IBM WebSphere BPMS vs Nintex Process Platform comparison

IBM and Nintex are both solutions in the Process Automation category. IBM is ranked #27 with an average rating of 8.5, while Nintex is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0. IBM holds a 0.3% mindshare in PA, compared to Nintex’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Nintex users who would recommend it.

IBM WebSphere BPMS

Read 6 IBM WebSphere BPMS reviews

243 Views
243 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Nintex Process Platform

Read 24 Nintex Process Platform reviews

2,379 Views
1,237 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

IBM WebSphere BPMS

Nintex Process Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

IBM WebSphere BPMS and Nintex Process Platform compete in business process management and automation, with Nintex often perceived as superior due to its feature-rich offerings and user-friendly approach.

Features: IBM WebSphere BPMS excels in handling complex business processes, robust integration, and advanced support for enterprise-level operations. Nintex Process Platform is notable for its user-friendliness, adaptability, and comprehensive automation and workflow tools that support a wide range of business needs.

Room for Improvement: IBM WebSphere BPMS could improve its ease of deployment and lower setup costs. Users often find the configuration process complex and cumbersome. Nintex Process Platform can enhance its scalability and integration with non-Microsoft products. Some users also suggest improvements in flexibility when handling extremely large datasets and workflows.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM WebSphere BPMS requires significant expertise for installation and configuration but offers robust customer support to address complex issues. Nintex Process Platform allows for quicker deployment with an intuitive setup process and is supported by responsive customer service, streamlining the experience for users.

Pricing and ROI: IBM WebSphere BPMS involves higher initial costs which can be justified by large enterprises with specific integration needs, aiming for substantial ROI in those scenarios. Nintex Process Platform offers a more competitive pricing model with lower upfront expenses, resulting in faster ROI, especially appealing for cost-conscious organizations seeking efficiency in process automation.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM WebSphere BPMS vs. Nintex Process Platform Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM WebSphere BPMS vs. Nintex Process Platform

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM WebSphere BPMS

Ranking in Process Automation

27th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Nintex Process Platform

Ranking in Process Automation

9th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (12th), Workload Automation (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of IBM WebSphere BPMS is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nintex Process Platform is 1.9%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Nintex Process Platform	1.9%
IBM WebSphere BPMS	0.3%
Other	97.8%

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

ChandraBollini

Software Engineer at Wipro Technologies

Developers gain flexibility to build custom controls with numerous integration options

Looking forward, IBM WebSphere BPMS could add more adapters to integrate with SAP or Salesforce integrator in upcoming releases. Regarding AI-driven process optimizations, we have not implemented these features with IBM WebSphere BPMS. In recent versions, IBM has introduced some generative AI features, and we plan to migrate to the newer versions within approximately one year.

Read full review

Satya Singh

Human Resource Executive at MetLife

Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability

Nintex is still at the starting point of integrating with AI. It has integrated with a very small piece of artificial intelligence., like only integrated with the Google Cloud. There is a benefit, like a no-code and low-code solution. But, again, if you are a developer, especially if you are a hardcore developer, you are using your code knowledge, its skills, and all. And, suddenly, you are moving into the low-code solution, and then you will feel, like, so many things you can't achieve with the low-code solution. And in that case, you are looking for some custom development. And it's a little bit difficult in the Nintex area. Because they are totally dependent on the low-code solution, and you are looking at where you can implement your custom things. However, you can do that thing, but that will be a difficult task. Also, the outcome, whatever you are trying to get from such kind of custom development, will be a little bit difficult. Let's suppose, like, if you are working with a medium level of data or a small level of data that will be easier to handle with the Nintex. However, the bulk data on a high level of data would be difficult. I have been working with Nintex for the past three years. I've been able to create some really good products in different domains, including banking and insurance. Everything seems achievable, but there are a few things I'm missing. First, debugging can be a bit difficult in Nintex. You can't debug forms and workflows easily. This is something that could be improved in future releases. It requires some R&D. Second, I would like to see more integration with AI. There is some custom integration available through the gateway, but it would be great to have more AI-related features built into the platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The UI capabilities of the solution are great. The speed of delivery is good."

"The most valuable feature of IBM WebSphere BPMS is the systematic framework it provides for building different systems."

"IBM WebSphere BPMS provides significant return on investments, especially in the BAW component."

"This product is flexible in its ability to integrate processes and it can be extended and integrated with other software."

"We like the feature in which we can trace back instances."

"It's easy to learn. However, there is very little content available for the Nintex also, but they are providing their own documentation and all. So, it's easy to learn also."

"It saves time as tasks are automated."

"This tool is really helpful in reducing a lot of manual work. Its drag and drop components help to create a workflow faster than SharePoint Workflow Designer."

"Out of box connectivity with UiPath."

"Provides the ability to automate SharePoint processes (building sites, lists, updating content). You can also automate document and content processes, onboarding and offboarding, and general IT and HR solutions."

"It is very easy to create and deploy. I am very happy with how user-friendly Nintex Workflow is."

"It is very easy to use events. K2 has useful tools."

"I like the feature of getting an email for a workflow error, then I do not have to go through every instance."

More Nintex Process Platform pros

Cons

"There is a need for more capabilities in low-code and no-code development to increase efficiency and make implementation simpler."

"The solution lacks acceptable stability."

"Looking forward, IBM WebSphere BPMS could add more adapters to integrate with SAP or Salesforce integrator in upcoming releases."

"Sometimes there are tasks that failed without any reason."

