Icinga vs ScienceLogic comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Icinga and ScienceLogic are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Icinga is ranked #51, while ScienceLogic is ranked #20 with an average rating of 9.0. Icinga holds a 1.3% mindshare in IM, compared to ScienceLogic’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Icinga users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of ScienceLogic users who would recommend it.

Icinga

Read 17 Icinga reviews

8,249 Views
5,114 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

ScienceLogic

Read 46 ScienceLogic reviews

12,794 Views
6,397 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Icinga

ScienceLogic

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 6, 2024

ScienceLogic and Icinga are robust monitoring solutions with considerable user followings. ScienceLogic generally fares better in terms of features and customer service, while Icinga excels in pricing and ROI.

Features: ScienceLogic users highlight comprehensive integration with various IT systems and strong automation capabilities. Icinga users appreciate its modular architecture and flexibility in monitoring diverse environments. Despite Icinga's adaptability, ScienceLogic's extensive built-in integrations give it an edge in feature set satisfaction.

Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic users suggest improvements in reporting and enhanced UI customization. Icinga users indicate a need for better documentation and improved scaling capabilities. The differences highlight that while ScienceLogic could benefit from better user customization, Icinga must focus more on enhancing support materials and scalability options to match user expectations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic is noted for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Icinga, however, often requires more initial configuration, and users report varied experiences with support quality. Therefore, ScienceLogic leads in ease of deployment and customer service due to its more user-friendly setup and consistent support experience.

Pricing and ROI: Users find Icinga's open-source model more cost-effective with a quicker ROI. ScienceLogic, although more expensive, delivers high value through feature-rich tools that justify its higher cost. Thus, Icinga tends to be favored for cost efficiency, whereas ScienceLogic is recognized for its comprehensive value despite higher pricing.

To learn more, read our detailed Icinga vs. ScienceLogic Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Icinga vs. ScienceLogic

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,523 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Icinga

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

49th

Ranking in Server Monitoring

17th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

51st

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

35th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ScienceLogic

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

23rd

Ranking in Server Monitoring

12th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

20th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

17th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (6th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), IT Operations Analytics (10th), AIOps (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Icinga is 1.3%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ScienceLogic is 1.7%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ScienceLogic	1.7%
Icinga	1.3%
Other	97.0%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

reviewer2292201

Innovation Service Manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Easy to use, and it's possible to customize the product as per the needs we may have but average multi-tenancy aspect

It's supported by the community. We use Icinga, which is not part of the Open-Source platform but is wrapped into a commercial solution from another provider, a local provider in Italy. Icinga is an open-source platform, so it is supported by the community. It's quite easy to use, and it's possible to customize the product as per the needs we may have. So it's not expensive, and it's quite a general purpose. We can easily monitor any kind of infrastructure we encounter. The ability to customize scripts and build your own queries to request information from the infrastructure elements you want to monitor. This level of personalization and customization is highly appreciated. The alerting is the same as any other monitoring platform. It's not a "wow" feature that has changed our lives, but it's perfectly adequate.

Read full review

Michael Wenn

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

Offers comprehensive monitoring and tool consolidation but integration complexity needs improvement

There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks. Although these prebuilt features are great, there is considerable complexity in bringing them together to create a unified dashboard. Even with many good integrations and deep visibility, the implementation takes time, especially when it doesn't involve these integrations. While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise. It's challenging for new customers to implement independently. The implementation speed of non-PowerPack or non-out-of-the-box integrations should be improved. Additionally, the AI automation feature is not yet very rich due to resource constraints supporting a wide platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Icinga has multiple automation and integration features. There is an API for everything and a web UI for configurations. The APIs enable you to automate tasks in Icinga. We can also use plugins to talk to the API. The Icinga Director talks to a database in the background, and you can import settings from the CMDB to all systems in Icinga."

"It is really easy in Icinga to create your own plugin and integrate it without any fuss. And it works just perfectly fine."

"I like the ability to amend and adjust things really easily, which is useful in a case where you could make it auto-discover and then set a template to say all of these applications or servers under this template have an automatic threshold set that you’d set up manually."

