Ixia BreakingPoint vs Snyk comparison

Keysight Technologies and Snyk are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #34, while Snyk is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.8. Keysight Technologies holds a 0.3% mindshare in SAST, compared to Snyk’s 4.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Snyk users who would recommend it.

Ixia BreakingPoint

Read 8 Ixia BreakingPoint reviews

788 Views
678 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Snyk

Read 48 Snyk reviews

20,249 Views
6,885 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Ixia BreakingPoint

Snyk

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 4, 2025

Ixia BreakingPoint and Snyk compete in cybersecurity but address different needs. Ixia specializes in network security testing, and Snyk excels in application security. Snyk’s advanced features increase its appeal for application security needs.

Features: Ixia BreakingPoint offers advanced network traffic and threat simulation, comprehensive malware database, and DDoS testing module. Snyk excels in application vulnerability detection, CI/CD pipeline integration, and automated pull request for vulnerability fixes.

Room for Improvement: Ixia could improve deployment simplicity, enhance UI usability, and expand cloud compatibility. Snyk could benefit from expanding its vulnerability database, improving license management, and offering more in-depth remediation guidance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ixia BreakingPoint’s technical complexity can complicate deployment, but strong customer service compensates for this challenge. Snyk's cloud-based model simplifies integration, with responsive support tailored for developers increasing its usability.

Pricing and ROI: Ixia BreakingPoint involves higher initial investments, typically recouped through network security efficiency. Snyk provides cost-effective SaaS pricing that delivers notable ROI for application-centric enterprises, benefiting those using continuous security practices.

To learn more, read our detailed Ixia BreakingPoint vs. Snyk Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ixia BreakingPoint vs. Snyk

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ixia BreakingPoint

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

34th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Snyk

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (5th), Cloud Management (15th), Container Security (6th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (2nd), Software Development Analytics (2nd), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (16th), DevSecOps (2nd), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Ixia BreakingPoint is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Snyk is 4.7%, down from 5.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Sai Prasad

Staff QA Engineer at Virsec

Works better for testing traffic, mix profile, and enrollment scenarios than other solutions

Once, when I raised a ticket regarding a hardware or software issue, the solution's support team visited our company to discuss and find out ways to solve the problem. Sometimes, they asked us to send several photos from the back and front end to identify the issue. It was time-consuming as we were occupied with some other testing simultaneously. Instead, it would have been great if they could have visited our company and rectified the problem.

Read full review

meetharoon

CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Affordable tool boosts code scanning efficiency but faces integration hurdles

The most important feature of Snyk is its cost-effectiveness compared to other solutions such as Check Point. It is easy to consolidate Snyk across multiple entities within a large organization. Additionally, our integration of Snyk into GitHub allows us to automatically scan codebases and identify issues, which has improved efficiency.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a scalable solution."

"The solution has many protocols and options, making it very flexible."

"The most valuable feature of Ixia BreakingPoint is the ransomware and malware database for simulated attacks."

"There is a virtual version of the product which is scaled to 100s of virtual testing blades."

"I like that we can test cloud applications."

"We use Ixia BreakingPoint for Layer 7 traffic generation. That's what we like."

"The DDoS testing module is useful and quick to use."

"Snyk categorizes the level of vulnerability into high, medium, and low, which helps organizations prioritize which issues to tackle first."

"Snyk has given us really good results because it is fully automated. We don't have to scan projects every time to find vulnerabilities, as it already stores the dependencies that we are using. It monitors 24/7 to find out if there are any issues that have been reported out on the Internet."

"The dependency checks of the libraries are very valuable, but the licensing part is also very important because, with open source components, licensing can be all over the place. Our project is not an open source project, but we do use quite a lot of open source components and we want to make sure that we don't have surprises in there."

"Our overall security has improved. We are running fewer severities and vulnerabilities in our packages. We fixed a lot of the vulnerabilities that we didn't know were there."

"Snyk helps me pinpoint security errors in my code."

