Ixia BreakingPoint vs Snyk comparison

Keysight Technologies and Snyk are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #35, while Snyk is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.7. Keysight Technologies holds a 0.2% mindshare in SAST, compared to Snyk’s 4.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Snyk users who would recommend it.

Ixia BreakingPoint

Read 8 Ixia BreakingPoint reviews

723 Views
17 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Snyk

Read 47 Snyk reviews

7,682 Views
543 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Ixia BreakingPoint

Snyk

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 4, 2025

Ixia BreakingPoint and Snyk compete in cybersecurity but address different needs. Ixia specializes in network security testing, and Snyk excels in application security. Snyk’s advanced features increase its appeal for application security needs.

Features: Ixia BreakingPoint offers advanced network traffic and threat simulation, comprehensive malware database, and DDoS testing module. Snyk excels in application vulnerability detection, CI/CD pipeline integration, and automated pull request for vulnerability fixes.

Room for Improvement: Ixia could improve deployment simplicity, enhance UI usability, and expand cloud compatibility. Snyk could benefit from expanding its vulnerability database, improving license management, and offering more in-depth remediation guidance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ixia BreakingPoint’s technical complexity can complicate deployment, but strong customer service compensates for this challenge. Snyk's cloud-based model simplifies integration, with responsive support tailored for developers increasing its usability.

Pricing and ROI: Ixia BreakingPoint involves higher initial investments, typically recouped through network security efficiency. Snyk provides cost-effective SaaS pricing that delivers notable ROI for application-centric enterprises, benefiting those using continuous security practices.

To learn more, read our detailed Ixia BreakingPoint vs. Snyk Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ixia BreakingPoint vs. Snyk

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ixia BreakingPoint

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

35th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Snyk

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (5th), Cloud Management (16th), Container Security (5th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (2nd), Software Development Analytics (2nd), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (16th), DevSecOps (2nd), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Ixia BreakingPoint is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Snyk is 4.5%, down from 5.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Sai Prasad

Staff QA Engineer at Virsec

Works better for testing traffic, mix profile, and enrollment scenarios than other solutions

Once, when I raised a ticket regarding a hardware or software issue, the solution's support team visited our company to discuss and find out ways to solve the problem. Sometimes, they asked us to send several photos from the back and front end to identify the issue. It was time-consuming as we were occupied with some other testing simultaneously. Instead, it would have been great if they could have visited our company and rectified the problem.

Read full review

meetharoon

CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Affordable tool boosts code scanning efficiency but faces integration hurdles

The most important feature of Snyk is its cost-effectiveness compared to other solutions such as Check Point. It is easy to consolidate Snyk across multiple entities within a large organization. Additionally, our integration of Snyk into GitHub allows us to automatically scan codebases and identify issues, which has improved efficiency.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"There is a virtual version of the product which is scaled to 100s of virtual testing blades."

"The DDoS testing module is useful and quick to use."

"It is a scalable solution."

"I like that we can test cloud applications."

"The solution has many protocols and options, making it very flexible."

"We use Ixia BreakingPoint for Layer 7 traffic generation. That's what we like."

"The most valuable feature of Ixia BreakingPoint is the ransomware and malware database for simulated attacks."

"The CLI feature is quite useful because it gives us a lot of flexibility in what we want to do. If you use the UI, all the information is there and you can see what Snyk is showing you, but there is nothing else that you can change. However, when you use the CLI, then you can use commands and can get the output or response back from Snyk. You can also take advantage of that output in a different way. For the same reason, we have been using the CLI for the hard gate in the pipeline: Obtain a particular CDSS score for vulnerability. Based on that information, we can then decide if we want to block or allow the build. We have more flexibility if we use the CLI."

"What is valuable about Snyk is its simplicity."

"The solution has great features and is quite stable."

"Our overall security has improved. We are running fewer severities and vulnerabilities in our packages. We fixed a lot of the vulnerabilities that we didn't know were there."

"I am impressed with the product's security vulnerability detection. My peers in security are praising the tool for its accuracy to detect security vulnerabilities. The product is very easy to onboard. It doesn't require a lot of preparation or prerequisites. It's a bit of a plug-and-play as long as you're using a package manager or for example, you are using a GitHub repository. And that is an advantage for this tool because developers don't want to add more tools to what they're currently using."

"From a compliance and visibility reporting perspective, the fact that it can be applicable for multi-cloud environments is very helpful."

"We have integrated it into our software development environment. We have it in a couple different spots. Developers can use it at the point when they are developing. They can test it on their local machine. If the setup that they have is producing alerts or if they need to upgrade or patch, then at the testing phase when a product is being built for automated testing integrates with Snyk at that point and also produces some checks."

"Snyk is a developer-friendly product."

More Snyk pros

Cons

"The quality of the traffic generation could be improved with Ixia BreakingPoint, i.e. to get closer to being accurate in what a real user will do."

"I would appreciate some preconfigured network neighborhoods, which are predefined settings for testing networks."

"The integration could improve in Ixia BreakingPoint."

"The solution originally was hard to configure; I'm not sure if they've updated this to make it simpler, but if not, it's something that could be streamlined."

"The production traffic simulations are not realistic enough for some types of DDoS attacks."

"They should improve UI mode packages for the users."

"The price could be better."

"For the areas that they're new in, it's very early stages for them. For example, their expertise is in looking at third-party components and packages, which is their bread-and-butter and what they've been doing for ages, but for newer features such as static analysis I don't think they've got compatibility for all the languages and frameworks yet."

"It would be great if they can include dynamic, interactive, and run-time scanning features. Checkmarx and Veracode provide dynamic, interactive, and run-time scanning, but Snyk doesn't do that. That's the reason there is more inclination towards Veracode, Checkmarx, or AppScan. These are a few tools available in the market that do all four types of scanning: static, dynamic, interactive, and run-time."

