IFS Cloud Platform vs ManageEngine IT Asset Management comparison

IFS and ManageEngine are both solutions in the IT Asset Management category. IFS is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0, while ManageEngine is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.5. IFS holds a 1.6% mindshare in IAM, compared to ManageEngine’s 6.9% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of IFS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.

IFS Cloud Platform

Read 30 IFS Cloud Platform reviews

380 Views
72 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

ManageEngine IT Asset Manag...

Read 8 ManageEngine IT Asset Management reviews

1,008 Views
672 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IFS Cloud Platform

ManageEngine IT Asset Manag...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

IFS Cloud Platform and ManageEngine IT Asset Management compete in IT management. While each has unique strengths, IFS Cloud offers comprehensive integration, whereas ManageEngine provides specialized asset management.

Features: IFS Cloud Platform provides extensive business process integration, enhanced financial analytics, and robust project management capabilities. ManageEngine IT Asset Management excels in detailed asset tracking, efficient license management, and automated patch deployment.

Room for Improvement: IFS Cloud Platform could improve ease of use, simplify its user interface, and enhance initial deployment speed. ManageEngine IT Asset Management might benefit from expanded reporting capabilities, more comprehensive customization options, and improved integration with third-party systems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine IT Asset Management is known for easy installation and responsive customer service. IFS Cloud Platform requires a more involved setup and can have a more complex support structure.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine IT Asset Management offers a competitive pricing model, promising strong ROI with low initial costs. IFS Cloud Platform, though potentially higher in initial investment, offers extensive functionality that can lead to significant long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed IFS Cloud Platform vs. ManageEngine IT Asset Management Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IFS Cloud Platform vs. ManageEngine IT Asset Management

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,162 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IFS Cloud Platform

Ranking in IT Asset Management

10th

Ranking in License Management

2nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

CRM (21st), Customer Experience Management (7th), Field Service Management (2nd), Help Desk Software (12th), ERP (12th), Activity Based Costing Software (7th), Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) (2nd), Local Government CRM (9th), IT Service Management (ITSM) (11th)

ManageEngine IT Asset Manag...

Ranking in IT Asset Management

8th

Ranking in License Management

6th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the IT Asset Management category, the mindshare of IFS Cloud Platform is 1.6%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine IT Asset Management is 6.9%, up from 4.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Asset Management

Featured Reviews

Brendan Fisher

IFS Applications Consultant at Zest Business Process Management Ltd

Robust, customizable, and modern

IFS is a very large and complex software, and implementation of IFS can be challenging and may lead to a difficult lengthy project. It can take between 12 and 24 months in some cases to deploy. I have found that not all clients are fully aware of how big the task is that they're undertaking when they make a decision to move to software like this. Companies need to be more aware of the complexity of an ERP implementation project and while I fully recommend moving to IFS, it is not easy and does require business change when adopting an ERP solution. New features are a difficult ask - I work across multiple industries and everyone would probably choose a different feature. Maybe BIM in Construction or Customs link-ups for importers/exporters.

Read full review

Md Abdul Hakim

System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited

Helpful smart automation and tracking that can be used with minimal adjustments

This is a recording system, and it's an automation system. It's very smart. I use it with minimal adjustments needed. The focus is on test management. Everything can be tracked from asset management. Asset management offers many facilities. It doesn't require additional training for ManageEngine or technicians. Assets are simply reported from the dashboard, indicating where IT is missing, where compliance is mentioned, or where action is needed, with driver updates. All facilities are available in the enterprise edition, allowing users, customers, or any organization to easily obtain their referred insights. Anyone can easily install it. There are no handbells. An app provides instructions, with documentation available. Sometimes, IT issues arise like fraud blocking or service-related problems. Upon facing an issue, feedback is integrated, and the solution is provided from their end. This is a very IT-friendly solution. We get LiveSat and IT management. Facilities are accessible, like exporting the installation folder, making the migration process easy. Failover or redundancy can occur within two to five hours, making it scalable. This is a very stable solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is quite flexible."