"From the software composition analysis perspective, it first makes sure that we understand what is happening from a third-party perspective for the particular product that we use. This is very difficult when you are building software and incorporating dependencies from other libraries, because those dependencies have dependencies and that chain of dependencies can go pretty deep. There could be a vulnerability in something that is seven layers deep, and it would be very difficult to understand that is even affecting us. Therefore, Snyk provides fantastic visibility to know, "Yes, we have a problem. Here is where it ultimately comes from." It may not be with what we're incorporating, but something much deeper than that."

"The product's most valuable features are an open-source platform, remote functionality, and good pricing."

"It has improved our vulnerability rating and reduced our vulnerabilities through the tool during the time that we've had it. It's definitely made us more aware, as we have removed scoping for existing vulnerabilities and platforms since we rolled it out up until now."

More Snyk pros

Cons

"The solution originally was hard to configure; I'm not sure if they've updated this to make it simpler, but if not, it's something that could be streamlined."

"They should improve UI mode packages for the users."

"The integration could improve in Ixia BreakingPoint."

"The quality of the traffic generation could be improved with Ixia BreakingPoint, i.e. to get closer to being accurate in what a real user will do."

"The price could be better."

"The production traffic simulations are not realistic enough for some types of DDoS attacks."

"I would appreciate some preconfigured network neighborhoods, which are predefined settings for testing networks."

"It can be improved from the reporting perspective and scanning perspective. They can also improve it on the UI front."

"There is always more work to do around managing the volume of information when you've got thousands of vulnerabilities. Trying to get those down to zero is virtually impossible, either through ignoring them all or through fixing them. That filtering or information management is always going to be something that can be improved."

"It would be helpful if we get a recommendation while doing the scan about the necessary things we need to implement after identifying the vulnerabilities."

"We tried to integrate it into our software development environment but it went really badly. It took a lot of time and prevented the developers from using the IDE. Eventually, we didn't use it in the development area... I would like to see better integrations to help the developers get along better with the tool. And the plugin for the IDE is not so good. This is something we would like to have..."

"DAST has shortcomings, and Snyk needs to improve and overcome such shortcomings."

"It would be great if they can include dynamic, interactive, and run-time scanning features. Checkmarx and Veracode provide dynamic, interactive, and run-time scanning, but Snyk doesn't do that. That's the reason there is more inclination towards Veracode, Checkmarx, or AppScan. These are a few tools available in the market that do all four types of scanning: static, dynamic, interactive, and run-time."

"They need to improve the Snyk plugins and make it easier to make your optimizations based on your own needs or features."

"It would be ideal if there was customization with a focus on specific cybersecurity areas or capabilities."

More Snyk cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."

"There is no differentiation in licenses for Breaking Point. For one license, you will get all the features. There is no complexity in that."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

"The price is high. We pay for the license monthly."

"We have a one year subscription license for $25,000 US Dollars."

"or us, the pricing is somewhere around $12,000 a year. I'm unsure as to what new licenses now cost."

"Cost-wise, it's similar to Veracode, but I don't know the exact cost."

"Snyk is a premium-priced product, so it's kind of expensive. The big con that I find frustrating is when a company charges extra for single sign-on (SSO) into their SaaS app. Snyk is one of the few that I'm willing to pay that add-on charge, but generally I disqualify products that charge an extra fee to do integrated authentication to our identity provider, like Okta or some other SSO. That is a big negative. We had to pay extra for that. That little annoyance aside, it is expensive. You get a lot out of it, but you're paying for that premium."

"We do have some missing licenses issues, especially with non-SPDX compliant one, but we expect this to be fixed soon"

"I would rate the pricing of Snyk at two. I'm currently using the free version, which the company offers before buying the full version. So, the price is affordable, especially for an enterprise."

"The product's price is okay."

"I didn't think the price was that great, but it wasn't that bad, either. I'd rate their pricing as average in the market."

"The solution is less expensive than Black Duck."

