Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center vs Visual Paradigm comparison

Interfacing Technologies En...

Read 27 Visual Paradigm reviews

4,112 Views
2,937 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center and Visual Paradigm compete in the business process management software space. Visual Paradigm stands out for its robust features, appealing to those seeking advanced capabilities.

Features: Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center focuses on process management, compliance, and risk management. Visual Paradigm is known for modeling and diagramming tools that support diverse software development needs, emphasizing diagramming and design versatility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center provides a straightforward deployment model with tailored customer support, making integration easier. Visual Paradigm offers versatile deployment options and efficient support channels but requires more initial configuration effort.

Pricing and ROI: Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center is noted for its affordable setup cost, enabling faster ROI. Visual Paradigm, while having a higher setup cost, offers significant ROI through its comprehensive feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center vs. Visual Paradigm Report (Updated: April 2025).

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center vs. Visual Paradigm

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Interfacing Technologies En...

Ranking in Business Process Design

22nd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Visual Paradigm

Ranking in Business Process Design

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Business Process Design category, the mindshare of Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Visual Paradigm is 6.3%, down from 6.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Design

Featured Reviews

SantoshKulkarni1

Consultant at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

A Robust Solution with Enhanced Automation and Process Improvement Identification Capabilities

I recommend that users invest more time in the initial setup of the process architecture within the tool. It is crucial to spend time designing how the process architecture works as it significantly impacts how the tool behaves. This upfront investment can prevent the need for extensive reworking later on.

Read full review

Angie Ibrahim Eissa

Founder & Managing Partner at BBL

A software application designed for software development teams to model business information systems and manage development processes

Setting up Visual Paradigm is easy. There's hardly any configuration needed, unlike some other tools. You just choose your method and diagram type, and you're good to go. As for improvements, integrating project management features with diagrams could be better. Viewing outputs could also be smoother, especially when working with multiple files.Deployment is quick and painless. It practically takes no time at all to set up. And because I also teach at the university, I use Visual Paradigm for my classes and case studies. It's easy to switch between products, and my students have no trouble using it on their own.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One notable software-related benefit from a user perspective is our improved ability to identify opportunities for automation and process enhancement just by gaining a clearer view of the processes. There are two valuable aspects. First, setting up the process architecture is commendable. Second, not having to maintain different versions of processes is a notable benefit. The solution is stable. The support team is responsive."

"The most valuable feature is the integrated manner in which all the capabilities of the Enterprise Process Center platform work together and make it easier to complete the documentation of processes."

"I like the structure. I can see the diagrams and everything I created."

"The pricing model is attractive."

"It is easy-to-use and it helps understand its data modeling structure through the intuitive user interface."

"What I found most valuable in Visual Paradigm is diagramming. I had a great user experience as diagramming in the tool is easy and convenient, even for complex diagrams or models. Visual Paradigm is the perfect tool for me, and I prefer it over Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect. Visual Paradigm is better for collaboration if you consider, for example, versioning, so this is another valuable tool feature that's simple and embedded in the solution. In Visual Paradigm, it's also easy to set up the project with team members and collaborate, and it's also a pro of the tool."

"Visual Paradigm allowed me to create UML diagrams efficiently."

"The solution is very user-friendly. It's easy to just open it and start working."

"The application is easy to use and provides informative diagrams."

"It is easy and intuitive to use, not excessively rigid, and quite flexible."

More Visual Paradigm pros

Cons

"However, on the process mining side, there's potential for improvement to gain deeper insights into process functionality. Additionally, there's always room for enhancement in the user interface."

"As with all such platforms, Enterprise Process Center is a complex tool and there are many capabilities and features that take time to learn."

"From time to time, we experience some troubles when we work as teams."

"There are some connectivity issues that crop up rarely when used with SQL Server."

"Visual Paradigm can improve by having better process mining tools and model integration."

"For me, what needs improvement in Visual Paradigm is the limited features included in the $99 license, which is the cheapest option. If more features could be included in the cheapest licensing package, Visual Paradigm would be better, especially for businesses that have a limited budget for buying software."

