No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Ivanti ITSM vs Tray.io comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 3, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
4.8
Ivanti ITSM delivers significant ROI, boosting efficiency and first call close rates, but report customization poses user challenges.
Sentiment score
5.8
Tray.io boosts efficiency by reducing redundant tasks, saving 40+ hours weekly, and eliminating the need for engineer integration hours.
I have seen a return on investment as the company has been renewing the product for the entire 19 months we have been using it, which indicates that trust is high and they likely see value and advantage in using the system.
Principal AI and Data Science Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
It has even eliminated a position on our team because that person was no longer needed once we started the automations.
Applications Analyst at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The ROI is clear, as it eliminates hundreds of engineer hours required to build and maintain custom integration connectors, while empowering client partners to manage complex data ingest self-sufficiently.
Dev Ops Engineer at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.3
Ivanti ITSM support is generally well-regarded, but users highlight issues with response times and potential extra costs.
Sentiment score
4.3
Tray.io is user-friendly, reducing support needs; feedback highlights adequate direct support and praised newsletters and updates.
Ivanti is very responsive and releases new features and updates in a timely manner.
Manager - Technical Support at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
I have never used the customer support for Tray.io because the software is very easy to use and we never needed to contact support.
Principal AI and Data Science Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
Ivanti ITSM and Automation effectively support scalable deployments for businesses of all sizes, receiving positive feedback for seamless integration.
Sentiment score
7.3
Tray.io is scalable and adaptable, but faces challenges with complexity and data handling in high-load scenarios.
The solution is good and scalable, with no limitations faced in adding new devices or scaling the solution overall.
Senior DevOps & Release Management Engineer at EBC
We were able to deploy it from a small company within Tata with 200 people to what is now a multinational company with 92,000 people globally.
Principal AI and Data Science Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Our company uses it for handling high-volume data ingestion and integration orchestration between our platform and external ad services.
Dev Ops Engineer at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees
The benefits of it being no-code or low-code started to pale in comparison to the cost of making everything slightly more complicated.
Operations Analyst at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Ivanti ITSM is stable and reliable, with few bugs, quick resolutions, and minor performance issues affecting some users.
Sentiment score
7.9
Tray.io is stable and reliable for workflows, despite setup challenges and memory limitations, enhancing data operations and integrations.
Ivanti Automation is very robust and reliable with no latency issues or glitches.
Senior DevOps & Release Management Engineer at EBC
I would rate the stability from one to ten as a nine.
Technical Account Manager at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
In my experience, Tray.io is stable, as we have never experienced issues with it failing or being unavailable.
Principal AI and Data Science Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
The biggest issue we have with Tray.io is that it runs out of memory space and does not process all of our workflows.
Applications Analyst at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Tray.io is highly stable for daily scheduled production runs and event-driven webhooks, provided proper error handling, timeout management, and payload validation are built into the workflow steps.
Dev Ops Engineer at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees
 

Room For Improvement

Ivanti ITSM needs better Linux patching, tool integration, UI modernization, Mac support, API integration, and enhanced training and documentation.
Tray.io poses challenges for non-technical users with complex workflows, high costs, and limited integration and customization options.
There could be an improvement in the ability to easily integrate other systems without extensive development.
Consultant ITSM at Easydesk
The user interface could be more futuristic and modernized in terms of styling and colors.
Senior DevOps & Release Management Engineer at EBC
Regarding analytics and reporting in Ivanti Neurons for ITSM, I am not currently using it because I primarily use the reporting functions from the Endpoint Management tool.
Manager - Technical Support at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
When an automation fails, it usually provides the JSON format, and if Tray.io could include a summary of what the actual error entails, that would be quite beneficial.
IT Engineer at a consumer goods company with 51-200 employees
I believe Tray.io can be improved by offering integration with Tableau, which is still not available.
Principal AI and Data Science Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
There is a steep learning curve in user accessibility; the builder is highly developer-centric, making it difficult for a non-technical team member to modify or troubleshoot workflows.
Automation Engineer at a educational organization with 11-50 employees
 

Setup Cost

Ivanti ITSM offers annual subscription pricing based on users, considered costly by some compared to alternatives like ServiceNow.
I think the pricing aspect is cost-efficient.
Technical Account Manager at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
No one has complained in the finance department, and it is very rare for Tata Motors to refrain from complaining about pricing.
Principal AI and Data Science Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
 

Valuable Features

Ivanti ITSM enhances IT management with automation, flexibility, stability, scalability, integration, and customization, boosting productivity and efficiency.
Tray.io enhances automation with low-code options, robust tools, vast API connections, and insightful logging for improved workflow efficiency.
The interface, workflow, and dashboards are powerful and easy to manage for tracking KPIs and sharing strategies with our customers.
Consultant ITSM at Easydesk
Ivanti Automation significantly simplifies IT infrastructure processes, handling access requests and facilitating various employee requests.
Senior DevOps & Release Management Engineer at EBC
What I appreciate about Ivanti Neurons for ITSM is its comprehensive change request management system.
Manager - Technical Support at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
The connector SDK is also very nice; it has a large library of pre-built connectors that can connect a lot of proprietary internal tools directly into Tray.io, allowing the developer to build, test, and deploy custom connectors using Node.js and integrate the data directly into Tray.io.
Automation Engineer at a educational organization with 11-50 employees
The best features Tray.io offers include the visual workflow builder and HTTP client blocks that enable rapid prototyping and deployment of complex API interactions, including raw HTTP requests, data mappers, and dynamic token generation.
Dev Ops Engineer at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees
The logging and debugging features in Tray.io have helped us considerably, especially when dealing with APIs that return errors sometimes.
Operations Analyst at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

