We performed a comparison between Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall and Wallarm NG WAF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."The most valuable aspect of this solution is that it is simple to deploy. The deployment took us ten minutes."
"Helps us to monitor situation in regards to attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them."
"In terms of what needs improvement, the price could be lowered. We've tried to deploy more of them but our purchasing department has said that they're way too expensive and they would prefer to use something else."
"The biggest problem for us was the stability and speed using the first version of Wallarm. Now, it is fine."
Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall is ranked 44th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) while Wallarm NG WAF is ranked 33rd in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall is rated 9.0, while Wallarm NG WAF is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall writes "Good feature set and is simple to deploy ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wallarm NG WAF writes "Active threat detection and adaptive rules are the most valuable for us". Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), NGINX Plus, Citrix NetScaler, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway and Avi Networks Software Load Balancer, whereas Wallarm NG WAF is most compared with Salt Security, Noname Security, AWS WAF, F5 Advanced WAF and Cloudflare.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.