Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management vs Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management and Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] are both solutions in the Patch Management category. Additionally, 97% of Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] users who would recommend it.

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint ...

Read 45 Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management reviews

9,848 Views
3,151 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Ivanti Security Controls [EOL]

Read 4 Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint ...

Ivanti Security Controls [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 4, 2026

Ivanti Security Controls EOL and Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management are competing in the endpoint security and management space. While Ivanti Security Controls EOL holds some pricing advantages, Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management leads with its robust feature set.

Features: Ivanti Security Controls EOL includes streamlined patch management, agentless deployment, and robust vulnerability assessments. Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management offers AI-powered automation, real-time endpoint visibility, and centralized management for broader endpoint management capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Ivanti Security Controls EOL could enhance its reporting feature, improve the configuration of reports, and expand automation capabilities. Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management can improve app packaging processes, enhance integration with other IT solutions, and streamline its interface for better user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ivanti Security Controls EOL deploys efficiently in existing infrastructures with reliable support. Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management features a cloud-centric deployment model, providing agility and responsive customer service, supporting varied environments and reducing complexity.

Pricing and ROI: Ivanti Security Controls EOL appeals to smaller setups with lower initial costs and satisfactory ROI focused on security. Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management may involve higher setup costs but delivers higher ROI through comprehensive management capabilities, reducing long-term operational costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Patch Management Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Patch Management

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint ...

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Asset Management (4th), Vulnerability Management (20th), Mobile Device Management (MDM) (5th), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (4th), Mobile Threat Defense (4th), Patch Management (4th), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (17th), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (6th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (5th), Autonomous Endpoint Management (1st)

Ivanti Security Controls [EOL]

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

reviewer2882148

Director at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees

Automated onboarding has saved hundreds of hours and now standardizes device security globally

In terms of how Ivanti Neurons for UEM can be improved, I think there's potential for automation of some repetitive tasks. The device provisioning process has already become very close to zero-touch, but the patch deployment is still scheduled and policy-driven. As a result, I believe we can reduce endpoint administration further. I also think the number of integrations and the scalability of the tool can be improved, along with customer service, as we've encountered some issues in certain countries. Regarding the needed improvements, particularly concerning integrations or customer service challenges, we have had problems with integration with some third-party tools requiring additional configuration and testing. Occasionally, we also experienced delays between systems, particularly with user group changes and device compliance updates. The accuracy and reliability of output from Ivanti's AI can be improved. We notice that the AI-driven insights are useful, but there are anomalies and some false positives. Since we are still in a validation period, I cannot provide a definitive mark, but I believe that accuracy should be enhanced, especially for more complex and environment-specific issues where human intervention is still needed.

Read full review

Chethan R

Windows Security Patching Operation III (Cyber Operations) at CBTS

Has reduced hardware strain through agentless patching and improved asset visibility

This solution does not have capability of managing applications. It is only used for asset management and patch management. Regarding analytics for Ivanti Security Controls, it does not have extensive capabilities. It is a basic tool from Ivanti for scanning and deploying. It does not have analytics features such as EDR or security tools available in the market. It only has capability to check missing patches, find them, and deploy them. When it comes to reports, compliance reports or similar types of reports are not user-friendly. Expertise is required for handling these aspects. The asset management in Ivanti Security Controls needs more visibility. Additionally, it can be improved to handle in-house applications, which currently cannot be installed. It can only handle existing applications, unlike Ivanti's Endpoint Manager. It should have additional features in this area that need improvement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"By moving to Intune, they were able to save the complete cost for Ivanti Neurons for UEM and put it towards something they were already paying for, and additionally they improved enrollment deployment time significantly and now can deploy laptops in an hour and even give the task to end users."

"We manage over 1,000 new devices per year, saving more than 1,500 hours of manual IT work annually."

"The technical support from Ivanti is good."

"AI-powered automation and self-healing are additional features that automatically fix common issues and reduce manual work."

"This product helps us to create a streamlined process and it is working as expected."

"Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management has positively impacted our organization by allowing us to reduce the volume of daily tasks."

"The most valuable features of MobileIron UEM are tunneling and enterprise integration."

"The most effective feature of Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management is its reactivity when a patch is released before its due date."

More Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management pros

"Ivanti Security Controls is a better solution than SCCM."

"Ivanti Security Controls is an agentless tool which means we do not need to install any agent on the server or endpoint, and through agentless capabilities, it can install software, install patches, and control over the server, including asset management."

"What has been most valuable is the ability to manage, restore and install upgrades and applications. We scan PCs and server and receive results."

"Technical support is helpful and responsive."

Cons

"We have had problems with integration with some third-party tools requiring additional configuration and testing."

"Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune needs to improve stability. We had issues with patching."

"I also found the UI to be quite complicated to work with, so it takes quite a bit of time to train any new staff and to get them to understand how the solution works."

"The interface is complicated and not very easy to use."

"The product's support and configuration need to improve. It needs to be more scalable."

"I noticed one thing when comparing Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management with other software in the market, such as Cherwell, where we can see the rating of the person. In Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management, I feel the individual ratings and feedback feature is missing."

"The disadvantage in connection with Windows devices is that the pushing of policies takes some time."

"From my perspective of having just moved away from the product, I would probably give it a six."

More Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management cons

"When it comes to reports, compliance reports or similar types of reports are not user-friendly. Expertise is required for handling these aspects."

"Ivanti Security Controls is a powerful product, but it has quite a steep learning curve."

"It should be more scalable."

"For the Windows upgrade, the errors we experience are not clear. We see a time out error but do not know the reason. We would like to know the root cause."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is affordable."

"The license can get expensive if you have a lot of nodes."

"My impression is that MobileIron is very expensive."