Ivanti ITSM
Ranking in Process Automation
14th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
Help Desk Software (10th), IT Service Management (ITSM) (10th)
Tray.io
Ranking in Process Automation
16th
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
5.4
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Data Integration (17th), Low-Code Development Platforms (19th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (15th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Ivanti ITSM is 1.3%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tray.io is 1.0%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Automation Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Ivanti ITSM1.3%
Tray.io1.0%
Other97.7%
Process Automation
 

Featured Reviews

Rajat_Srivastava - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager - Technical Support at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Has helped streamline ticketing and change management while offering clear documentation support
Documentation and learning materials are available for Ivanti Neurons for ITSM, and if you check the vendor sites, you will find documents for each feature. I believe that short videos should be created and uploaded for newcomers to learn quickly since time can be limited. If a user believes in Ivanti, they should also believe in all its products including Ivanti Neurons for ITSM and Neurons because they are genuinely putting in hard work. This is reflected in the documentation, though I suggest they work on creating more videos. Other than that, you will find everything you need in the community site and documentation site. On a scale of 1-10, I rate Ivanti Neurons for ITSM an 8 out of 10.
Amrit Dash - PeerSpot reviewer
Automation Engineer at a educational organization with 11-50 employees
Automated student enrollments have reduced manual work and now free our team for higher-value support
Tray.io is definitely a highly powerful tool, but there are three main areas that I feel could be improved. There is a steep learning curve in user accessibility; the builder is highly developer-centric, making it difficult for a non-technical team member to modify or troubleshoot workflows. Introducing a more intuitive visual interface similar to what we have in make.com right now would make the platform much more collaborative and easier to work with for any non-technical folks or newly onboarded engineers, allowing them to be briefed faster. Visual debugging is another area where troubleshooting complex nested loops can feel very abstract. Having clearer, more visual step-by-step data tracking during test runs would speed up the development and testing process. The pricing model is geared heavily towards enterprise budgets; offering more flexible mid-market pricing tiers would make it more accessible for a growing organization that wants a small start and scale up gradually. The core platform security is highly robust and easily meets our requirements for SOC 2 and GDPR compliance. However, when utilizing their AI features such as Merlin AI with sensitive student data, we maintain a very cautious approach. While Tray.io provides enterprise-grade governance guardrails and data masking capabilities, our internal compliance policies prevent us from passing any personally identifiable student information directly through AI-driven processors. We trust Tray.io's underlying infrastructure security, but we believe organizations must still enforce strict data filtering protocols on their end to ensure student privacy is maintained. During our evaluation, we tested the AI capabilities in a sandbox environment, primarily using it to generate workflow drafts and natural language prompts from web data schemas. Strength-wise, it is highly capable when it comes to translating simple text descriptions into functional workflow templates. It serves as a great accelerator, helping to map standard files quickly and reducing the initial setup time for basic integrations. For issues, in the case of highly custom APIs or deeply nested data structures, accuracy declines. We noticed occasional misinterpretation of complex schemas, meaning our developers still had to manually review and correct the outputs. It is a highly helpful productivity booster but still requires human oversight for enterprise-grade reliability.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
12%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Construction Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
15%
Construction Company
12%
Outsourcing Company
11%
Healthcare Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise8
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise4
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Ivanti Neurons for ITSM?
Areas that have room for improvement with Ivanti Neurons for ITSM might include some of the reliability with Mac devices. I've noticed sometimes it can be a bit flaky with Mac OS environments.
What is your primary use case for Ivanti Neurons for ITSM?
I use this product for patch management, remote access, and endpoint control.
What needs improvement with Tray.io?
Native rate limit and auto-retry handling can be improved, as when hitting 429 errors or too many requests errors during high-volume API loops, Tray.io lacks native configured backoff and retry log...
What is your primary use case for Tray.io?
Tray.io serves as the core iPaaS orchestration and data ingestion engine between our primary system and numerous external platforms such as ad servers like GAM, FreeWheel, Flitepath, Facebook, ERPs...
What advice do you have for others considering Tray.io?
My advice for others looking into using Tray.io is to modularize earlier. I recommend not building massive monolithic workflows, but rather creating single-purpose callable workflows and triggering...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

HEAT Service Management, Ivanti Automation
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

AFS Group, Auckland Airport, Baylor University, County of Maui, Dis-Chem Pharmacies, Elia, Essentia Health, Government Research Laboratory, Groupe Webhelp, HSBC Africa, Midwestern University
Copper, DigitalOcean, Udemy, AdRoll, FICO, Outreach
Find out what your peers are saying about Ivanti ITSM vs. Tray.io and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.