Infobright DB vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service comparison

Ignite Technologies and Oracle are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Ignite Technologies is ranked #37, while Oracle is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.5. Ignite Technologies holds a 0.2% mindshare in SQL, compared to Oracle’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Ignite Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Infobright DB

Read 10 Infobright DB reviews

172 Views
110 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Read 20 Oracle MySQL Cloud Service reviews

223 Views
158 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Infobright DB

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

Infobright DB and Oracle MySQL Cloud Service are key players in the database market. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service often leads with advanced features and strong Oracle ecosystem integration, providing a justifiable higher price point.

Features: Infobright DB offers valuable features like a columnar storage engine, efficient data compression, and optimized query execution for analytical processing. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service supports high availability, robust security, and integration within the Oracle infrastructure, including JSON and geographical data handling, catering to expansive applications.

Room for Improvement: Infobright DB could enhance integration with third-party tools, expand real-time data processing capabilities, and improve scalability for larger datasets. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service could simplify deployment, refine support documentation, and reduce dependency on the Oracle ecosystem for wider accessibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Infobright DB stands out for its simple deployment and straightforward customer service, ideal for smaller setups. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service offers comprehensive cloud-based solutions with excelled customer support, ensuring scalability for expanding enterprises.

Pricing and ROI: Infobright DB presents lower initial costs with quick ROI for analytical projects due to its specialized processing capabilities. In contrast, Oracle MySQL Cloud Service, with a higher cost, provides long-term value through extensive features and robust scalability, appealing to enterprises demanding comprehensive database solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Infobright DB vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Infobright DB vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Infobright DB

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

37th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Warehouse (27th)

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

10th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of Infobright DB is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Steve Dodge

Senior System Architect - Resiliency Engineering at AT&T

If you need a real big data solution, look for a distributed solution that actually has a proven track record.

This version of Infobright has zero support for distributed scalability. The internal smart grid employed for each table has a major flaw in that the data size cannot be expunged until 2GB of data is reached at the column-level. This is a major flaw, making usage in a big-data scenario impossible. This means that you can delete as many records from a database table as you want. However, unless the 2GB aggregate size threshold was reached for some of the columns in the table, no reduction in disk space usage will occur. Only the data from the columns that reached 2GB will actually decrease. Other columns below 2GB in size do not leave the disk. I spent countless hours trying to find some workaround for this. I have nightmares of my e-mail inbox full of unsolvable questions about data size reduction from our field engineers.

Read full review

Raghuram K M

Chief Technology Officer at Prognosys Medical Systems

Ideal, stable, good support and it helps with the developer console

I have used MongoDB, MySQL, and Oracle. MongoDB is entirely different. It's a NoSQL platform database, so it's totally different. It is a little bit hard to work with. The way it is organized and structured is different. But between Microsoft Azure MySQL and Oracle, they are pretty similar. * Cost: Microsoft is not a preferred platform. Their licensing is very complex and expensive. Oracle is much better. * AI: In terms of data analytics and AI, Microsoft is better. Certain complex transformations are easier to do in MSSQL. So, if you have to analyze data from a lot of different data sources, it becomes much easier. However, the usage of the particular product depends on the project. Personally, I would like to work on MySQL. But in certain cases where the application scale is very large, and custom models from certain regions of the globe prefer Microsoft, then we have to go with MSSQL. But technically, there is not much difference.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has very amazing smart grid query feature for very fast aggregate queries across millions of rows"

"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is easy to use and implement."

"It is an established open-source database with a vast array of resources available, ensuring you can learn everything needed."

"MySQL is very stable and works beautifully with large amounts of data."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"The access to a suite of management and administration tools that simplify tasks such as database provisioning, configuration, and monitoring."

"It's easy to use."

"The most valuable aspect of the product is data migration."

"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service handles data easily."

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service pros

Cons

"Only the data from the columns that reached 2GB will actually decrease. Other columns below 2GB in size do not leave the disk."

"The solution should offer memory management."

"There could be improvements, particularly in Firebird, where the indexing is limited to just a single B-tree index, leading to poor performance for large-scale queries."

"Sometimes, we face syntax issues with the solution."

"There might be minor improvements, however, I can’t identify any particular areas for improvement at the moment."

"Sometimes MySQL does upgrades on the server. When we are still using the old server and when they integrate the upgrade, they don't carry along some of the old syntaxes. The versions don't sync."

"There could be more courses where the people could learn more easily how to use the tool."

"In a production environment, upgrading from a lower to an upper version is a very long process that needs to be improved."

"MySQL should have some kind of native query browser. If it could come with a built-in connector."

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our pricing was based on server instances and it was actually very cheap compared to Oracle. I guess you get what you pay for."

"The license is expensive."

"The solution’s paid plans are expensive."

"It is an open-source product."

"Oracle has a better licensing model compared to its competitors."

"The product is expensive."

"The product is free since it is an open-source tool."

"While the core solution itself is not exorbitant, the support services are associated with a significant maintenance fee, often ranging from twenty to thirty percent."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service handles data easily.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

I have never paid for the full version of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service. We use the free version or the version available in RDS ( /products/amazon-rds-reviews ) from AWS ( /products/amazon-aws-review...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service should be easier to replicate and integrate into further solutions. Although it targets Linux and UNIX environments, its performance is not as optimized on Windows platfo...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Firebird SQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 57% of the time

MySQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 43% of the time

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Infobright DB

April 2025

Download Infobright DB product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

April 2025

Download Oracle MySQL Cloud Service product report

Also Known As

Infobright

No data available

Overview

Infobright's high performance analytic database is designed for analyzing large volumes of machine-generated data

Ignite Technologies

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service delivers a secure, cost-effective and enterprise-grade MySQL database service. Built on MySQL Enterprise Edition and powered by the Oracle Cloud, it provides a simple, automated, integrated and enterprise ready MySQL cloud service, enabling organizations to increase business agility and reduce costs.

Oracle

Sample Customers

REZ-1, SonicWALL, IntegriChain, Fuseforward International Inc., Polystar, Live Rail, Mavenir Systems, JDSU Partners, Bango

Omnis, Naveex, Rehash Technologies

Buyer's Guide

Infobright DB vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

April 2025

Free Report: Infobright DB vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Find out what your peers are saying about Infobright DB vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Infobright DB vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.