"While the price is a bit high, it may be equitable with the features one gets with the product, such as that involving the interface."

"For the one that works with SCCM, it is relatively inexpensive at $8 USD per node, yearly. The standalone product has two versions; the one that patches servers is about $45 USD annually and the version that patches workstations is about half that price at $22 USD."

"The price of MobileIron UEM is very good."

"The solution is expensive compared to other products."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

10%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

15%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	30

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ivanti Neurons for UEM?

My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing is that it is quite high.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ivanti Neurons for UEM?

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management can be improved by allowing me to drive optimization, proactive monitoring, and automatic information, which lets Ivanti detect and resolve endpoint issues fas...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ivanti Neurons for UEM?

My main use case for Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management is support. I use Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management in my daily work to review tickets and look at issues and access requests. I have ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ivanti Security Controls?

Ivanti Security Controls is a powerful product, but it has quite a steep learning curve. There is quite a lot to learn, though it proves to be very powerful if you put in the time to learn how to u...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ivanti Security Controls?

We are using Ivanti Security Controls for deploying Windows updates to Windows servers.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Ivanti Security Controls?

I am currently working with Ivanti Security Controls as a customer. I think Ivanti Security Controls is an effective product for this purpose. I would give tech support for Ivanti Security Controls...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Intune vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 6% of the time

BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 3% of the time

ProcessUnity vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 3% of the time

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 3% of the time

Tenable Security Center vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 3% of the time

More Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management Competitors

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Ivanti Security Controls [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs Ivanti Security Controls [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

PDQ Deploy vs Ivanti Security Controls [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

Qualys TruRisk Eliminate vs Ivanti Security Controls [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

Scappman vs Ivanti Security Controls [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

More Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

September 2026

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management report

Download Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Patch Management

September 2026

Download Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] product report

Also Known As

Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management,Ivanti Neurons for RBVM,Ivanti Neurons for VULN KB,Ivanti Mobile Threat Defense,Ivanti Neurons for Spend Intelligence, Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune, Ivanti Neurons for EASM

No data available

Interactive Demo

Ivanti

Demo not available

Ivanti

Overview

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management leverages AI-powered automation for comprehensive endpoint control. It offers centralized management, real-time visibility, efficient patch deployment, and supports diverse operating systems.

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management integrates AI-driven automation, providing a unified dashboard for streamlined IT operations. Its features include efficient patch management and real-time device monitoring, enhancing IT security and compliance. While comprehensive, improvements in dashboard simplicity, third-party integration, and AI feature clarity are desired. It serves multiple operating systems for seamless operation across various devices, and while effective, enhancements in UI navigation and reporting are suggested. Companies find it vital for centralized device management, compliance enforcement, and automated IT task handling.

What are the most important features?

AI-powered Automation: Reduces manual work through intelligent automation.
Centralized Management: Unified control of devices from a single interface.
Real-time Visibility: Instant access to device status and operations.
Efficient Patch Management: Prioritizes and automates patch deployments.
Neurons Bots: Automates complex IT processes, enhancing efficiency.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Time Savings: Automation reduces manual task duration significantly.
Improved Compliance: Ensures security protocol adherence with ease.
Streamlined Operations: Centralized management simplifies IT workflows.
Enhanced Security: Effective patch management reduces vulnerability risks.
Device Health Monitoring: Supports continuous oversight of device status.

In industries like finance, education, and healthcare, Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management is deployed for managing diverse device environments. It's used for securing sensitive data, ensuring compliance in regulated industries, and optimizing IT service desk operations. Its capabilities aid in provisioning devices and maintaining an up-to-date inventory, crucial for sectors with stringent security requirements.

Ivanti

Ivanti Security Controls delivers a reliable, stable setup for managing and installing upgrades and applications, featuring agentless operation and comprehensive reporting. It's preferred by data centers for efficiently addressing vulnerabilities through agentless solutions and backend scripting.

Ivanti Security Controls is instrumental in deploying updates to servers and workstations, effectively managing Microsoft and non-Microsoft patches. Teams leverage its centralized console for efficiency, conducting vulnerability scans and deploying patches based on detected issues. Users appreciate its responsive support and backend scripting capabilities, finding it essential for streamlining patching tasks and addressing vulnerabilities. Areas for improvement include cloud capabilities, logging, and scalability, with users seeking more intuitive report designs, enhanced documentation, and improved application management. Error messages during Windows upgrades need clarity, and more visibility in asset management is desired.

What are the most important features of Ivanti Security Controls?

Agentless Operation: Minimizes system resource usage, enhancing operational efficiency.
Comprehensive Reporting: Offers in-depth insights into security status and system vulnerabilities.
Patch and Asset Management: Simplifies the management of software updates and inventory tracking.
Credential Management: Ensures secure handling of sensitive access information.
PowerShell Script Execution: Allows automated tasks and customized scripting for tailored solutions.

What benefits should users look for in Ivanti Security Controls?

Operational Efficiency: Streamlines update processes, saving time and resources.
Enhanced Security: Improves system safety by addressing vulnerabilities quickly.
Responsive Support: Assists quickly in troubleshooting and resolving user issues.
Centralized Management: Offers a unified platform for managing updates and patches across systems.
Visibility into Vulnerabilities: Provides insights to tackle potential security threats effectively.

Ivanti Security Controls sees extensive use in industries requiring robust patch management and vulnerability scanning, notably in data centers where maintaining security and efficiency is critical. Its ability to deploy updates seamlessly makes it a valuable tool for sectors focused on IT infrastructure management.

Ivanti

Sample Customers

Frontier Airlines

Information Not Available

Find out what your peers are saying about Qualys, Microsoft, NinjaOne and others in Patch Management. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.