"Visual Paradigm's initial deployment was difficult since we did it for the first time. It is challenging to learn to use the product."

"It's still early for me to comment since I've only been using it for two months, but the responsiveness when diagramming needs to be improved."

"There is room for improvement in the licensing model. I would suggest implementing country-specific pricing, as many other products in India do. This would make Visual Paradigm more affordable and accessible."

"There is a certain inherent complexity when creating UML diagrams."

More Visual Paradigm cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My advice for anybody who is implementing this product is to understand what options you believe you are going to want to implement and rollout in the first three to five years, but spend the most time understanding what the set-up costs and pricing will be in the first two or maybe three."

"You can use Paradigm on a subscription basis and you can choose from different tiers of subscription."

"Compared to other solutions such as IBM Rational which is expensive, This solution is priced low."

"Pricing for Visual Paradigm is a four out of five for me. I'm happy with its pricing."

"You can move between the tiers from month to month so you are not restricted to one pricing model."

"Visual Paradigm costs $99 per license. I chose the cheapest option from the pricing list."

"Visual Paradigm's pricing is not expensive."

"Over the years I've seen an increase in price, and it makes it difficult for a single person company, like me, to decide whether to extend the license."

"This is an open-sourced solution, it is free to use."

More Visual Paradigm pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

11%

Educational Organization

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center?

One notable software-related benefit from a user perspective is our improved ability to identify opportunities for automation and process enhancement just by gaining a clearer view of the processe...

What needs improvement with Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center?

While we have yet to explore the tool's capabilities fully, I can't think of any immediate drawbacks. However, on the process mining side, there's potential for improvement to gain deeper insights ...

What is your primary use case for Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center?

We use the solution for finance processes, specifically for accounts payable and accounts receivable.

What do you like most about Visual Paradigm?

The solution is the best application for data modeling. It helps to architect business processes. Its best features are pricing and functionality.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Visual Paradigm?

I purchased Visual Paradigm on my own, and it was competitively priced, so I was fine with the pricing.

What needs improvement with Visual Paradigm?

The product can always get better as the industry changes, however, I didn't necessarily feel it was lacking for what I did with it.

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs Visual Paradigm

Comparisons

No data available

Compared 36% of the time

Visio vs Visual Paradigm

Compared 19% of the time

Lucidchart vs Visual Paradigm

Compared 17% of the time

Bizagi vs Visual Paradigm

Compared 8% of the time

Camunda vs Visual Paradigm

Compared 5% of the time

More Visual Paradigm Competitors

Product Reports

Business Process Design

Download Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center product report

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center report

Download Visual Paradigm product report

Also Known As

Enterprise Process Center

No data available

Overview

The Enterprise Process Center, A BPM software, helps companies gain a 360 degree blueprint of the organization in support of complex improvement, compliance and transformation initiatives. The EPC goes beyond process mapping & analysis, it covers the full spectrum of lifecycle governance and collaboration, enterprise architecture (EA), strategy-to-execution and workflow automation needs. The EPC offers a single repository to manage all complex business entity relationships and interdependencies, including: processes, procedures, roles, org units, resources, risks, controls, policies, rules, documents, strategic objectives, key performance indicators, systems, meta data & services. The EPC facilitates the alignment and visualization of strategic and operational performance and is often leveraged for quality, improvement, risk & audit management initiatives such as ISO, Lean, Basel III, SOX, and ITIL, amongst others.

Interfacing Technologies

Visual Paradigm is a UML tool. The tool is designed for a wide range of users including software engineers, system analysts, business analysts and system architects, or for anyone who is interested in reliably building large-scale software systems using an object-oriented approach. In addition, Visual Paradigm supports the latest standards of UML notation.

Sample Customers

Pepsi-Cola Manufacturing International Ltd., EFFORTS, Stuart Wright

Adobe, Apple, at&t, Caterpillar, Intel, NASA, Nokia, Toyota

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center vs. Visual Paradigm