Iron Mountain Connect vs N-able Cove Data Protection comparison

Iron Mountain and N-able are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Iron Mountain is ranked #67, while N-able is ranked #29 with an average rating of 8.3. Iron Mountain holds a 0.3% mindshare in BRS, compared to N-able’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Iron Mountain users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of N-able users who would recommend it.

Iron Mountain Connect

Read 2 Iron Mountain Connect reviews

408 Views
297 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

N-able Cove Data Protection

Read 22 N-able Cove Data Protection reviews

2,473 Views
1,623 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Iron Mountain Connect

N-able Cove Data Protection

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Iron Mountain Connect and N-able Cove Data Protection compete in the data protection market. N-able Cove Data Protection seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features, making it worth the investment.

Features: Iron Mountain Connect stands out for its robust archiving, e-discovery tools, and long-term data retention. N-able Cove Data Protection is praised for flexible recovery options, extensive integrations, and advanced security features.

Room for Improvement: Iron Mountain Connect users note the need for a more intuitive interface, better integration with modern systems, and faster performance. N-able Cove Data Protection could benefit from enhanced reporting features, quicker restoration speeds, and more user-friendly documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Iron Mountain Connect is criticized for a lengthy setup process and needs enhancements in customer service responsiveness. N-able Cove Data Protection is valued for its straightforward setup but is noted for occasional delays in customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Iron Mountain Connect's higher setup costs are balanced with solid ROI in long-term data archiving. N-able Cove Data Protection offers competitive pricing with significant ROI due to its advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed Iron Mountain Connect vs. N-able Cove Data Protection Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Iron Mountain Connect vs. N-able Cove Data Protection

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,349 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Iron Mountain Connect

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

67th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

N-able Cove Data Protection

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

29th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (16th), SaaS Backup (8th), MSP Backup (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Iron Mountain Connect is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of N-able Cove Data Protection is 1.3%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Raj Bhaduri

Enterprise architect at Centrica

Good policies related to data

I primarily use it for various policies related to data, such as data retention, data deletion, and archiving policies. All policies can be set using this system The most valuable feature for me is the policy management capabilities. I would like to see more integration with different platforms,…

Read full review

Jack Henson

Owner at Henson Business Products

Allows us to back up workstations and servers, and saved us time when checking endpoints and the viability of backups

I have some issues with the agent failing on workstations. I've had to completely uninstall several of them, delete everything, and start over to get them to work. That's been the biggest source of my problems recently. The problem is that when we delete one, we lose the backup. Consequently, it means we're without a backup unless we have a local copy. When we delete the agent, there's the problem of how to go back and restore it. I haven't had to deal with it yet, because I haven't had a failure that occurred while I was doing that. I had a workstation that started failing, and we couldn't get the services to run. I don't know what caused it. I had to reinstall the agent, which didn't work. I had to go into the machine and delete everything and load another agent onto it. Once I did that, I was able to make it work, but 90% of the time I never have an issue. During the other 10% of the time when I have a problem, it's a mess. The ability to recover to a different workstation or a different data point is a little bit clumsy. It could use some work.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature for me is the policy management capabilities"

"The most valuable feature by far is the Virtual Disaster Recovery. On top of that is the bare-metal recovery. The recovery options that we have are great. We have tested the Virtual Disaster Recovery and the bare-metal recovery in just about any scenario you can think of. We have even restored bare metal, a full server, to a laptop, and had full functionality. It's just insane how well it works and how simple it is. It does most of the work for you."

"The ease of use and the console are great."

"The most valuables feature is the alerts and monitoring that catches the failed backups."

"It's their cloud, it's their storage. I don't have to buy a space on Amazon or Google's cloud and then use their software to push it. That works well for me. This way, I don't have to worry about another option or the opportunity that there might be a credential leak."

"The most valuable feature is that it's hands-off. I log in every morning and there are pre-canned filters that I've created to make my life easier. I have something called server status color bars, and that gives me all the servers and, in a nutshell, I can see: if any errors are being reported; when the last backup was; if one is not working, should there be one, and it literally jumps off the page."

"The user interface is the most valuable. It gives us the ability to check everything. With more than 100 endpoints running that software, I like the ability to quickly check that everything is working correctly. That's one of the biggest selling points."

"The ability to back up, restore, and do different types of testing for the preventative maintenance has really increased our importance to these clients because they see the value in how fast we can get them back up and running. We're saving them money in that way."

"N-able Cove Data Protection is user-friendly and straightforward, and the dashboard is clear."

More N-able Cove Data Protection pros

Cons

"I would like to see more integration with different platforms."

"N-able Cove Data Protection does not provide a lot of SaaS backup products, which is an area they can improve. Additionally, there are some limitations on the storage side, where I cannot have a lot of employees backing up their data."

"Integration with a hybrid cloud is something that I found complicated."

"There could be a possibility to create a local NAS backup for infrastructure."

