IBM WebSphere BPMS vs Nintex Process Platform comparison

IBM and Nintex are both solutions in the Process Automation category. IBM is ranked #33 with an average rating of 7.0, while Nintex is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.3. IBM holds a 0.2% mindshare in PA, compared to Nintex’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Nintex users who would recommend it.

IBM WebSphere BPMS

Read 5 IBM WebSphere BPMS reviews

146 Views
68 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Nintex Process Platform

Read 24 Nintex Process Platform reviews

1,771 Views
1,052 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

IBM WebSphere BPMS

Nintex Process Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

IBM WebSphere BPMS and Nintex Process Platform compete in business process management and automation, with Nintex often perceived as superior due to its feature-rich offerings and user-friendly approach.

Features: IBM WebSphere BPMS excels in handling complex business processes, robust integration, and advanced support for enterprise-level operations. Nintex Process Platform is notable for its user-friendliness, adaptability, and comprehensive automation and workflow tools that support a wide range of business needs.

Room for Improvement: IBM WebSphere BPMS could improve its ease of deployment and lower setup costs. Users often find the configuration process complex and cumbersome. Nintex Process Platform can enhance its scalability and integration with non-Microsoft products. Some users also suggest improvements in flexibility when handling extremely large datasets and workflows.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM WebSphere BPMS requires significant expertise for installation and configuration but offers robust customer support to address complex issues. Nintex Process Platform allows for quicker deployment with an intuitive setup process and is supported by responsive customer service, streamlining the experience for users.

Pricing and ROI: IBM WebSphere BPMS involves higher initial costs which can be justified by large enterprises with specific integration needs, aiming for substantial ROI in those scenarios. Nintex Process Platform offers a more competitive pricing model with lower upfront expenses, resulting in faster ROI, especially appealing for cost-conscious organizations seeking efficiency in process automation.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM WebSphere BPMS vs. Nintex Process Platform Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM WebSphere BPMS vs. Nintex Process Platform

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM WebSphere BPMS

Ranking in Process Automation

33rd

Average Rating

6.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Nintex Process Platform

Ranking in Process Automation

9th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (10th), Workload Automation (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of IBM WebSphere BPMS is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nintex Process Platform is 2.0%, down from 3.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Samuel Tsang

Senior Project Manager at Bank Of China(Hong Kong) Limited

Systematic role management and flexible integration improve efficiency, but low-code capabilities and setup complexity need addressing

The most valuable feature of IBM WebSphere BPMS ( /products/ibm-websphere-bpms-reviews ) is the systematic framework it provides for building different systems. The critical component is the authorization within the workflow assignment, which is an attractive aspect of this tool. It has helped us in systematic role management within the workflow. Additionally, it offers flexible integration capabilities facilitating front-end and back-end separation practices, allowing for technologies like Angular and Spring Boot ( /products/spring-boot-reviews ).

Read full review

Damilola Adeleye

Business Automation Developer at Polaris Bank Nigeria Plc

Straightforward interface and user-friendly

There are a lot of apps in K2, but what I really found that needs improvement is the management section of K2, especially the management server and the admin page where you can manage processes, add users, set security fees, and add licenses. The reason for this is because the part that is the section of administration, particularly the management called rows, has multiple rules, as many as you want. For instance, you may have around 200 rules, and when you view them, only the first ten are displayed, and you have to click next to see the next ten and so on until you get to the hundredth rule. On that page, as of today, we only have what we call to fetch, where you can search for a particular rule you're looking for, or else you have to keep clicking until you get to the final page you want. So that's a bit challenging.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We like the feature in which we can trace back instances."

"The UI capabilities of the solution are great. The speed of delivery is good."

"This product is flexible in its ability to integrate processes and it can be extended and integrated with other software."

"The most valuable feature of IBM WebSphere BPMS is the systematic framework it provides for building different systems."

"Our solutions using Nintex has been most successful in automating HR processes because it allows you to easily and rapidly build solutions that conform to the unique business processes for each entity."

"It creates workflows to handle business processes. It allows us to route approvals to users without human intervention."

"It is very easy to use."

"This solution is very easy to use and customize, using almost zero coding. It's built on SharePoint which many companies in our country have experience with. This made it easy to adapt the application in our environment."

"K2's best feature is that it can solve complex tasks, issues, and projects with little coding."

"The technical support provided by Nintex is very helpful."

"It is a scalable product."

"The setup is easy."

More Nintex Process Platform pros

Cons

"The user interface could be improved, and although integration opportunities are good, they could be improved further."

"The solution lacks acceptable stability."

"Sometimes there are tasks that failed without any reason."

"There is a need for more capabilities in low-code and no-code development to increase efficiency and make implementation simpler."

"We cannot use the same solution on cloud."

"Difficult to include external partners with the solution deployed on-premise."

"Unfortunately, Nintex Workflow is not that stable. We are looking at shifting to another tool."

"The licensing needs to be improved. Right now, we find it's getting more expensive to use the product."

"The product’s support for the mobile platform and its ability to handle artificial loads could be better."

