IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

Infoblox NetMRI vs SolarWinds Network Automation Manager comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The price of SolarWinds Network Automation Manager is fair. However, it is more expensive than ConnectWise."
  • More SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    596,970 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer: 
    The price of SolarWinds Network Automation Manager is fair. However, it is more expensive than ConnectWise.
    Top Answer: 
    We did not like SolarWinds because it was not able to communicate between UPSA and our accounting system. They should have better integration. In the future release, there could be better threat… more »
    Ranking
    13th
    out of 20 in Network Automation
    Views
    1,621
    Comparisons
    1,013
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    12th
    out of 20 in Network Automation
    Views
    271
    Comparisons
    67
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    416
    Rating
    5.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    NetMRI
    SolarWinds NAM
    Learn More
    Overview

    Infoblox NetMRI enables you to smartly manage your multi-vendor network with automation, visibility and continuous insight. Today’s network infrastructures are more complex than ever–increasingly diverse, siloed and powered by multiple vendors. IT admins often struggle to meet escalating demands for service delivery and reliability in these environments. Infoblox NetMRI can help. Our network change and configuration management solution automates routine workflows such as device provisioning and security operations. By simplifying and streamlining network management, NetMRI enables tighter compliance, faster incident response and quicker app deployment.

    Scale environments from 1,000 to tens of thousands of nodes with comprehensive performance, traffic, WAN, and switch port monitoring, automated change and configuration management, and IP address management in an integrated network automation software solution.

    Offer
    Learn more about Infoblox NetMRI
    Learn more about SolarWinds Network Automation Manager
    Sample Customers
    BlueCross BlueShield
    Maalem Financing Company, School City of Hammond
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Government8%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Network Automation
    April 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, VMware, Cisco and others in Network Automation. Updated: April 2022.
    596,970 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Infoblox NetMRI is ranked 13th in Network Automation while SolarWinds Network Automation Manager is ranked 12th in Network Automation with 2 reviews. Infoblox NetMRI is rated 0.0, while SolarWinds Network Automation Manager is rated 5.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SolarWinds Network Automation Manager writes "Good technical support and documentation with an easy initial setup". Infoblox NetMRI is most compared with SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager, NetBrain, Cisco DNA Center, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform and DX Spectrum, whereas SolarWinds Network Automation Manager is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform.

    See our list of best Network Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Network Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.