"The workflow of the solution is very good."

"There are fewer fields on the user screen compared to other products. This makes the UI a little bit easier to understand."

"IFS Applications' best feature is the user-friendly interface that has a .NET Framework application in the front end and an Oracle database and WebLogic middleware."

"IFS has been completely rebuilt, modernized, and cloud-based so we don't need bulky software installations."

"There are fewer fields on the user screen compared to other products."

"All the modules are valuable in their own right, but everything has to go through the ERP. IFS has done an excellent job integrating the various modules to complete these processes. My expertise is in the finance module, but I have used the other verticals. It's an all-around good product."

"A high level of ERP can be handled in IFS."

More IFS Cloud Platform pros

"It's very smart. I use it with minimal adjustments needed."

"ManageEngine IT Asset Management helps with guarantee and warranty period management, license expiration tracking, device patches, and integration with our finance system for depreciation and invoicing."

"The technical support is great."

"The ability to define custom templates for asset management helps track assets, budgets, warranties, and expiries effectively."

"The most valuable component of the ITSM tool is the help desk due to its organized way of raising tickets."

"The auto-discovery feature has helped us a lot."

"As far as IT Asset Management is concerned, I would rate it at ten out of ten."

"In my opinion, it is the MDM; patch management and deployment are the valuable features."

More ManageEngine IT Asset Management pros

Cons

"I have seen that one of the areas that my company has identified for improvement might be the rental management capabilities within the solution."

"IFS uses Crystal Report mostly, which isn't too user-friendly. Developing reports isn't easy and requires a lot of dev time. Since SAP bought it, Crystal Report has become more complicated to use on IFS. You have a dashboard for reporting that is good, but it's incomplete. Most of our clients use Power BI or some additional tooling for BI."

"Aspects of HR and payroll could be better."

"There should be some improvements in the predefined templates in IFS Applications."

"Documentation-wise, they need more."

"The support provided by IFS Applications has room for improvement. I'm based in Poland, and when my company had an issue, finding people from IFS to give my company the support it needed was difficult."

"An area for improvement would be transactions, which can be tedious to complete as the process is very complex."

"Customization needs to be improved."

More IFS Cloud Platform cons

"I would love to see a digital adoption feature or guide that navigates first-time users through the application, as it is quite complex with many relevant and irrelevant elements."

"The engineering area needs improvement."

"The assets that can be discovered are pretty easy to manage, but there should be a better way to manage non-discoverable assets. Our development team works on bots and tests particular hardware. They have got different varieties of hardware. They want a feature for managing these assets within a warehouse kind of environment. For example, our IT has received 100 items, and they have assigned these items as a bulk unit to a project manager. The project manager further wants to distribute these items within his or her team. Instead of maintaining a separate Excel sheet, the project manager should be able to reallocate these items from within the tool so that we have hierarchical entities for the same unit."

"It requires some development to be better, more comfortable, and usable, enhancing customer satisfaction."

"I would love to see a digital adoption feature or guide that navigates first-time users through the application, as it is quite complex with many relevant and irrelevant elements."

"The asset management tool is costly."

"Responses from ManageEngine should be faster."

"I hope it includes barcode features, as barcode scanning and MacAdes cannot currently be mapped with this field."

More ManageEngine IT Asset Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing of the solution may appear to be expensive for smaller companies with only tens of users; however, for larger and mid-size industrial companies, IFS is able to win deals and the pricing is competitive in the market."

"IFS Applications are competitive in terms of pricing compared to other vendors, such as SAP, Oracle, and Epicor. They are generally cheaper, especially for licensing costs."

"Ask for all-inclusive pricing, as they are pretty flexible if you ask for custom models."

"IFS Applications is expensive software, but it's on par with SAP and Oracle. It's for large enterprises and government entities and not for small and medium-sized enterprises. They have one licensing model, but if you want to have a module-specific license, they provide component-based licenses. Unlike SAP and Oracle, it doesn't have different levels of licensing. It's one level of licensing."

