Icinga vs Loom Systems comparison

Icinga and ServiceNow are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Icinga is ranked #48, while ServiceNow is ranked #65. Icinga holds a 1.4% mindshare in IM, compared to ServiceNow’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Icinga users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of ServiceNow users who would recommend it.

Icinga

Read 17 Icinga reviews

7,233 Views
4,701 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Loom Systems

Read 4 Loom Systems reviews

1,657 Views
1,458 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Icinga

Loom Systems

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Icinga and Loom Systems compete in the IT monitoring space. Loom Systems appears to hold an advantage due to its use of AI-driven analytics.

Features: Icinga includes dynamic monitoring, extensive customization, and strong integration support. Loom Systems offers AI-powered predictive analytics, automatic anomaly detection, and proactive insights.

Room for Improvement: Icinga can enhance its AI capabilities, improve real-time analytics, and streamline its user interface. Loom Systems may benefit from expanding its integration options, reducing its initial implementation costs, and increasing support for open-source platforms.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Icinga offers straightforward deployment with robust community support, while Loom Systems emphasizes a streamlined deployment with professional service guidance.

Pricing and ROI: Icinga boasts low initial costs due to its open-source architecture, providing a favorable ROI for budget-conscious users. Loom Systems requires higher upfront investment, justified by its advanced AI features, offering significant ROI for innovation-focused organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed Icinga vs. Loom Systems Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Icinga vs. Loom Systems

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,948 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Icinga

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

48th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (41st), Server Monitoring (17th), Cloud Monitoring Software (32nd)

Loom Systems

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

65th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Anomaly Detection Tools (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Icinga is 1.4%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Loom Systems is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Icinga	1.4%
Loom Systems	0.5%
Other	98.1%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

reviewer2292201

Innovation Service Manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Easy to use, and it's possible to customize the product as per the needs we may have but average multi-tenancy aspect

It's supported by the community. We use Icinga, which is not part of the Open-Source platform but is wrapped into a commercial solution from another provider, a local provider in Italy. Icinga is an open-source platform, so it is supported by the community. It's quite easy to use, and it's possible to customize the product as per the needs we may have. So it's not expensive, and it's quite a general purpose. We can easily monitor any kind of infrastructure we encounter. The ability to customize scripts and build your own queries to request information from the infrastructure elements you want to monitor. This level of personalization and customization is highly appreciated. The alerting is the same as any other monitoring platform. It's not a "wow" feature that has changed our lives, but it's perfectly adequate.

Read full review

Keerthi Kumar Sangaraju

Technology Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Stable, easy to set up, flexible, and has multiple functionalities, but needs to define priority levels for each incident

What's lacking in Loom Systems is the level of priority for each incident. For example, after implementation and there was a huge impact on the client, and the client comes back to you and says that there's an incident, that there needs to be an immediate resolution for it, you'll see severity one, severity two, etc., in Loom Systems, rather than priority levels. It would be better if the incidents can be defined as low priority, medium priority, or high priority.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The value of Icinga is that it has hundreds of plugins, so it's really easy to monitor pretty much anything."

"I would recommend Icinga; it's an open-source solution, it's quite easy and simple to use, and checks can be run with Python code and Shell Script code."

"This solution has a self-healing handler where if the service is down, it is automatically restarted."

"Icinga2 was designed to delegate, distribute and balance tasks between several nodes."

"We monitor all, starting from UPS to international mail chains."

"Icinga has multiple automation and integration features. There is an API for everything and a web UI for configurations. The APIs enable you to automate tasks in Icinga. We can also use plugins to talk to the API. The Icinga Director talks to a database in the background, and you can import settings from the CMDB to all systems in Icinga."

"The best thing about the solution is how it highlights errors, the issues, and what needs my attention. The solution directs me to areas that I should look for first."

"People should know that it is simple and advanced."

More Icinga pros

"The solution is absolutely scalable."

"What I like best about Loom Systems is that you can use it for infrastructure monitoring. I also like that it's a flexible solution."

"The solution is absolutely scalable. If an organization needs to expand it out they definitely can."

"The RFS portion of the solution is the product's most valuable feature."

"Bringing Loom in ensures that the incident process, request process, change, all of these processes are improved."

"You can develop your own apps within Loom, and they can be configured very simply."

"The solution is very scalable; a company wouldn't have any issues expanding it if they needed to, and we have a few thousand users on the solution."

Cons

"One thing that Icinga lacks is the capability to create advanced and customized dashboards within the tool itself."

"Icinga’s automation could be improved."

"The solution lacks many features important to higher-level IT management and network support."

"The tool currently fails to provide notifications to users."

"The installation and configuration are very complex."

"The user interface should be improved."

"In general, the product does not look good. However, it does what it is supposed to do. So, the improvements should focus on usability and UI."

"We have found some problems with Nagios, and support isn't very responsive."

More Icinga cons

"What's lacking in Loom Systems is the level of priority for each incident. For example, after implementation and there was a huge impact on the client, and the client comes back to you and says that there's an incident, that there needs to be an immediate resolution for it, you'll see severity one, severity two, etc., in Loom Systems, rather than priority levels. It would be better if the incidents can be defined as low priority, medium priority, or high priority."

