

Oracle WebLogic Server and Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform both compete in the Java application server category. WebLogic holds an edge due to features like strong administration capabilities and clustering, despite JBoss's cost-effectiveness and integration flexibility.
Features: WebLogic offers a robust administration console, reliable clustering capabilities, and production redeployment for uninterrupted updates. Key optimizations include Exalogic for performance enhancement and Active Grid Link for Oracle RAC databases. JBoss is praised for its modular architecture, scalability, and high availability, with strong integration support making it a flexible choice for developers.
Room for Improvement: WebLogic struggles with slow startups, complex setups, and high licensing costs. Users also cite volatile updates and integration challenges. JBoss, while affordable, faces issues with documentation, frequent crashes, and deployment complexities, with demands for better logging and modern tech stack support.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: WebLogic is stable with extensive support but requires complex deployment efforts and significant setup. Oracle's customer service is comprehensive but expensive. JBoss is advantageous for flexible deployments in both on-premises and hybrid cloud environments, although user feedback indicates a need for improved support response times and technical assistance.
Pricing and ROI: WebLogic tends to incur higher initial and licensing costs, with its enterprise-grade positioning justified by strong ROI in centralized application management. JBoss's open-source nature offers a more accessible pricing model, with flexible licensing and a subscription approach yielding cost efficiency and reduced downtime, enhancing overall ROI.
For an existing migration project which was stipulated for a timeline of six months, it just took around two and a half months, specifically 80 days.
This flexibility translates to a lower total cost of ownership.
We have the portal, which is appropriately escalated based on the severity of the ticket.
I would rate customer service and support from Oracle for this product as either nine or ten.
Users can find discussions about common problems, solutions, and documentation within the community.
They need to be quicker in resolving issues related to Red Hat JBoss.
We receive support from RDS and Red Hat, and the response time and quality meet our expectations.
I find Oracle WebLogic Server to be highly scalable, rating it as nine out of ten.
The biggest benefit I see from Oracle WebLogic Server is that it is beneficial; we are stable through a large volume of transactions.
The scalability of Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) is pretty good, with minimum and maximum machines required being very efficient.
It is quite stable for our needs.
Using scripting allows for the creation of resources.
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) can be improved by integrating different services related to Azure and AWS.
From a support point of view, whatever support we get from IBM for Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) and for Red Hat, we are fine.
Making it lighter and more modular would probably be beneficial.
We are working with an embedded license; for us, it is acceptable, but in reality, the open full license will be costly because it is a number-of-core-based licensing.
If we are charging around 0.75 cents per hour for a virtual machine on AWS, then in the Red Hat JBoss orchestrator, charges have seen significant improvement at around 0.58 cents.
JBoss is the cheaper option out of the three when compared to WebSphere and WebLogic.
The price is somewhat high for an enterprise, however, it depends on organizational negotiations.
I can expand the cluster by creating more servers and several clusters within the same domain.
I am able to have a highly scalable, highly demanding, enterprise deployment.
The most valuable feature for my team is containerization and Jenkins integration because Jenkins integration helps us eradicate code smells and build pipeline reports.
Built-in metrics and subsystem isolation, where every subsystem logging, messaging, or web services can be tuned independently, provide fine-grained control over performance and behavior.
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) has impacted my organization positively because it is a powerful platform and we can develop powerful applications very quickly.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) | 14.1% |
| Oracle WebLogic Server | 13.5% |
| Other | 72.4% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 17 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 20 |
Oracle WebLogic Server is a powerful enterprise application server renowned for hosting and managing Java-based applications. Its robust infrastructure supports seamless deployment, making it suitable for both on-premises and cloud environments.
Oracle WebLogic Server provides a comprehensive solution for enterprise Java deployments, offering strong integration capabilities with Oracle technologies and other enterprise systems. It features a versatile administration console and robust clustering that ensure high scalability, stability, and reliability. Known for its comprehensive monitoring tools, WebLogic Server ensures that applications perform optimally, while its flexibility and ease of management make it a preferred choice for many enterprises. Despite its high pricing and certain challenges like start-up times and configuration complexities, it remains a strong choice for organizations needing reliable, high-performance application hosting. Oracle's efforts to address patch management, error handling, and memory management continue to evolve, aiming to enhance overall efficiency and security.
What are the key features of Oracle WebLogic Server?Oracle WebLogic Server is predominantly deployed in industries needing robust application hosting and management, such as banking, e-commerce, insurance, and financial services. Its reliability and adaptability make it suitable for internal applications, ERP solutions, and load distribution tasks. Organizations utilize it for SOAP solutions and develop platforms both on-premises and in the cloud, benefiting from its powerful integration with Oracle Service Bus and efficient management of client-specific environments.
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) provides scalable, secure, and reliable infrastructure for Java applications, offering high availability, modular architecture, and smooth integration with new technologies.
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) is tailored for deploying and managing web and application servers, with a strong focus on Java applications, APIs, and core business systems. It ensures easy setup and cost-effectiveness, accommodating high availability and clustering enhancements like session replication via Infinispan. While managing configurations and deployments effectively, EAP facilitates flexible deployment modes and enhanced security using OpenID Connect. However, areas needing improvement include customization options, runtime diagnostics, integration capabilities, documentation, and technical support. Automation needs expansion, pricing options could be more competitive, and better alignment with Jakarta EE is suggested for modernization.
What are the standout features of Red Hat JBoss EAP?Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) finds application across industries such as finance, web development, and enterprise middleware services. Its capabilities are demonstrated in managing banking transactions, supporting legacy systems, integrating with external APIs, and fulfilling enterprise needs in installation, configuration, automation, and security tasks.
We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.