We performed a comparison between JD Edwards World and SAP S/4HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The ease of use is consistently there."
"It has worked fine for many years."
"The most valuable feature for me is the traceability customization, which allows me to track the movement and history of artifacts in our ecosystem."
"The most valuable feature of JD Edwards World is its ease of use and unique functions."
"I like that JD Edwards World is perfect for my use cases, but what I like best about it is its navigation."
"The pricing is okay. It's not overly expensive."
"Menu creation is easier now."
"We've found the initial setup to be easy."
"I have found the most valuable feature to be the SAP Fiori application."
"SAP S4HANA version 1909 is stable. We have not gone live with 2020 yet."
"SAP S4HANA is a robust solution."
"The most valuable feature is the detail in all of the processes. The solution captures our policies and enables us to implement our policies in SAP. There are different models that address our needs."
"It's helped with business aspects and improved material planning and RMA processes."
"The most valuable feature is that HANA loads from memory, which means it loads very quickly."
"From a technology standpoint, the theory and analytics are fascinating."
"It is a very powerful, highly customizable tool."
"Update interface capabilities and data maintenance tools to modern standards."
"The pricing for JD Edwards World could be more affordable so that it could be available to a broader audience. My clients want more analytics or data analysis features from JD Edwards World."
"There is no support from Oracle here. We only have third-party support."
"I would like report creation to be easier."
"Improvements are needed in transitioning JD Edwards World to a more stable and reliable cloud product, particularly in terms of GDPR and data privacy compliance."
"The integration technology could be stronger at this point."
"World is old, so everybody is looking to just upgrade or migrate from it."
"Its end of life is already announced, so I don't expect lots of improvement coming from the product anywhere anymore."
"SAP support provides resolves all our problems, but the response time is slower than our customers expect. Maybe it's because they have such a large customer base and are always occupied, but that's one area all our customers mention."
"The solution could improve by making customization easier. The on-premise version is a lot more flexible."
"Technical support has been declining. They aren't as responsive as they used to be."
"The user interface should be much more convenient and user-friendly."
"SAP S/4HANA could improve by making the interface easier to use."
"It is simple to implement SAP S4HANA. If you are already in this type of environment, then the transition is not very complex. However, if you do not then it can be difficult."
"The common issues being raised right now by the end users are mostly related to the usability."
"We are always looking for a better user experience. We would like to see more consolidation in SAP S4HANA because of all the financial compliance and regulatory changes."
JD Edwards World is ranked 16th in ERP with 11 reviews while SAP S/4HANA is ranked 2nd in ERP with 65 reviews. JD Edwards World is rated 8.0, while SAP S/4HANA is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of JD Edwards World writes "A good legacy solution that is reliable and has good support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP S/4HANA writes "The solution is highly scalable, with solid performance and integration". JD Edwards World is most compared with JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, SAP ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite and Pronto Xi, whereas SAP S/4HANA is most compared with SAP ERP, SAP Business One, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and Oracle E-Business Suite. See our JD Edwards World vs. SAP S/4HANA report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.