IBM WebSphere Integration Developer vs JBoss Enterprise Application Platform comparison

IBM and Red Hat are both solutions in the Application Infrastructure category. IBM is ranked #34, while Red Hat is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.7. IBM holds a 0.3% mindshare in AIS, compared to Red Hat’s 8.7% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Red Hat users are willing to recommend the solution.

IBM WebSphere Integration D...

92 Views
60 Comparison Views

JBoss Enterprise Applicatio...

Read 7 JBoss Enterprise Application Platform reviews

1,181 Views
1,181 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

IBM WebSphere Integration D...

JBoss Enterprise Applicatio...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM WebSphere Integration Developer and JBoss Enterprise Application Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, F5 and others in Application Infrastructure.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Infrastructure Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Application Infrastructure

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 862,499 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM WebSphere Integration D...

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

34th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

JBoss Enterprise Applicatio...

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

10th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Application Infrastructure category, the mindshare of IBM WebSphere Integration Developer is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is 8.7%, up from 7.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Infrastructure

Featured Reviews

Use IBM WebSphere Integration Developer?

Share your opinion

Gustavo Magni

lead architect at Sys Manager

Stable solution with an easy initial setup process

We use the solution for the deployment of Java-based applications The solution helps my organization with simple and fast deployments. The solution is easy to configure and deploy. The solution's architecture needs improvement. Also, there could be more integration with container platforms. We…

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

862,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

32%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about JBoss Enterprise Application Platform?

The solution is quite stable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with JBoss Enterprise Application Platform?

In my experience, it is more beneficial to embed all that into Kubernetes ( /products/kubernetes-reviews ) today. This approach makes it easier to develop, deploy, and administer applications.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for JBoss Enterprise Application Platform?

I use JBoss Enterprise Application Platform ( /products/jboss-enterprise-application-platform-reviews ) for all our web applications, both internal and external.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

IBM WebSphere Application Server vs JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

Compared 80% of the time

Microsoft .NET Framework vs JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

Compared 7% of the time

NGINX Plus vs JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

Compared 4% of the time

IBM BPM vs JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Apache Web Server vs JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Infrastructure

July 2025

IBM WebSphere Integration Developer report

Download IBM WebSphere Integration Developer product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Infrastructure

July 2025

JBoss Enterprise Application Platform report

Download JBoss Enterprise Application Platform product report

Also Known As

WebSphere Integration Developer

JBoss EAP, Red Hat EAP

Overview

WebSphere Integration Developer (WID) is an integrated development environment for building applications based on service-oriented architecture (SOA).

IBM

Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (JBoss EAP) is an open source platform for modern Java applications deployed in any environment. JBoss EAPâs architecture is modular, and cloud ready. The platform offers powerful management and automation for greater developer productivity. It is based on the open source Wildfly project (formerly known as JBoss Application Server).

Red Hat

Sample Customers

The City of Edinburgh Council, Factor-y S.r.l., Alleyoop Inc., Dow Chemical Company, Airbus, Wittmann EDV-Systeme, The Chevrolet Volt, Federal Employment Agency, Web Business Consulting, Rosenthal & Rosenthal

APD, Banco Azteca, Roche, Tata Sky, Frost Bank

Buyer's Guide

Application Infrastructure

July 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, F5 and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

862,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.