"People should know that it is simple and advanced."

"The ability to customize scripts and build your own queries to request information from the infrastructure elements you want to monitor. This level of personalization and customization is highly appreciated."

"The most valuable feature is one that not many are even aware of, as Icinga has a self-healing event handler where if the service is down, it is automatically restarted, and you can configure the handler to take action after the critical alarm without human interaction."

"The apply rules feature saves a lot of time."

"The value of Icinga is that it has hundreds of plugins, so it's really easy to monitor pretty much anything."

More Icinga pros

"We chose the ScienceLogic platform because it really met and exceeded all of the requirements that we had put forth in the RFI."

"Science Logic provides distributed and all-in-one concept in monitoring, you can easily customize the features in this product."

"After deploying ScienceLogic in our infrastructure and configured IT services around our critical applications we have experienced a considerable drop in major incidents which impact our customers."

"It has allowed us to grow, as we’re able to offer new services to our customers that they didn't have in the past, opening a whole new door of monitoring offerings to our customers and what we can provide for them on top of what we already are providing."

"The customer service and support has been the best of any vendor I have had experience dealing with in my professional history."

"Their customer service is unparalleled."

"ScienceLogic's custom enablement, which I can achieve as a Python developer, is unique."

"It has a lot of integration capabilities as well; we can integrate with a lot of things, monitor emails and APIs, handle customization and automation, and there is a great dashboard with many features to take advantage of."

More ScienceLogic pros

Cons

"The solution lacks many features important to higher-level IT management and network support."

"Network Discovery capabilities would be extremely helpful."

"I think the software is quite good, but we have had problems with getting it to recognize certain areas and amend certain checks, where we needed so we would have to create backend scripts for those checks. Though, being open source, it has the support to create backend scripts, it would be better to have these scripts in-built."

"One of the areas that are frustrating is remote monitoring for more than one machine."

"Icinga’s automation could be improved."

"There is room for improvement in multi-tenancy. It's not perfect, not even really good. It's average, but it should be improved."

"In general, the product does not look good. However, it does what it is supposed to do. So, the improvements should focus on usability and UI."

"We have found some problems with Nagios, and support isn't very responsive."

More Icinga cons

"They should improve database issues in HA and Failover mode, and provide documentation for all users , even if they are not customers."

"The UI takes a bit to learn but once you get past that it gets the job done."

"They should improve their support process and add chat."

"They need a little more self-service."

"The product is not user-friendly."

"It was challenging onboarding users."

"As we have increased the amount of devices and the range of those devices we have run in to scaling issues which will most likely cause us to stand up a brand new instance of ScienceLogic to meet our needs."

"Reporting is still a gigantic pain point, we invest a lot of cycles in manufacturing reports off-board -#notfun."

More ScienceLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We're using the free version of Icinga."

"It's an open-source solution."

"This is an open-source solution with paid support."

"It is cost-effective, and the return on investment can be very interesting because the price is low."

"The solution is cheap."

"Even though Icinga's financial cost is low, it is an expensive product regarding the resources required to maintain and operate it."

"The product is inexpensive compared to other DBM products."

"The solution is free to use."

"Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow."

"The solution is license-based. It's between $8 and $15, depending on what you need from the product."

"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."

"It comes with the OS built in, so no need to purchase an OS license or DB license."

"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution."

"The pricing model for ScienceLogic could improve."

"My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price."

"Pricing between the two is quiet large therefore you can save some money if you don't require to collect all info on each device."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

14%

University

13%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	27

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

I am interested in improving the flexibility of ScienceLogic's user interface, configuration, and customization. I am particularly keen on learning about issues raised by the ScienceLogic suppo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ScienceLogic?

Our usual use case of ScienceLogic is as a strategic monitoring tool for all the customers in our company, and because of that reason, all the accounts and projects are migrated from other monitori...

