• Home
  • Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall vs. Threatx

Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall vs Threatx comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall and Threatx based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF).
To learn more, read our detailed Web Application Firewall (WAF) Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Good feature set and is simple to deploy
Use Threatx?
Ranking
44th
out of 82 in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Views
139
Comparisons
103
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
40th
out of 82 in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Views
175
Comparisons
132
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Pulse vWAF, Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager
Learn More
Ivanti
Threatx
Video Not Available
Overview

Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall delivers scalable application security for off-the-shelf and custom applications, including third-party frameworks. Apply business rules to online traffic, inspect and block attacks such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting (XSS), and filter outgoing traffic and data to mask credit card data. Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall helps achieve compliance with PCI-DSS requirements.

ThreatX’s attacker-centric approach against DDoS, Bot-based attacks, API abuse, exploitations of vulnerabilities, zero-day attacks, and more – provides unique, multi-layered detection capabilities to accurately identify malicious actors and respond. The ease of deploying ThreatX and the availability of our application security experts makes ThreatX the perfect blend of a product and a service to protect your web applications and APIs from today’s modern threat landscape.
Sample Customers
Gilt Groupe
BMC
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company21%
Financial Services Firm16%
Government8%
Performing Arts6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company14%
Financial Services Firm13%
Insurance Company8%
Manufacturing Company6%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise71%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise19%
Large Enterprise58%
Buyer's Guide
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall is ranked 44th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) while Threatx is ranked 40th in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall is rated 9.0, while Threatx is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall writes "Good feature set and is simple to deploy ". On the other hand, Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), NGINX Plus, Citrix NetScaler, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway and Avi Networks Software Load Balancer, whereas Threatx is most compared with Cloudflare, AWS WAF and Salt Security.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.