Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Fischer Identity Governance vs Imanami GroupID comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Fischer Identity Governance
Average Rating
6.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Identity Management (IM) (45th)
Imanami GroupID
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
User Provisioning Software (12th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (36th), Active Directory Management (19th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Identity and Access Management solutions, they serve different purposes. Fischer Identity Governance is designed for Identity Management (IM) and holds a mindshare of 0.5%, up 0.3% compared to last year.
Imanami GroupID, on the other hand, focuses on User Provisioning Software, holds 1.9% mindshare, up 1.1% since last year.
Identity Management (IM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Fischer Identity Governance0.5%
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud12.2%
Microsoft Entra ID8.8%
Other78.5%
Identity Management (IM)
User Provisioning Software Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Imanami GroupID1.9%
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud22.5%
One Identity Manager11.2%
Other64.4%
User Provisioning Software
 

Featured Reviews

it_user186309 - PeerSpot reviewer
Identity Management Specialist at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Initial setup was a bit complex because we needed to implement lots of workflows.
Self-service Workflow building Audit For the time when we have to implement re-certification for special accounts this was the best for our requirements. It would be better to have a PowerShell connector Documentation can be improved Performance tuning should be better I have been working on…
Jonathan Cauthorn - PeerSpot reviewer
Identity and Access Management Manager at a insurance company with 201-500 employees
Simplifies the task of managing groups and is affordable and easy to implement
I'd like to see it be able to do more than just groups. I'd like it to be able to do some things with email distribution lists as well. It can do that, but there were a few things that were limiting. It was difficult to get it set up, particularly with Azure in the cloud. I'd like that to be a little bit smoother. I'd like to see a better user interface. It works, but it is clunky. There should be better import and export of LDAP queries and better management tools. We've got a ton of groups, and it does take quite a while to do nightly processing. This is something that definitely needs improvement.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"For the time when we have to implement re-certification for special accounts this was the best for our requirements."
"Imanami GroupID's UI is good."
"I have found the overall features to be useful."
"For each job code, we go through and determine the access they're supposed to have to the system. Based on that job code, we use the query tool and say that anybody who is in this job code gets these groups added to them, or conversely, if they change job codes, it removes the ones that they shouldn't have and adds the one they should. That runs every night, and the next day, everybody has the job codes they're supposed to have."
 

Cons

"Performance tuning should be better."
"The product's implementation is complex. It should also work on GPO."
"The mobile application needs to be improved and there should be chatbox features to allow users to easily reach out for assistance."
"I'd like to see a better user interface. It works, but it is clunky. There should be better import and export of LDAP queries and better management tools."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The price of the solution is reasonable."
"It is on a yearly basis, and it has the product license fee and the support for it. So, there is the licensing fee, and there is the annual maintenance that includes the support. I don't remember exactly, but we're probably paying somewhere in the neighborhood of $20,000 to $30,000 for it per year. We've got a pretty large implementation of it, and for the amount that we do, it is a pretty good deal. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Management (IM) solutions are best for your needs.
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
14%
Media Company
12%
Comms Service Provider
10%
University
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

Fischer Identity, Fischer International Fischer Identity Suite, Fischer Identity Suite
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Maryland Institute College of Art
Grant Thornton LLP
Find out what your peers are saying about SailPoint, Microsoft, One Identity and others in Identity Management (IM). Updated: February 2026.
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.