We performed a comparison between Ivanti Automation and ServiceNow Orchestration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Process Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Ivanti Automation is the opportunity to use more or less any kind of scripting software."
"It's easy for the IT admins at the company to use. It isn't hard to understand and there are lots of features you can use out of the box. If a feature isn't available in Ivanti Automation, you can always script it."
"The product has a flexible interface for development."
"The data visualization is good."
"Employee onboarding, de-boarding, and other service-provision features make the process easier and it saves us a lot of time."
"This is a user-friendly solution where scripts can be made with ease. There are also many integration options, including Microsoft products, which gives the product a competitive edge."
"It's scalable."
"The interface of the solution is very user friendly and it is easily accessible via a simple URL. This makes it easier to complete the UI based tasks but using other features require expertise in languages like Java. But along with that, there are limitation in terms of network connectivity testing and administrator faces regular challenges in conducting connectivity tests due to these limitations."
"The solution effectively automates business processes."
"Orchestration is commonly utilized by major corporations. The process of linking methods in ServiceNow, known as the RTS chain to parent methods, is executed seamlessly and efficiently. It's quite impressive and significant in its impact."
"Ivanti Automation should deliver more fixed templates for standard use cases or standard procedures."
"Their cloud relay feature needs to improve to compete with other products in cloud solutions like Azure and AWS. It should be easier to deploy or provision images in the cloud with Ivanti Automation. Better Azure integration would also help."
"The automatic remediation needs enhancement, particularly integrating ServiceNow with tools like SolarWinds and Logic Monitor. It is functional, but it needs improvement."
"There can be gaps in integration."
"Frequent upgrades may negatively impact the performance of instances. Therefore, for now, I don't recommend any additional upgrades."
"I would like a user experience module to be added."
"Efficiency of some features could be improved."
"There is still room for more integrations. Or, it would be nice to bundle multiple products together rather than selling everything as a model as that turns out to be a bit costly."
"We cannot perform GUI automation using the tool."
"The flow rate for releases and updates is very, very slow and does not meet customers' objectives for scalability."
Ivanti Automation is ranked 19th in Process Automation with 2 reviews while ServiceNow Orchestration is ranked 14th in Process Automation with 12 reviews. Ivanti Automation is rated 8.6, while ServiceNow Orchestration is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Ivanti Automation writes "The solution isn't hard to understand, and there are lots of features you can use out of the box". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ServiceNow Orchestration writes "Provides a flexible interface for development, and we do not need a thick client to access the tool". Ivanti Automation is most compared with Liquidware Labs ProfileUnity, Microsoft System Center Orchestrator and VMware User Environment Manager, whereas ServiceNow Orchestration is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Control-M, Nintex Process Platform and BMC TrueSight Orchestration. See our Ivanti Automation vs. ServiceNow Orchestration report.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.