"An area for improvement that would really work out well would be if there were a little bit more of an elegant handshake relationship between SolarWinds RMM and the PCs that are being backed up, to advise regarding "up" status... Since RMM is an agent that feeds back that a machine is alive and on, I don't see any reason why they can't either tap into that one feature or build the same exact polling within the backup agent, to update right away and say the system is online or offline."

"I have some issues with the agent failing on workstations. I've had to completely uninstall several of them, delete everything, and start over to get them to work."

"A better default view on my dashboard would be great. There is a lot of useless information there that it pulls up. They could present the dashboard slightly better, in terms of the extra information after the first five columns. The first five columns are awesome. After that, I don't care about the rest, and there are another seven things after that."

"N-able Cove Data Protection for Microsoft 365 is an area with shortcomings that need improvement."

"For the MSP side, they could have more of a "security user" that can go in and only see certain clients. If you give somebody access as a technician, they can see all the clients."

More N-able Cove Data Protection cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The pricing, for now, is good. The package that they gave us recently is pretty good. It depends on how many clients you have, and you pay for certain terabytes per license. These terabytes, if not used, are pooled together."

"The pricing is very competitive and it's well worth the price."

"When you have a device/appliance on the site quite a lot of the other enterprise class backup people insist that you have their appliance, which is frankly offensively expensive. Because when you pry the top off, it's just a standard 19-inch tin box with a standard Intel I5 in it, some RAM, and a hard drive. Then, you go, "Why have they just charged me 5,500 quid for a box, which I could have probably build for under 500." Whereas, with the SolarWinds product, they don't have that. The backup appliances that we have onsite are just plain cooking PCs. We can build our own machines, which is reflected in the price that we can offer a customer."

"I believe that the price is very reasonable in comparison to other options. It is cheaper than both Redstor and Acronis and, since we are now using our own on-premise cloud, there is absolutely no comparison since we have unlimited storage rather than paying per gigabyte used for their onsite storage. We are currently able to backup fifty computers for the same price that we use to backup five computers."

"There is no per node cost, at least not the way I am doing it. I am on bulk. New customers can be set up on a trial, where they can get things all squared away, then they can switch over to being a billed customer."

"The pricing is affordable. N-able Cove Data Protection has a direct-to-cloud architecture, but it also allows saving backups locally without extra storage costs."

"The pricing of SolarWinds seems to be fair compared to the rest of the industry."

"The cost is around ten dollars per workstation a month and that includes a certain amount of data."

More N-able Cove Data Protection pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

21%

Manufacturing Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about N-able Backup?

The initial setup of N-able Cove Data Protection was very easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for N-able Backup?

In terms of pricing, N-able Cove Data Protection is neither cheap nor expensive compared to other competitors.

See all answers

What needs improvement with N-able Backup?

N-able Cove Data Protection does not provide a lot of SaaS backup products, which is an area they can improve. Additionally, there are some limitations on the storage side, where I cannot have a lo...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Spectrum Protect vs Iron Mountain Connect

Compared 39% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Iron Mountain Connect

Compared 32% of the time

Rubrik vs Iron Mountain Connect

Compared 29% of the time

More Iron Mountain Connect Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs N-able Cove Data Protection

Compared 15% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect vs N-able Cove Data Protection

Compared 11% of the time

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs N-able Cove Data Protection

Compared 6% of the time

Rubrik vs N-able Cove Data Protection

Compared 5% of the time

Azure Backup vs N-able Cove Data Protection

Compared 5% of the time

More N-able Cove Data Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

April 2025

Download Iron Mountain Connect product report

Buyer's Guide

N-able Cove Data Protection

April 2025

Download N-able Cove Data Protection product report

Also Known As

No data available

N-able Backup, SolarWinds Backup, SolarWinds MSP Backup & Recovery, SolarWinds MSP Backup

Overview

Connected Accounting&ERP is a mid-range accounting program with single user and network editions for Macintosh and Windows operating systems. Connected can be shared concurrently by both Mac OS and Windows users on a single data file. Connected "Core Accounting" consists of the General Ledger, Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable modules. Connected "Enterprise" builds on the Core Accounting aspects by adding powerful inventory, job costing, and currency additions. Pricing starts at $399.00.

Iron Mountain

Cove Data Protection, from N-able, is a comprehensive solution designed to safeguard critical business data. It offers a range of features including backup and recovery, disaster recovery, and endpoint protection. With automated backups and flexible scheduling options, it ensures data is protected and easily recoverable.

The solution also includes advanced security measures such as encryption and ransomware detection to prevent unauthorized access and data breaches. Cove Data Protection provides seamless integration with various platforms and offers centralized management for efficient monitoring and control.

With its user-friendly interface and robust capabilities, Cove Data Protection is an ideal choice for businesses seeking reliable data protection.

N-able

Sample Customers

University of La Verne

Computer Depot, Leading Edge Computers, IT Logic Australia

Buyer's Guide

Iron Mountain Connect vs. N-able Cove Data Protection

April 2025

Free Report: Iron Mountain Connect vs. N-able Cove Data Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about Iron Mountain Connect vs. N-able Cove Data Protection and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Iron Mountain Connect vs. N-able Cove Data Protection report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.