"The log export function could be easier when shipping logs to other platforms such as Splunk."

"Basically the licensing costs are a little bit expensive."

"Could include other types of security scanning and statistical analysis"

"The reporting mechanism of Snyk could improve. The reporting mechanism is available only on the higher level of license. Adjusting the policy of the current setup of recording this report is something that can improve. For instance, if you have a certain license, you receive a rating, and the rating of this license remains the same for any use case. No matter if you are using it internally or using it externally, you cannot make the adjustment to your use case. It will always alert as a risky license. The areas of licenses in the reporting and adjustments can be improve"

"It would be ideal if there was customization with a focus on specific cybersecurity areas or capabilities."

"The tool needs improvement in license compliance. I would like to see the integration of better policy management in the product's future release. When it comes to the organization that I work for, there are a lot of business units since we are a group of companies. Each of these companies has its specific requirements and its own appetite for risk. This should be able to reflect in flexible policies. We need to be able to configure policies that can be adjusted later or overridden by the business unit that is using the product."

More Snyk cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is high. We pay for the license monthly."

"The solution is expensive."

"or us, the pricing is somewhere around $12,000 a year. I'm unsure as to what new licenses now cost."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

"We have a one year subscription license for $25,000 US Dollars."

"There is no differentiation in licenses for Breaking Point. For one license, you will get all the features. There is no complexity in that."

"Cost-wise, it's similar to Veracode, but I don't know the exact cost."

"The price is good. Snyk had a good price compared to the competition, who had higher pricing than them. Also, their licensing and billing are clear."

"It's inexpensive and easy to license. It comes in standard package sizing, which is straightforward. This information is publicly found on their website."

"Their licensing model is fairly robust and scalable for our needs. I believe we have reached a reasonable agreement on the licensing to enable hundreds of developers to participate in this product offering. The solution is very tailored towards developers and its licensing model works well for us."

"You can get a good deal with Snyk for pricing. It's a little expensive, but it is worth it."

"Presently, my company uses an open-source version of the solution. The solution's pricing can be considered quite reasonable owing to the features they offer."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing a three. It is a cheap solution."

"The solution is less expensive than Black Duck."

More Snyk pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Snyk compare with SonarQube?

Snyk does a great job identifying and reducing vulnerabilities. This solution is fully automated and monitors 24/7 to find any issues reported on the internet. It will store dependencies that you a...

See all answers

What do you like most about Snyk?

The most effective feature in securing project dependencies stems from its ability to highlight security vulnerabilities.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Snyk?

There are a lot of false positives that need to be identified and separated. The inclusion of AI to remove false positives would be beneficial. So far, I've not seen any AI features to enhance vuln...

See all answers

Comparisons

Spirent CyberFlood vs Ixia BreakingPoint

Compared 81% of the time

Synopsys Defensics vs Ixia BreakingPoint

Compared 19% of the time

More Ixia BreakingPoint Competitors

GitHub Advanced Security vs Snyk

Compared 11% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Snyk

Compared 8% of the time

Trivy vs Snyk

Compared 8% of the time

Wiz vs Snyk

Compared 8% of the time

Black Duck vs Snyk

Compared 6% of the time

More Snyk Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

June 2025

Download Ixia BreakingPoint product report

Buyer's Guide

Snyk

May 2025

Download Snyk product report

Also Known As

No data available

Fugue

Overview

By simulating real-world legitimate traffic, distributed denial of service (DDoS), exploits, malware, and fuzzing, BreakingPoint validates an organization’s security infrastructure, reduces the risk of network degradation by almost 80%, and increases attack readiness by nearly 70%.

Keysight Technologies

Snyk's AI Trust Platform empowers developers to innovate securely in AI-driven environments, ensuring rapid and secure software development with enhanced policy governance.

Snyk’s platform integrates AI-ready engines across the software development lifecycle, offering broad coverage with high speed and accuracy essential for fast-paced coding environments. AI-driven features include visibility, prioritization, and tailored security policies that enable proactive threat prevention and quick remediation. By focusing on LLM engineering and AI code analysis, Snyk supports secure and productive development processes. The platform's partnerships, including GenAI code assistants, enhance AI application security by addressing new threats and code velocity challenges.

What are the key features of Snyk?

Easy Integration: Snyk integrates with CI/CD pipelines, GitHub, and JIRA for seamless security management.
Multilingual Support: It offers extensive programming language support, enhancing project compatibility.
Actionable Insights: Provides accurate vulnerability detection with actionable remediation guidance.
Cloud and Container Security: Offers comprehensive checks for cloud and container environments, improving security posture.
Automation & Notifications: Automates vulnerability alerts and notifications for early threat identification in development.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Time Efficiency: Speeds up development by identifying and fixing vulnerabilities early in the software lifecycle.
Risk Reduction: Minimizes security risks with extensive vulnerability scanning and proactive alerting.
Productivity Boost: Enhances productivity by integrating security directly into developers' workflows.
Improved Compliance: Aids in maintaining license compliance and managing open-source dependencies effectively.

Snyk is implemented across industries focusing on agile development and DevSecOps, enhancing software delivery speed and security. It is widely used for continuous monitoring and adherence to security and licensing standards, especially in environments relying on Docker image security and CI/CD pipeline integration.

Snyk

Sample Customers

Corsa Technology

StartApp, Segment, Skyscanner, DigitalOcean, Comic Relief

Buyer's Guide

Ixia BreakingPoint vs. Snyk

June 2025

Free Report: Ixia BreakingPoint vs. Snyk

Find out what your peers are saying about Ixia BreakingPoint vs. Snyk and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ixia BreakingPoint vs. Snyk report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.