"With Snyk, you get what you pay for. It is not a cheap solution, but you get a comprehensiveness and level of coverage that is very good. The dollars in the security budget only go so far. If I can maximize my value and be able to have some funds left over for other initiatives, I want to do that. That is what drives me to continue to say, "What's out there in the market? Snyk's expensive, but it's good. Is there something as good, but more affordable?" Ultimately, I find we could go cheaper, but we would lose the completeness of vision or scope. I am not willing to do that because Snyk does provide a pretty important benefit for us."

More Snyk pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Snyk compare with SonarQube?

Snyk does a great job identifying and reducing vulnerabilities. This solution is fully automated and monitors 24/7 to find any issues reported on the internet. It will store dependencies that you a...

See all answers

What do you like most about Snyk?

The most effective feature in securing project dependencies stems from its ability to highlight security vulnerabilities.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Snyk?

There are a lot of false positives that need to be identified and separated. The inclusion of AI to remove false positives would be beneficial. So far, I've not seen any AI features to enhance vuln...

See all answers

Comparisons

Spirent CyberFlood vs Ixia BreakingPoint

Compared 73% of the time

Defensics Fuzzing vs Ixia BreakingPoint

Compared 17% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Ixia BreakingPoint

Compared 10% of the time

More Ixia BreakingPoint Competitors

GitHub Advanced Security vs Snyk

Compared 11% of the time

Trivy vs Snyk

Compared 9% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Snyk

Compared 8% of the time

Wiz vs Snyk

Compared 7% of the time

Black Duck vs Snyk

Compared 5% of the time

More Snyk Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

August 2025

Download Ixia BreakingPoint product report

Buyer's Guide

Snyk

July 2025

Download Snyk product report

Also Known As

No data available

Fugue

Overview

By simulating real-world legitimate traffic, distributed denial of service (DDoS), exploits, malware, and fuzzing, BreakingPoint validates an organization’s security infrastructure, reduces the risk of network degradation by almost 80%, and increases attack readiness by nearly 70%.

Keysight Technologies

Snyk's AI Trust Platform empowers developers to innovate securely in AI-driven environments, ensuring rapid and secure software development with enhanced policy governance.

Snyk’s platform integrates AI-ready engines across the software development lifecycle, offering broad coverage with high speed and accuracy essential for fast-paced coding environments. AI-driven features include visibility, prioritization, and tailored security policies that enable proactive threat prevention and quick remediation. By focusing on LLM engineering and AI code analysis, Snyk supports secure and productive development processes. The platform's partnerships, including GenAI code assistants, enhance AI application security by addressing new threats and code velocity challenges.

What are the key features of Snyk?

Easy Integration: Snyk integrates with CI/CD pipelines, GitHub, and JIRA for seamless security management.
Multilingual Support: It offers extensive programming language support, enhancing project compatibility.
Actionable Insights: Provides accurate vulnerability detection with actionable remediation guidance.
Cloud and Container Security: Offers comprehensive checks for cloud and container environments, improving security posture.
Automation & Notifications: Automates vulnerability alerts and notifications for early threat identification in development.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Time Efficiency: Speeds up development by identifying and fixing vulnerabilities early in the software lifecycle.
Risk Reduction: Minimizes security risks with extensive vulnerability scanning and proactive alerting.
Productivity Boost: Enhances productivity by integrating security directly into developers' workflows.
Improved Compliance: Aids in maintaining license compliance and managing open-source dependencies effectively.

Snyk is implemented across industries focusing on agile development and DevSecOps, enhancing software delivery speed and security. It is widely used for continuous monitoring and adherence to security and licensing standards, especially in environments relying on Docker image security and CI/CD pipeline integration.

Snyk

Sample Customers

Corsa Technology

StartApp, Segment, Skyscanner, DigitalOcean, Comic Relief

Buyer's Guide

Ixia BreakingPoint vs. Snyk

July 2025

Free Report: Ixia BreakingPoint vs. Snyk

Find out what your peers are saying about Ixia BreakingPoint vs. Snyk and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ixia BreakingPoint vs. Snyk report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.