Instana Infrastructure Monitoring vs ScienceLogic comparison

Instana Infrastructure Moni...

Read 45 ScienceLogic reviews

2,268 Views
1,658 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

ScienceLogic and Instana Infrastructure Monitoring are competitive products within the infrastructure monitoring domain. ScienceLogic offers more favorable pricing and support attributes, whereas Instana provides superior feature sets and performance.

Features: ScienceLogic provides broad coverage through integrations and automated workflows, comprehensive IT infrastructure management, and efficient resource allocation. Instana features real-time visibility, AI-driven insights, and faster problem diagnosis and resolution.

Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic could enhance its real-time monitoring capabilities, improve AI-driven analytical features, and expand its integration options. Instana may benefit from refining its pricing model, optimizing deployment resource requirements, and enhancing basic support services.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic offers flexible, scalable architecture and robust customer support, while Instana provides an easy-to-configure deployment process supported by dedicated service teams for quick operational setup.

Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic generally presents a more cost-effective entry point with solid ROI through operational enhancements. Instana, despite higher setup costs, delivers substantial ROI by leveraging advanced features and quick issue resolution, which many find justify the investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Instana Infrastructure Monitoring vs. ScienceLogic Report (Updated: April 2025).

Instana Infrastructure Monitoring vs. ScienceLogic

Download the complete report

Helped 850,236 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Instana Infrastructure Moni...

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

32nd

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

24th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ScienceLogic

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

22nd

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

18th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (7th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Network Monitoring Software (25th), Server Monitoring (12th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), AIOps (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Instana Infrastructure Monitoring is 0.5%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ScienceLogic is 1.8%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Hakimuddin Ronaque

Assistant Manager at Lauren Information Technologies Pvt Ltd

Has the capability to automatically integrate with a large number of products

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten. I have not worked much on other technologies, like SAP or VMware's virtualization part, on-prem infrastructure, or cloud infrastructure. Instana Infrastructure Monitoring is so fast and easy to adapt that it works fine. I have not explored other operating systems or infrastructure solutions because my company doesn't have that customer scale. Most of our customers are on-prem or on AWS or Azure, but Instana Infrastructure Monitoring adapts to their infrastructure very well. My company came to know how well Instana Infrastructure Monitoring adapts to our customers' infrastructures when we take care of the PoC phase. Around 12 to 15 people in my company use the product.

Read full review

Michael Wenn

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

Offers comprehensive monitoring and tool consolidation but integration complexity needs improvement

There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks. Although these prebuilt features are great, there is considerable complexity in bringing them together to create a unified dashboard. Even with many good integrations and deep visibility, the implementation takes time, especially when it doesn't involve these integrations. While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise. It's challenging for new customers to implement independently. The implementation speed of non-PowerPack or non-out-of-the-box integrations should be improved. Additionally, the AI automation feature is not yet very rich due to resource constraints supporting a wide platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product's initial setup is easy."

"The product is easy to deploy."

"The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support."

"Provides agentless monitoring so there's no need to install the agent on each server."

"Power packs."

"The solution excels in three areas: application monitoring, server monitoring, and network performance monitoring."

"The solution provides good infra-monitoring features."

"Best feature of all is detailed monitoring of services, processes, ports and SSL certificates and or web content."

"When it comes to features, the power pack is the most valuable."

"The most valuable features of ScienceLogic are AI and machine learning."

More ScienceLogic pros

Cons

"The product’s scalability is an area with certain limitations, making it an area where improvements are required."

"Instana Infrastructure Monitoring needs to support monitoring of the .NET framework since it is one of the areas where the solution currently has shortcomings."

"We want to understand: how does the back end work? What if some problem occurs? What we can do? They need to provide more information."

"The product must educate its strategic partners for deployment."

"Admins do not have direct access to the reporting."

"The product's reporting functionalities have certain shortcomings, making it an area where improvements are required."

"They should add CLI command modes and scripts for high performance."

"ScienceLogic is working towards a kind of AI, DKAIRA enablement, but I find one dependency is the frequent need to rely on professional services."