"The reporting is a bit weak. They should work to improve this aspect of the product."

"The change management within the solution needs to be improved. There needs to be more process automation."

"The discovery and mapping still takes a lot of human intervention, it's quite resource heavy, especially in the initial setup which can take six months of work, especially when you have a large estate that you're dealing with."

"The reporting is a bit weak."

"What's lacking in Loom Systems is the level of priority for each incident."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Even though Icinga's financial cost is low, it is an expensive product regarding the resources required to maintain and operate it."

"The product is inexpensive compared to other DBM products."

"It is cost-effective, and the return on investment can be very interesting because the price is low."

"This is an open-source solution with paid support."

"The solution is cheap."

"We're using the free version of Icinga."

"The solution is free to use."

"It's an open-source solution."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,948 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

14%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

University

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	8

No data available

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Icinga

Compared 9% of the time

Checkmk vs Icinga

Compared 6% of the time

Nagios XI vs Icinga

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs Icinga

Compared 4% of the time

Nagios Core vs Icinga

Compared 4% of the time

More Icinga Competitors

Splunk Observability Cloud vs Loom Systems

Compared 15% of the time

Moogsoft vs Loom Systems

Compared 12% of the time

OpsRamp vs Loom Systems

Compared 9% of the time

BigPanda vs Loom Systems

Compared 8% of the time

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs Loom Systems

Compared 7% of the time

More Loom Systems Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Icinga

August 2026

Download Icinga product report

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

July 2026

Download Loom Systems product report

Also Known As

Icinga Cloud Monitoring

No data available

Overview

Icinga is a robust tool for monitoring IT infrastructure, known for its distributed monitoring capabilities and seamless integration with multiple platforms. It efficiently observes servers, network devices, and environments like Linux and Windows, enabling proactive issue identification and resource management.

With a focus on task delegation and clustering, Icinga offers an intuitive interface through its GUI and Icinga Director, simplifying configuration. The extensive plugin library supports diverse technologies, while the API allows automation with tools like Terraform and Ansible. Despite its strengths, users report challenges with data display in the GUI, a need for improved dashboards, and complex configuration processes. Users benefit from its SNMP alerts, email notifications, and automated incident handling, making it essential for managed service environments and enterprises.

What are the key features of Icinga?

Task Delegation: Streamlines monitoring tasks across distributed systems.
Event Handler: Enables automatic service recovery with minimal intervention.
Plugin Library: Offers extensive support for integrating diverse technologies.
API Accessibility: Facilitates automation with popular tools like Terraform.
Custom Plugins: Allows easy creation and personalization for monitoring needs.

What benefits should you consider in Icinga reviews?

Flexibility: Tailors monitoring to specific requirements with community support.
Scalability: Successfully manages growing infrastructure demands.
Proactivity: Enhances issue identification and resource allocation.
Integration: Seamlessly works with existing IT operations platforms.

Icinga is widely adopted in IT environments for monitoring servers, networks, and applications across industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology. Its ability to integrate with various operating systems and automation platforms makes it a versatile choice for industries prioritizing comprehensive surveillance and proactive management of their infrastructure.

Icinga

Loom Systems is recognized for its flexibility in RFS and infrastructure monitoring, catering to IT service management. It aids in app creation and configuration, particularly useful for incident management and service desk operations.

Offering user-friendly functionality throughout the software development lifecycle, Loom Systems is valued for its adaptable capabilities in creating tailored implementations. While features like change and configuration management can be challenging, Loom Systems still stands out for its ease of use. Its platform, though resource-intensive initially, integrates with other tools, supporting IT challenges like automation and root cause analysis.

What are the key features of Loom Systems?

RFS Flexibility: Provides adaptable RFS options tailored to varied monitoring needs.
Infrastructure Monitoring: Allows comprehensive monitoring of IT infrastructure.
App Creation Platform: Facilitates easy development of customized applications.
Change Management: Though challenging, its management capabilities are integral.
Integration Capabilities: Supports integration with existing tools for seamless operation.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Enhanced IT Service Management: Facilitates efficient management of incident requests and problem resolution.
Versatile Use Cases: Supports diverse functions from asset management to security and HR modules.
Automation and Ease of Use: Simplifies deployment and migration processes while enabling automation.
Adaptable Implementations: Offers flexibility for custom solutions catering to enterprise needs.
Scalability: Suitable for medium to large enterprises with support for expansion.

In specific industries, Loom Systems is deployed predominantly for IT service management, asset management, and incident management. Medium to large enterprises use it for tasks such as implementation and automation, with additional security and HR capabilities. While smaller enterprises might consider cost, its robust features make it a preferred choice for IT tasks.

ServiceNow

Sample Customers

Puppet Labs, Audi, Spacex, Debian, Snapdeal, McGill, RIPE Network Coordination Centre

Citrix, Amdocs, Sysaid, Hexaware, Effibar, Revtrak, Taptica

Buyer's Guide

Icinga vs. Loom Systems

August 2026

Free Report: Icinga vs. Loom Systems

Find out what your peers are saying about Icinga vs. Loom Systems and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,948 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Icinga vs. Loom Systems report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.