Idira IGA vs Microsoft Entra Workload ID comparison

Idira by Palo Alto Networks and Microsoft are both solutions in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category. Idira by Palo Alto Networks is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.7, while Microsoft is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.5. Idira by Palo Alto Networks holds a 1.4% mindshare in IAMS, compared to Microsoft’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Idira by Palo Alto Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Idira IGA

Read 14 Idira IGA reviews

3,247 Views
1,526 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Entra Workload ID

Read 3 Microsoft Entra Workload ID reviews

1,240 Views
880 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Idira IGA

Microsoft Entra Workload ID

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 2, 2026

Idira IGA and Microsoft Entra Workload ID are competing products in the identity governance and administration market. Microsoft Entra Workload ID holds a stronger position due to its comprehensive feature set and robust cloud-native capabilities.

Features: Idira IGA offers intuitive identity governance tailored for compliance and access management, focusing on simplicity and user-friendliness. It also provides robust security measures and efficient access control. Microsoft Entra Workload ID includes extensive cloud-native integration, automation features, and advanced identity protection services, delivering an enhanced operational framework. Its scalability supports diverse workloads, making it a feature-rich option.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Idira IGA ensures a straightforward deployment with solid customer support, facilitating a seamless implementation experience. Microsoft Entra Workload ID's deployment is more complex due to its broad capabilities but is balanced by exceptional customer service and thorough integration support, which help navigate its complexity effectively.

Pricing and ROI: Idira IGA is known for competitive setup costs and rapid ROI, benefiting from cost-effective delivery. Microsoft Entra Workload ID, although requiring a potentially higher initial investment, offers a scalable framework and long-term ROI benefits with its extensive functionalities, providing worthwhile investment returns and significant performance enhancements over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Idira IGA vs. Microsoft Entra Workload ID Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Idira IGA vs. Microsoft Entra Workload ID

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Idira IGA

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

6th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Identity Management (IM) (6th), Identity Governance Administration (IGA) (5th)

Microsoft Entra Workload ID

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

20th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Microsoft Security Suite (31st)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category, the mindshare of Idira IGA is 1.4%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Entra Workload ID is 0.8%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Idira IGA	1.4%
Microsoft Entra Workload ID	0.8%
Other	97.8%

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

Featured Reviews

Sasikiran Sakalabattina

V Mware And Vector Administration at Tech Mahindra Limited

Automated lifecycle governance has reduced manual access work and strengthens audit readiness

CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla significantly reduces manual access management efforts due to day-to-day activities. RBAC and role mining actually reduce manual access management efforts significantly. RBAC is the best feature, and it provides AI capabilities. The second feature I value most is identifying lifecycle management for joiner, mover, and leaver scenarios. CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla has one feature that provides strong access reviews, compliance reports, automation, and audit readiness with centralized governance. Centralized governance means we can handle everything at one point, making it a very strong feature. This is integrated with another feature such as SaaS integrations for strong security posture and faster provisioning with reduced operational overhead. These are the four features I value most, and with all my three years of experience, I use and appreciate these four features most. The impact of automation on my access reviews is that it automates the provisioning and de-provisioning. If I were to perform manual tasks such as provisioning and de-provisioning without automation, it would require a lot of time to handle. With this automation, we easily accomplish provisioning or de-provisioning. We simply get the Active Directory users and create the VPNs, cloud, and enterprise applications without any manual intervention. AI-driven role management and RBAC automation significantly reduce service tickets. Without automation, I would need to handle tickets, which involve a lot of manual work and requires additional manual employees. Without automation, this leads to approval delays and manual access assignment efforts. Automated access reviews provide simple audit reports, and by complying with the report, it improves audit readiness while reducing operational workload for IT and security teams.

