Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Intercede MyID PSM (Password Security Management) vs Microsoft Entra ID Protection comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Intercede MyID PSM (Passwor...
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Password Managers (38th)
Microsoft Entra ID Protection
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
Identity Management (IM) (7th), Microsoft Security Suite (8th), Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. Intercede MyID PSM (Password Security Management) is designed for Enterprise Password Managers and holds a mindshare of 0.3%, up 0.0% compared to last year.
Microsoft Entra ID Protection, on the other hand, focuses on Identity Management (IM), holds 2.0% mindshare, up 0.9% since last year.
Enterprise Password Managers Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Intercede MyID PSM (Password Security Management)0.3%
Azure Key Vault17.8%
AWS Secrets Manager16.5%
Other65.4%
Enterprise Password Managers
Identity Management (IM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Microsoft Entra ID Protection2.0%
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud12.2%
Microsoft Entra ID8.8%
Other77.0%
Identity Management (IM)
 

Featured Reviews

Robin Schechinger - PeerSpot reviewer
Product Owner at Telekom Deutschland GmbH
A tool to encrypt and decrypt emails that can also be useful for general access management
I rate the initial setup process of Intercede MyID an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy. The solution was deployed throughout the whole organization, meaning the solution was rolled out in my company, and that's it. The solution was deployed in a couple of days. Two people were required for the solution's deployment and maintenance phases.
Luis Gabriel Mieles Benavides - PeerSpot reviewer
Cloud Architect at Sonda S.A.
Identity protection has strengthened daily access control and improved passwordless security
The best features of Microsoft Entra ID Protection include the password dictionary, which we do not have in Active Directory. Conditional access is excellent because we can select the location from which users authenticate, and this is the best feature for me. Another valuable feature is the ability to identify critical or suspicious computers. If computers are too old or too suspicious, the system does not allow authentication, which is excellent. The effectiveness of automated remediation for handling identity threats is great. I use passwordless authentication with cellular phone authentication, which is excellent because we do not always need a password. Microsoft Entra ID Protection is a great solution overall because it improves security in the company through identity management. It improves integration with other solutions such as Google, Gmail, Hotmail, Outlook, and Facebook. We can create different applications and integrate with different services.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The feature for signing documents is important to me."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the access management."
"The solution's technical support offers great assistance to users."
"The reverse proxy feature provides additional security that is not available in other solutions such as SailPoint and Dell."
"The valuable features include multifactor authentication, accessory capabilities, and conditional access for specific applications."
"The deployment process is straightforward. It takes a few hours to complete."
"I find the most valuable feature to be conditional access."
"As an end-user, I find the experience to be quite seamless. My main advantage is that I only need to manage one login and one two-factor authentication method to access all the necessary tools. I don't have to set up separate logins and authentication for each application."
"I use conditional access most of the time."
"For me, automatization is most valuable."
 

Cons

"Reporting features would be a good addition to Intercede MyID, as it is one of the areas where the solution lacks."
"I'm not sure whether the solution has a mobile version or mobile dashboard, but that would be nice."
"The solution is not optimized to work with Mac devices on a granular level. They work seamlessly with Windows but have a lot to improve to work with Mac devices. It also needs to improve stability and scalability."
"The experience is not very smooth for the user. This is an area where Microsoft could improve the authorization process."
"Support or customer service with Microsoft Entra ID Protection can be challenging because you can get lost in the queue. You can open up a case, but sometimes it can be an hour or even a day between communications."
"Identity protection and trust issues, particularly in hybrid environments, could be addressed better with Microsoft Entra ID Protection. This would aid connectivity concerns."
"There is room for improvement in the ability for Entra ID Protection to inherit roles and configurations from whatever solution I am migrating from, so that these don't have to be built from the ground up during the implementation process."
"A potential area of improvement in Microsoft Entra ID Protection could include backup-level capability or snapshot capability."
"Identity labeling and sensitivity needs improvement to be comparable to Dell."
"The pricing could be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product's pricing a seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."
"From one to ten, if one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the tool a seven out of ten."
"The price of Azure AD is not expensive."
"The pricing is competitive in the SMA segment and runs $5-$6 per user."
"The product cost is on the expensive side."
"Azure Active Directory Identity Protection is not very expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Password Managers solutions are best for your needs.
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business15
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise5
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Active Directory Identity Protection?
The pricing for Microsoft Entra ID protection is not expensive. It varies based on the company's size and quality.
What needs improvement with Azure Active Directory Identity Protection?
I do not think there are any areas that could be improved with Microsoft Entra ID Protection at this time.
What is your primary use case for Azure Active Directory Identity Protection?
I use Microsoft Entra ID Protection and provide support for features such as multifactor authentication and conditional access. I work with this solution every day.
 

Also Known As

MyID
Azure Active Directory Identity Protection, Azure AD Identity Protection
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Wells Fargo, Boeing, Airbus, United Health Group, U.S. Social Security Administration, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Kuwait Government
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Intercede MyID PSM (Password Security Management) vs. Microsoft Entra ID Protection and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.