"Currently, a notable challenge lies in the alignment of user experiences across the eight or nine applications within the suite. Transitioning between applications can be somewhat cumbersome due to varying user interfaces. However, the provider is actively addressing this concern by consistently rolling out updates every four to five months, aimed at harmonizing and streamlining the interfaces. This ongoing effort is expected to enhance the user experience over time. In terms of functionality and features, the platform stands out, offering flexibility with the option for both on-premises and cloud deployment. This flexibility extends to the RPA tool, providing clients with choices tailored to their preferences. An advantage lies in the shared security and data infrastructure across the toolset, facilitating smooth data transfer between applications. This contrasts with experiences with Oracle, where data transfer may involve complexities such as the need for intermediary file formats like TXL or SCZ."

"The management server and the admin page where you can manage processes need improvement."

"Nintex seems to be very server intensive. It is one of the reasons that we are moving to a different product on the SharePoint 2016 platform."

More Nintex Process Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It's more suited for enterprise level, not for small or medium-sized businesses (SMBs)."

"There is an initial fee when purchasing and a fee for maintenance afterward."

"Nintex Workflow is more expensive than Microsoft's native products, but it is still considered moderately priced when compared to higher-end products such as K2."

"This solution is affordable and is cheaper than most alternatives on the market. We have a standard cloud license that costs about 20k per year."

"The product’s price is competitive compared to other vendors."

"For the initial hundred users, the cost is $21,000 per year, which I find too high."

"The initial investment in K2 is heavy. Currently, the expenditure is $28,000 for a year. After we go to the cloud, it is going to be per seat and probably cheaper. Currently, there are unlimited users."

"Certainly. Notably, in terms of cost, this solution presents a substantial advantage, being approximately forty percent more economical compared to Oracle. It offers flexibility with two deployment options, catering to both cloud and on-premises preferences. Moreover, within each deployment option, there are two variations available. For organizations with limited IT resources and relying on citizen developers—individuals from the business side comfortable with technology—the platform allows for a more hands-on approach. These users can independently implement solutions without extensive coding or custom development. In contrast, the KQ solution at Symantec is adept at addressing the needs of sectors like banking, where extensive custom development is required for seamless integration with existing applications, websites, and ensuring robust security measures."

More Nintex Process Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

18%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with IBM WebSphere BPMS?

There is a need for more capabilities in low-code and no-code development to increase efficiency and make implementation simpler. The tool currently involves a complex setup requirement, and having...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM WebSphere BPMS?

We use IBM WebSphere BPMS ( /products/ibm-websphere-bpms-reviews ) internally in the bank for process automation and management. Our IT department self-builds different systems to serve various use...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering IBM WebSphere BPMS?

I recommend IBM WebSphere BPMS for large enterprises concerned with total system management. It is not ideal for SMB due to its complexity and the need for significant IT resources. I rate it seven...

See all answers

What do you like most about K2?

The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for K2?

Nintex Process Platform is expensive. Prices relate to both features and the professional services necessary due to our lack of an implementation team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with K2?

The user interface in Nintex needs improvement. It is not very intuitive and requires changes. Additionally, the deployment process should be easier.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Camunda vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 21% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Pega Platform vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Bizagi vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Appian vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Nintex Process Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM WebSphere BPMS

April 2025

Download IBM WebSphere BPMS product report

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform

April 2025

Download Nintex Process Platform product report

Also Known As

WebSphere BPMS

K2 blackpearl, K2 Five, Nintex Workflow

Overview

Information not available

IBM

Nintex Process Platform automates processes such as approvals, vendor requests, and leave management, optimizing workflows in sectors like government, banking, and HR.

Nintex Process Platform streamlines collaboration and integrates seamlessly with Microsoft tools. It supports account management, loan origination, claims reimbursement, and public e-services, while also assisting with onboarding, resource management, and compliance workflows. Users benefit from its ease of maintenance, low-code development, and powerful workflow engine capable of handling complex processes through SmartObjects technology.

What are some key features?

Easy Maintenance - Simplifies ongoing management and updates.
Low-Code Development - Enables quick application creation with minimal coding.
Extensive Integration - Connects with diverse data sources through SmartObjects technology.
Drag-and-Drop Interface - Offers a user-friendly, visually intuitive design for creating workflows.
Automatic Workflow Triggers - Allows for seamless automation of predefined actions.
Integration with Microsoft Ecosystems - Ensures compatibility with SharePoint and Office 365.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Affordability - Offers cost-effective solutions for businesses.
Customizability - Provides tailored solutions that meet specific needs.
Support - Beneficial for addressing issues and optimizing performance.
Rapid Development - Facilitates quick project turnaround due to its pre-built constructs.

Nintex Process Platform is implemented across various sectors, such as government, banking, and HR, providing significant improvements in workflow efficiency. In governmental agencies, it facilitates public e-services and compliance workflows, while in banking, it supports account management and loan origination. HR departments benefit from enhanced onboarding, resource management, and leave management processes.

Nintex

Sample Customers

Schahin Group, Korean Credit Card Company, Versicherungskammer Bayern, Biogrid Australia

SEA Corp, Omnicom Group, Verizon, STIHL

Buyer's Guide

IBM WebSphere BPMS vs. Nintex Process Platform

April 2025

Free Report: IBM WebSphere BPMS vs. Nintex Process Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM WebSphere BPMS vs. Nintex Process Platform and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM WebSphere BPMS vs. Nintex Process Platform report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.