Read full review

reviewer2772159

Postdoctoral Researcher at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Have experienced ongoing challenges integrating with existing workflows despite strong foundational capabilities

I don't know how I would assess the impact of AI-powered threat detection for us. It has helped with security operations in general; I'm being very cagey here, Damian. You can understand why. Where I work, there is a directory services team. There is a security team. The security team may have several different departments in there. I think they are behind the times. That's about as far as what I would say. We may have the modern firewalls and detections and all the rest of it, but I think from a modern way of working, which the identity is a user which is any device, any place, anywhere, from anything, okay, securely, they're not quite up with that concept, in my opinion. The review rating is 8.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The depth of information has helped my team by integrating with PAM and giving us a holistic view based on the access management, identity threat detections, and identity governance, providing a very broad umbrella to solve things based on security layers."

"We had these spreadsheets all over the place, but now we have a library of evidence to consult when needed. Zilla keeps everything in one place. It's not scattered all over anymore."

"The best feature is the secure logins and secure connections."

"CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla is a very stable product, and I do not see a lot of issues with it most of the time."

"CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla is a very new and advanced way of giving the access to an end-user by AI-powered automation, which uses an AI profile to automatically discover and maintain job-appropriate permissions, which is a very helpful and powerful module in an enterprise business."

"Idira IGA now serves as a comprehensive solution that suits all of our needs."

"The features of CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla that I have found the most valuable include credential masking, time-bound access, and using it for the approval of workflows and audit trails for compliance-related tasks."

"After implementing CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla, it puts the organization at a very high security level by reducing risk and threats to platforms."

More Idira IGA pros

"We have various options available with Microsoft Entra, such as B2B cross-tenant guest member accesses, and we can invite users and perform activities from that area, while we are also dealing with Azure IaaS, infrastructure as a service, which has different IAM platforms existing with resources or subscriptions."

"I would evaluate the customer service or technical support with Microsoft for Entra products as well; we are a strategic partner, so we're one of 500 companies that can talk to them directly."

"The product enables organizations to synchronize users to Microsoft 365 products."

Cons

"Idira IGA platform itself is somewhat complex to understand initially, so the UI and user interface could be simplified."

"Organizations with highly customized, long-standing legacy IGA tools may face a steep learning curve and complex data migration when moving to this modern AI-driven or cloud-native solution."

"Maybe this is coming with their AI module, but I would like to see a feature that performs baseline analysis of permissions that may not fit into a role, and it attempts to group them into a role. We've run into problems with applications where someone has not created a role but assigned ad hoc permissions to a user. We still need to do some manual work to identify the group that the user belongs to. It would be amazing to have Zilla streamline that."

"There is a higher cost model for the initial setup as compared to the other ecosystem lock tools like Google Cloud or Azure Cloud identity."

"I believe CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla can be improved by simplifying the workflow and the UI for managing access requests and approvals."

"For improvement, I would suggest enhancing the reporting functionality of CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla, as it could benefit from more customization or advanced filtering for auditing purposes."

"Improvement suggestions for CyberArk include addressing the on-premises deployment processes, which require a very skilled engineer to handle because of the complexity of the environments involved."

"Idira IGA can be improved in addressing our core pain point of joiner, leaver, and remover, which we identify with SSO, MFA, read admin access, PAM request, and the process holistic view and hierarchy, particularly in the model and the integration part based on the HRM module or JD Edward module."

More Idira IGA cons

"In my opinion, Microsoft Entra Workload ID can be improved in several ways."

"Integration with existing IAM solutions has not helped our identity management processes; it's all of the things that are in front of Directory and Entra, such as SalePoint and other toolsets, give us one of the worst identity experiences I think I've ever come across, which is why I'm trying to change it."

"Integration with other products must be made easier."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It has been fair because we have been in from the beginning or close to the beginning. I know it is not truly an identity access management system yet, but its price was one of the appealing factors for us to purchase it at the time. It was reasonably priced."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Retailer

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	9

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zilla Security?

Pricing-wise, I find Idira IGA very competitive compared to other IGA tools available in the market.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zilla Security?

Currently, they are improving significantly, and whenever vulnerabilities arrive, they notify customers. Whenever they upgrade versions, they notify customers. This is very good. Whenever we contac...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zilla Security?

In our day-to-day activities, we use Idira IGA for storing passwords, rotating passwords, and securing connections. We support users and onboard user accounts, elevated accounts, privileged account...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Entra Workload ID?