"One important area we feel could be improved is the UI. It takes a lot of clicks to do very simple tasks."

"ScienceLogic does not have application monitoring. We definitely need something integrated within ScienceLogic to monitor applications so that we don't have to rely on monitoring tools to monitor other applications. At least the ones that are market leaders, such as SAP, Oracle, and others."

More ScienceLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of the tool is around 130 USD per month."

"My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price."

"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."

"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."

"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution."

"Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow."

"I'm not the best person to discuss pricing, but what I do know is that it's a use-and-go structure. You use this much storage and pay this much for it. That's how it is. Every time, we continue to add a large amount of data to the environment."

"Pricing between the two is quiet large therefore you can save some money if you don't require to collect all info on each device."

"The pricing model for ScienceLogic could improve."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Instana Infrastructure Monitoring?

The product is easy to deploy.

What needs improvement with Instana Infrastructure Monitoring?

The product’s scalability is an area with certain limitations, making it an area where improvements are required.

What is your primary use case for Instana Infrastructure Monitoring?

I use the solution in my company, especially if an application is down and it is considered to be a P1 issue or a critical issue. The network team will blame the application team, while the applica...

What do you like most about ScienceLogic?

The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is working towards a kind of AI, DKAIRA enablement, but I find one dependency is the frequent need to rely on professional services. If the knowledge for implementation could be spread...

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs Instana Infrastructure Monitoring

Comparisons

Compared 44% of the time

Zabbix vs Instana Infrastructure Monitoring

Compared 21% of the time

Amazon CloudWatch vs Instana Infrastructure Monitoring

Compared 18% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs Instana Infrastructure Monitoring

Compared 17% of the time

More Instana Infrastructure Monitoring Competitors

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 13% of the time

Zabbix vs ScienceLogic

Compared 13% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs ScienceLogic

Compared 10% of the time

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 9% of the time

LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 8% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

Product Reports

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Download Instana Infrastructure Monitoring product report

Instana Infrastructure Monitoring report

Download ScienceLogic product report

Overview

Instana ensures that your application delivery organization has the data, visibility and information they need to manage the performance of critical business applications across the DevOps lifecycle. Built to handle the dynamic nature of containerized, microservice architectures, Instana automates infrastructure and application monitoring helping you to ensure the performance and quality of custom applications and accelerate your CI/CD cycle.

Instana

ScienceLogic is a comprehensive IT infrastructure monitoring solution that supports networks, servers, cloud environments, and applications, suitable for private cloud and on-premises deployments.

Organizations leverage ScienceLogic for its robust capabilities in monitoring IT infrastructures of all sizes. It offers granular discovery, integration with CMDB, and ticketing systems. Valued for its flexibility, incident automation, remediation, and real-time relationship mapping, it supports hybrid environments with scalable and efficient monitoring functionalities. AI and machine learning enhance its feature set, while ease of deployment and strong support are crucial benefits.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Agentless Configuration: Ensures easy deployment without the need for agents.
Third-Party Integration: Seamlessly integrates with various tools.
Dynamic Component Mapping: Offers real-time relationship and dependency mapping.
Flexible Graphs: Allows custom visual representation of data.
Role-Based Access: Provides tiered access for different user roles.
Infrastructure and Event Management: Efficiently monitors hybrid environments.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Scalability: Handles environments of all sizes efficiently.
AI and Machine Learning: Enhances automation and incident management.
Ease of Deployment: Streamlines initial setup and reduces time to value.
Customization: Custom dashboards and reports cater to specific needs.
Comprehensive Support: Access to excellent support services.

ScienceLogic is implemented across multiple industries, including large enterprises, for its capability to handle complex IT ecosystems. Its integration with CMDB and ticketing systems ensures it fits within existing workflows. Organizations use it to monitor diverse infrastructure landscapes, ensuring seamless performance and quick incident resolution.

Sample Customers

booxware, drivenow, scopevisio, enevo, TimoCom, mobitech

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell

Instana Infrastructure Monitoring vs. ScienceLogic