"There are varying license levels that you can purchase."

"Pricing is an area that could be improved. They could be more competitive."

"There's an additional yearly cost for support."

"The product is reasonably priced."

More IFS Cloud Platform pricing and cost advice

"Its price is reasonable, but I wish it was lower."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Asset Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

20%

Manufacturing Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Healthcare Company

10%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IFS Applications?

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine or ten out of ten since it is an extremely scalable solution that can be used for various use cases with thousands of users.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IFS Applications?

The product is reasonably priced. The costs are justified by the value provided, considering the comprehensive features and minimal need for customization. I rate the pricing a seven out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IFS Applications?

I am not able to recall much about batch. Documentation-wise, they need more. There is not much available online, and the documentation availability is on the lower side compared to other products,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine IT Asset Management?

The pricing of ManageEngine IT Asset Management is publicly available, so customers can verify its fairness. Some companies may request discounts, which ManageEngine can provide. The licensing mode...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine IT Asset Management?

So far, I'm not getting any requirement to improve. Everything required by end users seems to be available with ManageEngine IT Asset Management ( /products/manageengine-it-asset-management-reviews...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering ManageEngine IT Asset Management?

I rate their support at nine on a scale of one to ten. As far as IT Asset Management is concerned, I would rate it at ten out of ten. The overall product rating is ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP ERP vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 17% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Maximo vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 10% of the time

SAP S/4HANA vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 9% of the time

ServiceNow vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 6% of the time

More IFS Cloud Platform Competitors

Lansweeper vs ManageEngine IT Asset Management

Compared 68% of the time

ServiceNow vs ManageEngine IT Asset Management

Compared 10% of the time

Device42 vs ManageEngine IT Asset Management

Compared 4% of the time

BMC Remedy vs ManageEngine IT Asset Management

Compared 4% of the time

Snow License Manager vs ManageEngine IT Asset Management

Compared 4% of the time

More ManageEngine IT Asset Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IFS Cloud Platform

June 2025

Download IFS Cloud Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine IT Asset Management

May 2025

Download ManageEngine IT Asset Management product report

Also Known As

IFS Applications, Assyst, IFS Cloud

No data available

Overview

IFS is the world’s leading provider of Industrial AI and enterprise software for hardcore businesses that make, service, and power our planet. Our technology enables businesses which manufacture goods, maintain complex assets, and manage service-focused operations to unlock the transformative power of Industrial AI™ to enhance productivity, efficiency, and sustainability. Industrial AI is IFS.ai.

IFS Cloud is a fully composable AI-powered platform, designed for ultimate flexibility and adaptability to our customers’ specific requirements and business evolution. It spans the needs of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP), Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Supply Chain Management (SCM), Information Technology Service Management (ITSM), and Field Service Management (FSM). IFS technology leverages AI, machine learning, real-time data and analytics to empower our customers to make informed strategic decisions and excel at their Moment of Service™.

IFS

ManageEngine AssetExplorer is a web-based IT Asset Management (ITAM) software that helps you monitor and manage assets in your network from Planning phase to Disposal phase. AssetExplorer provides you with a number of ways to ensure discovery of all the assets in your network. You can manage software & hardware assets, ensure software license compliance and track purchase orders & contracts - the whole nine yards! AssetExplorer is very easy to install and works right out of the box.

ManageEngine

Sample Customers

China Airlines, Electrolux Group, Babcock, Cimcorp, Sky, Multiplex, Veolia.

TRA

Buyer's Guide

IFS Cloud Platform vs. ManageEngine IT Asset Management

June 2025

Free Report: IFS Cloud Platform vs. ManageEngine IT Asset Management

Find out what your peers are saying about IFS Cloud Platform vs. ManageEngine IT Asset Management and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IFS Cloud Platform vs. ManageEngine IT Asset Management report.

See our list of best IT Asset Management vendors and best License Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.