"The user interface could be improved, and although integration opportunities are good, they could be improved further."

"K2's support for DevOp team corporations is weak."

"We'd like to have integration with SharePoint."

"The license pricing is too high currently for Nintex Workflow."

"There is room for improvement in the user experience in the forms."

"The licensing needs to be improved. Right now, we find it's getting more expensive to use the product."

"User interface could use some improvement. Perhaps integration with Visual Studio or SharePoint Designer would be useful."

"We would like to have access to an on-premises solution. In our country, we have a relationship with Central Bank of Egypt, which do noes not allow cloud solutions to be used. They should offer an on-prem solution with a flexible price license."

"Unfortunately, Nintex Workflow is not that stable. We are looking at shifting to another tool."

More Nintex Process Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Our maintenance costs are reduced."

"This solution is affordable and is cheaper than most alternatives on the market. We have a standard cloud license that costs about 20k per year."

"We pay on a yearly basis. It's my understanding that we pay approximately $11,000/year."

"Nintex is around INR 200 per license in India, which is much cheaper. Smaller organizations are always looking for cost-effective solutions, and Nintex provides local solutions with very low pricing."

"For the initial hundred users, the cost is $21,000 per year, which I find too high."

"Certainly. Notably, in terms of cost, this solution presents a substantial advantage, being approximately forty percent more economical compared to Oracle. It offers flexibility with two deployment options, catering to both cloud and on-premises preferences. Moreover, within each deployment option, there are two variations available. For organizations with limited IT resources and relying on citizen developers—individuals from the business side comfortable with technology—the platform allows for a more hands-on approach. These users can independently implement solutions without extensive coding or custom development. In contrast, the KQ solution at Symantec is adept at addressing the needs of sectors like banking, where extensive custom development is required for seamless integration with existing applications, websites, and ensuring robust security measures."

"Offering a licensing model that allows for multiple small workflows would be a huge improvement to an already great platform."

"Nintex products are expensive, but valuable. Licensing in on-premise was historically based on a perpetual model, where you’d license per Web front-end. However, they are switching exclusively to a consumption (subscription) model, where you purchase the number of workflows you think you’ll use in your environment, and can scale up from there."

More Nintex Process Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with IBM WebSphere BPMS?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM WebSphere BPMS?

IBM WebSphere BPMS allows users to build workflows and dashboards. It is a developer-friendly product. The product features a great UI interface that is mobile-friendly, tab-friendly, and desktop-f...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering IBM WebSphere BPMS?

Understanding the benefits and improvements that come with using the product is essential. IBM WebSphere BPMS is performing excellently, and I do not see any significant areas requiring improvement...

See all answers

What do you like most about K2?

The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for K2?

Nintex Process Platform is expensive. Prices relate to both features and the professional services necessary due to our lack of an implementation team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with K2?

The user interface in Nintex needs improvement. It is not very intuitive and requires changes. Additionally, the deployment process should be easier.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Camunda vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 14% of the time

Pega Platform vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 8% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Ivanti Automation vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Bizagi vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 6% of the time

More Nintex Process Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM WebSphere BPMS

September 2025

Download IBM WebSphere BPMS product report

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform

September 2025

Download Nintex Process Platform product report

Also Known As

WebSphere BPMS

K2 blackpearl, K2 Five, Nintex Workflow

Overview

Information not available

IBM

Nintex Process Platform offers no/low-code development with system integrations and efficient workflow management, ideal for complex business processes. It's known for its scalable workflows, data management through SmartObjects, and a user-friendly visual designer.

Nintex Process Platform enables organizations to automate processes with ease, supporting electronic forms, digital transformation, and seamless department collaboration. Users on SharePoint and other integrated systems leverage its extensive workflow capabilities for approvals, onboarding, and information capture. While its current framework might benefit from performance enhancements and improved management console usability, it remains a strong choice for providing scalable solutions across industries.

What are the key features of Nintex Process Platform?

No/Low-Code Development: Enables users to develop applications without extensive coding knowledge, simplifying process creation.
System Integration: Offers seamless integration with systems like SharePoint and SAP, enhancing operational efficiency.
Workflow Capability: Facilitates the creation of sophisticated workflows suitable for complex processes.
SmartObjects: Centralizes data management, ensuring streamlined data access and usability.
Visual Designer: Simplifies the design and execution of business processes with an intuitive interface.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Increased Efficiency: Rapid deployment minimizes downtime and accelerates process automation.
Cost Savings: Reduces time spent on manual processes, improving operational costs.
Enhanced Collaboration: Streamlines communication and coordination across departments, leading to better teamwork.
Time Savings: Speeds up routine tasks like approvals and onboarding, freeing up resources for strategic initiatives.

Companies in sectors like government, HR, and financial services implement Nintex Process Platform for its ability to streamline and connect internal processes. It supports approval workflows, notifications, and data capturing, proving its versatility for diverse business needs. However, challenges with document conversion, performance, and cloud feature parity suggest room for enhancements, particularly in industries handling complex workflows.

Nintex

Sample Customers

Schahin Group, Korean Credit Card Company, Versicherungskammer Bayern, Biogrid Australia

SEA Corp, Omnicom Group, Verizon, STIHL

Buyer's Guide

IBM WebSphere BPMS vs. Nintex Process Platform

September 2025

Free Report: IBM WebSphere BPMS vs. Nintex Process Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM WebSphere BPMS vs. Nintex Process Platform and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM WebSphere BPMS vs. Nintex Process Platform report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.