilities."
More Omada Access Points cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is something Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) can work on. The pricing is very high compared to the competition."
"I rate the pricing an eight out of ten."
"I rate Juniper Mist's pricing a ten out of ten since it is expensive."
"The solution is expensive."
"Juniper Wireless AP's price is a little more expensive than other solutions, but you get what you pay for."
"The pricing is too high."
"If a customer has a budget of around five lakhs in Indian currency, they can afford Juniper products."
"The pricing is fair."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points pricing and cost advice
"The price is affordable, and we haven't had any additional costs due to having a limited number of users."
"The cost of Omada is much better than Aruba and Cisco, and it does what we need it to do in most cases. Around 10 percent of our clients need a more carrier-grade solution for mobile platforms."
"We don't have to pay for the license because the solution has no subscription cost."
"TP-Link provides solutions that are more cost-effective than other well-known brands."
"On a scale of one to ten for pricing, with one being cheap and ten being expensive, I would rate Omada Access Points at a one for its cost-effectiveness."
"There is no need to pay for the licensing costs since my company is in South Africa. Omada Access Points can be termed as a medium-priced product."
"The cost is about 500 Brazilian real per access point, with no additional recurring costs."
"TP-Link is a good price. They have a good price. But technology-wise, it has to be better."
More Omada Access Points pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Computer Software Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Government
7%
Educational Organization
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series)?
The solution is very secure.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series)?
The price is very high, which is why not all enterprises can purchase this product.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series)?
The reporting logs require improvement in terms of clarity because it can be difficult to find specific information about network influences.
See all answers
What do you like most about TP-Link Auranet EAP?
We don't have any issues 90 percent of the time. It works fine in most situations. It has been a success story for delivering WiFi services in Romania. Our customers are happy, and I've been satisf...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Omada Access Points?
Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover. I am looking for an access point that can cover long distances.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Omada Access Points?
I am trying to design a wireless network with Omada equipment. I have deployed Omada in office areas, and now I want to deploy it in a hotel. The company size where I usually deploy is medium-sized...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Logo
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points
Compared 38% of the time
Aruba Wireless vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Logo
Aruba Wireless vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points
Compared 18% of the time
Ruckus Wireless vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Logo
Ruckus Wireless vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points
Compared 16% of the time
Cisco Wireless vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Logo
Cisco Wireless vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points
Compared 8% of the time
Mist AI and Cloud vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Logo
Mist AI and Cloud vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points
Compared 1% of the time
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Competitors
Aruba Instant vs Omada Access Points Logo
Aruba Instant vs Omada Access Points
Compared 20% of the time
Ruckus Wireless vs Omada Access Points Logo
Ruckus Wireless vs Omada Access Points
Compared 19% of the time
Ubiquiti WLAN vs Omada Access Points Logo
Ubiquiti WLAN vs Omada Access Points
Compared 10% of the time
Cisco Wireless vs Omada Access Points Logo
Cisco Wireless vs Omada Access Points
Compared 9% of the time
ExtremeWireless vs Omada Access Points Logo
ExtremeWireless vs Omada Access Points
Compared 1% of the time
More Omada Access Points Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points
April 2025
Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points reportDownload Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points product report
Buyer's Guide
Omada Access Points
April 2025
Omada Access Points reportDownload Omada Access Points product report
 

Also Known As

Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series), Mist Access Points
TP-Link Auranet EAP, TP-Link EAP, Auranet EAP, Auranet
 

Overview

Juniper Wireless Access Points work in conjunction with Juniper Mist Cloud Services and Mist AI to deliver premier wireless access capabilities. The Juniper Mist Edge extends microservices to the campus to bring agility and scale while enabling new applications at the edge.

Juniper

Omada access points provide a business-class wireless network solution that’s flexible, manageable, secure, and easy-to-deploy. The free EAP Controller software allows users to manage hundreds of EAPs at multiple sites, all from a single location. The ability to control, adjust and visualize the entire network from any connected PC makes centralized business Wi-Fi management more efficient than ever before. Omada EAPs also feature captive portal and advanced RF management functions, which make them ideal for demanding, high-traffic environments such as campuses, hotels, malls and offices.

TP-Link
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Reflections Resort,Sim Lim Square, Hotel Mary Colombia, Peru WISP, Chase Grammer School
Buyer's Guide
Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs. Omada Access Points
April 2025
Free Report: Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs. Omada Access Points
Find out what your peers are saying about Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs. Omada Access Points and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs. Omada Access Points report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.