See all answers

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Icinga

Compared 8% of the time

Checkmk vs Icinga

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios XI vs Icinga

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios Core vs Icinga

Compared 3% of the time

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs Icinga

Compared 3% of the time

More Icinga Competitors

LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 5% of the time

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 4% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs ScienceLogic

Compared 3% of the time

Nagios XI vs ScienceLogic

Compared 3% of the time

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 3% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Icinga

October 2026

Download Icinga product report

Buyer's Guide

ScienceLogic

October 2026

Download ScienceLogic product report

Also Known As

Icinga Cloud Monitoring

No data available

Overview

Icinga is an open-source monitoring platform known for stability and scalability. It offers object-oriented configuration, extensive plugins, and community support, providing a robust environment for monitoring servers, network devices, and infrastructure components.

Icinga facilitates intuitive setup through features like the Icinga Director, allowing for efficient configuration, automation via APIs, and flexible customization with add-ons. It supports clustering for distributed monitoring and self-healing event handlers. Integration with external tools further enhances its adaptability. While valuable, users suggest improvements in dashboard aesthetics, installation procedures, and data consistency. Automation and network discovery capabilities require further development, as does the need for built-in scripts and plugins. Icinga proves complex for beginners, with multi-tenancy support rated average and role management needing simplification.

What are Icinga's main features?

Object-Oriented Configuration: Simplifies custom plugin development and setup.
Icinga Director: Facilitates intuitive and efficient configuration management.
API Automation: Enables automated processes and seamless integrations.
Clustering Support: Allows scalable and distributed monitoring solutions.
Self-Healing Event Handlers: Automatically manage and correct system issues.
Integration and Add-Ons: Expands functionality with external tools.

Which benefits do reviews often highlight?

Scalability: Easily adapts to growing monitoring needs.
Community Support: Access to a wide range of shared knowledge and solutions.
Customizability: Tailors the platform to meet specific monitoring requirements.
Stability: Delivers consistent performance and reliability.

Organizations use Icinga to monitor Linux and AIX servers along with network devices, storage, and firewalls. It supports resource surveillance, application checks, automated ticket generation, and alerting. Managed service providers use it for multi-tenancy setups, finding it essential for server health and configuration management across mixed infrastructure landscapes, leveraging plugins and SNMP Traps for proactive monitoring.

Icinga

ScienceLogic provides advanced monitoring and management capabilities designed to enhance operational efficiency across cloud and hybrid infrastructures, offering insights and automation for IT management.

Combining AI and machine learning, ScienceLogic offers dynamic mapping, agentless monitoring, and seamless integration with third-party tools. Customizable dashboards and extensive monitoring capabilities address complex environments efficiently. Its scalability and event management capabilities offer comprehensive coverage across infrastructure, applications, and networks, ensuring enhanced efficiency in hybrid IT environments.

What are the key features of ScienceLogic?

Dynamic Component Mapping: Automates infrastructure mapping for real-time operational insights.
Agentless Monitoring: Provides monitoring without the need for software agents, reducing overhead.
AI and Machine Learning: Enhances predictive capabilities and optimizes operational processes.
Seamless Integration: Integrates effortlessly with existing tools and platforms for a cohesive environment.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailors monitoring views to meet specific IT requirements.

What benefits should users seek when evaluating?

Improved Efficiency: Reduces downtime and enhances operational processes.
Scalability: Adapts to growing IT demands and infrastructure complexities.
Comprehensive Coverage: Ensures thorough monitoring across all IT environments.
Automation: Streamlines processes and improves incident response times.

Enterprise-grade IT environments leverage ScienceLogic for its powerful capabilities in hybrid monitoring and diagnostics. It integrates with ServiceNow for efficient ticketing and reporting, acting as a reliable source of truth. Supporting both cloud and on-premise deployments, ScienceLogic is employed across various industries for real-time incident automation and integrations.

ScienceLogic

Sample Customers

Puppet Labs, Audi, Spacex, Debian, Snapdeal, McGill, RIPE Network Coordination Centre

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell

Buyer's Guide

Icinga vs. ScienceLogic

October 2026

Free Report: Icinga vs. ScienceLogic

Find out what your peers are saying about Icinga vs. ScienceLogic and other solutions. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Icinga vs. ScienceLogic report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors, best Network Monitoring Software vendors, and best Server Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.