In my opinion, Microsoft Entra Workload ID can be improved in several ways.Particularly about Microsoft Entra Workload ID, I think they still could improve categorization, which still has some room...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Microsoft Entra Workload ID?

I'm a consultant and not using the products myself, but rather in a capacity more as a consultant or reseller.I am not familiar with remote access products by ManageEngine. I do not use ManageEngin...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Entra Workload ID?

I'm working on that area while still looking for a new solution or already using ManageEngine Password Manager or Microsoft Entra ID.I've been dealing both with ManageEngine and Microsoft. I am mos...

See all answers

Comparisons

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Idira IGA

Compared 13% of the time

Veza vs Idira IGA

Compared 10% of the time

Lumos vs Idira IGA

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Idira IGA

Compared 6% of the time

Opal vs Idira IGA

Compared 4% of the time

More Idira IGA Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Entra Workload ID

Compared 49% of the time

Google Titan Security Key vs Microsoft Entra Workload ID

Compared 23% of the time

Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs Microsoft Entra Workload ID

Compared 16% of the time

Google Cloud Identity vs Microsoft Entra Workload ID

Compared 12% of the time

More Microsoft Entra Workload ID Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Idira IGA

August 2026

Download Idira IGA product report

Buyer's Guide

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

July 2026

Download Microsoft Entra Workload ID product report

Also Known As

Zilla Security

No data available

Overview

CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla is designed to streamline identity governance and administration by automating access controls and compliance processes, enhancing security and efficiency.

Known for its robust capabilities, CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla offers comprehensive identity governance that simplifies policy enforcement and compliance management. It enables organizations to efficiently manage user access, reducing risks and ensuring secure operations. By leveraging automation, it minimizes manual tasks and enhances productivity.

What are the key features?

Automated Access Controls: Reduces the need for manual processes by streamlining access management.
Compliance Management: Facilitates adherence to regulatory standards with built-in compliance features.
Risk Reduction: Identifies and mitigates potential security threats with advanced risk analytics.
Scalability: Supports growth by efficiently handling expanding user bases and increasing security demands.

Which benefits or ROI should users consider?

Enhanced Security: Provides robust protection against unauthorized access.
Improved Efficiency: Automates tasks to save time and resources.
Compliance Assurance: Simplifies the process of meeting regulatory requirements.
Cost-Effectiveness: Reduces expenses associated with manual identity management processes.

CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla is implemented across industries such as finance and healthcare, where regulatory compliance and data protection are critical. It helps organizations enhance their security postures while ensuring compliance with industry standards.

Idira by Palo Alto Networks

Microsoft Entra Workload ID enhances identity management by providing secure and efficient access control for applications and workloads. It is designed to streamline processes and strengthen security measures, catering to complex IT environments.

Microsoft Entra Workload ID delivers a unified and secure method for managing workload identities across cloud environments. It addresses key challenges in handling access control, ensuring that applications have appropriate permissions without compromising security. Known for its reliability, it assists enterprises in minimizing risks associated with identity mismanagement.

What are the most valuable features of Microsoft Entra Workload ID?

Identity Management: Centralizes control of application identities to simplify monitoring and adjustments.
Access Control: Offers robust access permissions tailored to workload-specific needs, enhancing security.
Policy Enforcement: Ensures consistent application of security policies across multiple environments.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

Improved Security: Reduces risks associated with identity theft and unauthorized access.
Efficiency Gains: Streamlines identity management tasks, leading to resource optimization.
Scalability: Supports growing needs without compromising performance or security.

Industries such as finance and healthcare have implemented Microsoft Entra Workload ID to strengthen compliance and security in cloud operations. Its features are tailored to meet regulatory standards and protect sensitive data, making it a suitable choice for sectors requiring stringent identity management protocols.

Microsoft

Buyer's Guide

Idira IGA vs. Microsoft Entra Workload ID

August 2026

Free Report: Idira IGA vs. Microsoft Entra Workload ID

Find out what your peers are saying about Idira IGA vs. Microsoft Entra Workload ID and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Idira IGA vs. Microsoft Entra Workload ID report.

See our list of best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.