

Acunetix and Snyk are both prominent tools in vulnerability detection. Acunetix has the upper hand in comprehensive scans and lower false-positive rates, while Snyk is ahead in integration and ease of use for developers.
Features: Acunetix is preferred for its comprehensive scan capabilities, quick testing for various vulnerabilities, and flexibility in cloud or on-premises deployment. It integrates smoothly with CI/CD tools and maintains a low false-positive rate. Snyk offers seamless vulnerability scans for code, containers, and infrastructure with developer-centric integrations. It provides a robust vulnerability database and actionable insights with automatic fixes.
Room for Improvement: Acunetix could enhance report customization and integration with GitHub and Azure DevOps. It also faces criticism for limited mobile application support and high costs. Snyk can improve by adding interactive scanning features and refining its vulnerability notifications. Enhancements in support for multiple languages would also be beneficial.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix supports on-premises, hybrid, and cloud deployments but has mixed reviews on response times in technical support. Snyk emphasizes cloud-based deployments and efficient support, though its documentation could be clearer. Acunetix offers enterprise-grade support while Snyk focuses on swift, developer-centric guidance.
Pricing and ROI: Acunetix is often criticized for its high pricing and inflexible domain-based licensing, despite delivering robust security improvements and ROI. Snyk is praised for being competitively priced with flexible licensing aligned with developer needs. It provides good value for money and a transparent licensing approach.
It saves a significant amount of time by covering attack surfaces.
I have seen a return on investment, as Acunetix helps reduce the man-days and effort needed for scanning bulk applications through automated assessments.
On average, we reduced the mean time to fix security issues by roughly 40 to 50% for the classes of vulnerabilities Snyk surfaced, which shortened our exposure window and reduced rework during upgrades.
I can see that Snyk saves the costs of hiring security developers for vulnerability scanning and security checks, as that responsibility is now managed by Snyk.
For high-severity issues, they reach out within two to three hours, and for critical issues, a response is received within 15 minutes.
The technical support from Invicti is very good and fast.
Support staff not being familiar with the problem.
Our long-standing association has ensured smooth communication, resulting in favorable support experiences and satisfactory issue resolution.
Their response time aligns with their SLA commitments.
We could understand the implementation of the product and other features without the need for human interaction.
Acunetix can handle increasing workloads and more applications easily.
Snyk allows for scaling across large organizations, accommodating tens of thousands of applications and over 60,000 repositories.
Snyk is very scalable and can handle my organization's growth and changing needs.
As the number of applications and upgrades grows, it continues to fit into our workflow without adding much overhead.
Snyk has been stable in our environment, and I have used it consistently during upgrades and security remediation work.
The main concern is related to false positives; Acunetix needs to work on identifying valid and invalid findings.
I could supply it with maybe a Swagger file or a JSON file, and Acunetix would pick it up, scan all the endpoints according to the OWASP Top Ten, and give me remediation and actionable remediation reports.
Acunetix should have better integration with newer tools such as GitHub and Azure DevOps.
It lacks the ability to select branches on its Web UI, forcing users to rely on CLI or CI/CD for that functionality.
The inclusion of AI to remove false positives would be beneficial.
As we are moving toward GenAI, we expect Snyk to leverage AI features to improve code scanning findings.
The pricing cost is affordable for small and mid-sized organizations, and when compared to Checkmarx, it is significantly affordable, as Checkmarx is quite expensive.
We secured a special licensing model for penetration testing companies, which is cost-effective.
The pricing of Acunetix is pretty expensive and could be improved.
Snyk is recognized as the cheapest option we have evaluated.
After negotiations, we received a special package with a good price point.
Snyk is less expensive.
Its most valuable role is in enhancing security by identifying potential vulnerabilities efficiently.
The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities.
The best feature Acunetix offers is the centralized dashboard and the quality of reports it generates, which includes various options for selecting reports and developer options for directly sharing the reports with developers.
Our integration of Snyk into GitHub allows us to automatically scan codebases and identify issues, which has improved efficiency.
Snyk helps detect vulnerabilities before code moves to production, allowing for integration with DevOps and providing a shift-left advantage by identifying and fixing bugs before deployment.
Snyk has positively impacted my organization by improving the security posture across all software repositories, resulting in fewer critical vulnerabilities, more confidence in overall product security, and faster security compliance for project clients.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Snyk | 4.9% |
| Acunetix | 2.4% |
| Other | 92.7% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 18 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 19 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 24 |
Acunetix is a robust web application security testing tool offering rapid scanning, user-friendly interfaces, and accurate vulnerability detection with minimal false positives. It supports both cloud and on-premises deployment, making it versatile for various security needs.
Acunetix is distinguished by its capability to identify critical vulnerabilities such as cross-site scripting and SQL injection with high precision. It integrates seamlessly with CI/CD tools, supporting continuous scanning and large-scale application management. The centralized dashboard and detailed automated reporting streamline operations. Despite its benefits, users suggest improvements like reducing false positives, flexible pricing, and enhanced API scanning. Better integration with platforms like GitHub and Azure DevOps is sought, alongside more comprehensive customization and faster scanning. Mobile application scanning and improved team collaboration tools are also desired.
What features make Acunetix stand out?Acunetix is widely implemented across industries undertaking web application security assessments, including those requiring penetration testing and vulnerability assessment. It ensures applications meet security protocols and complies with standards while fitting into CI/CD workflows for secure pre-release checks.
Snyk excels in integrating security within the development lifecycle, providing teams with an AI Trust Platform that combines speed with security efficiency, ensuring robust AI application development.
Snyk empowers developers with AI-ready engines offering broad coverage, accuracy, and speed essential for modern development. With AI-powered visibility and security, Snyk allows proactive threat prevention and swift threat remediation. The platform supports shifts toward LLM engineering and AI code analysis, enhancing security and development productivity. Snyk collaborates with GenAI coding assistants for improved productivity and AI application threat management. Platform extensibility supports evolving standards with API access and native integrations, ensuring comprehensive and seamless security embedding in development tools.
What are Snyk's standout features?
What benefits can users expect?
Industries leverage Snyk for security in CI/CD pipelines by automating checks for dependency vulnerabilities and managing open-source licenses. Its Docker and Kubernetes scanning capabilities enhance container security, supporting a proactive security approach. Integrations with platforms like GitHub and Azure DevOps optimize implementation across diverse software environments.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.