IBM WebSphere BPMS vs Nintex Process Platform comparison

IBM and Nintex are both solutions in the Process Automation category. IBM is ranked #33 with an average rating of 7.0, while Nintex is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.0. IBM holds a 0.2% mindshare in PA, compared to Nintex’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Nintex users who would recommend it.

IBM WebSphere BPMS

Read 6 IBM WebSphere BPMS reviews

172 Views
39 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Nintex Process Platform

Read 24 Nintex Process Platform reviews

1,525 Views
241 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

IBM WebSphere BPMS

Nintex Process Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

IBM WebSphere BPMS and Nintex Process Platform compete in business process management and automation, with Nintex often perceived as superior due to its feature-rich offerings and user-friendly approach.

Features: IBM WebSphere BPMS excels in handling complex business processes, robust integration, and advanced support for enterprise-level operations. Nintex Process Platform is notable for its user-friendliness, adaptability, and comprehensive automation and workflow tools that support a wide range of business needs.

Room for Improvement: IBM WebSphere BPMS could improve its ease of deployment and lower setup costs. Users often find the configuration process complex and cumbersome. Nintex Process Platform can enhance its scalability and integration with non-Microsoft products. Some users also suggest improvements in flexibility when handling extremely large datasets and workflows.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM WebSphere BPMS requires significant expertise for installation and configuration but offers robust customer support to address complex issues. Nintex Process Platform allows for quicker deployment with an intuitive setup process and is supported by responsive customer service, streamlining the experience for users.

Pricing and ROI: IBM WebSphere BPMS involves higher initial costs which can be justified by large enterprises with specific integration needs, aiming for substantial ROI in those scenarios. Nintex Process Platform offers a more competitive pricing model with lower upfront expenses, resulting in faster ROI, especially appealing for cost-conscious organizations seeking efficiency in process automation.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM WebSphere BPMS vs. Nintex Process Platform Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM WebSphere BPMS vs. Nintex Process Platform

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM WebSphere BPMS

Ranking in Process Automation

33rd

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Nintex Process Platform

Ranking in Process Automation

11th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (13th), Workload Automation (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of IBM WebSphere BPMS is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nintex Process Platform is 1.8%, down from 3.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Samuel Tsang

Senior Project Manager at Bank Of China(Hong Kong) Limited

Systematic role management and flexible integration improve efficiency, but low-code capabilities and setup complexity need addressing

The most valuable feature of IBM WebSphere BPMS ( /products/ibm-websphere-bpms-reviews ) is the systematic framework it provides for building different systems. The critical component is the authorization within the workflow assignment, which is an attractive aspect of this tool. It has helped us in systematic role management within the workflow. Additionally, it offers flexible integration capabilities facilitating front-end and back-end separation practices, allowing for technologies like Angular and Spring Boot ( /products/spring-boot-reviews ).

Read full review

Vitor Medeiros

National Sales Director at Konica Minolta

Offers capacity to integrate with external platforms but technically difficult

There is room for improvement in the user experience in the forms. When we need to develop the forms, we don't have much customization, and I think we need more flexibility there. It's technically difficult, but it would be great to be able to develop our own code and integrate it into the platform. We could then run our own code for specific actions and requests or even develop a page or form. So, if I can ask Nintex for something, it would be a way to integrate our own code for specific actions. When it comes to integration, it could have more options for custom requests.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of IBM WebSphere BPMS is the systematic framework it provides for building different systems."

"We like the feature in which we can trace back instances."

"This product is flexible in its ability to integrate processes and it can be extended and integrated with other software."

"The UI capabilities of the solution are great. The speed of delivery is good."

"IBM WebSphere BPMS provides significant return on investments, especially in the BAW component."

"Our solutions using Nintex has been most successful in automating HR processes because it allows you to easily and rapidly build solutions that conform to the unique business processes for each entity."

"Out of box connectivity with UiPath."

"I really like the visual representation. It actually looks like a flow chart, which is nicer than a SharePoint Designer workflow, which doesn't have that ability."

"The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform."

"It saves time as tasks are automated."

"It has helped us a lot, especially during the initial phase of a project where most of the things are done on paper."

"K2's best feature is that it can solve complex tasks, issues, and projects with little coding."

"The SharePoint feature is a really good connection, there are many features that are good."

More Nintex Process Platform pros

Cons

"The solution lacks acceptable stability."

"Looking forward, IBM WebSphere BPMS could add more adapters to integrate with SAP or Salesforce integrator in upcoming releases."

"Sometimes there are tasks that failed without any reason."

"There is a need for more capabilities in low-code and no-code development to increase efficiency and make implementation simpler."

"The user interface could be improved, and although integration opportunities are good, they could be improved further."

"It's very tedious to manage."

"The cost of the solution is high and has room for improvement."

"Heavy, cumbersome and inflexible."

"I would also like to see the BPM features from Pega implemented, that have to do with the implementation of AI, and the robotics."

"K2 is a workflow solution, and there is no RPA solution with K2. This is where K2 lacks a little bit. It is just a heavy workflow solution. It doesn't have a supplemental product like RPA. If you want to use RPA, you have to use Blue Prism, UIPath, or something else. If you use Nintex, it has an RPA solution. It is a form-based application, and they are doing everything electronically. The initial investment in K2 is heavy because it is a BPM software. It does not have a low cost because they charge you the same for one workflow or 100 workflows."

"The product’s support for the mobile platform and its ability to handle artificial loads could be better."

"The solution needs more RPA and AI features."

"Currently, copying workflow actions from one workflow to another is not possible. Also, the Office 365 solution is not as mature as on-premise."

More Nintex Process Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Offering a licensing model that allows for multiple small workflows would be a huge improvement to an already great platform."

"The enterprise version has some additional features that I would like to use, but the price is not fair."

"We pay on a yearly basis. It's my understanding that we pay approximately $11,000/year."

"Prices for licenses of K2 are high."

"Nintex products are expensive, but valuable. Licensing in on-premise was historically based on a perpetual model, where you’d license per Web front-end. However, they are switching exclusively to a consumption (subscription) model, where you purchase the number of workflows you think you’ll use in your environment, and can scale up from there."

"Certainly. Notably, in terms of cost, this solution presents a substantial advantage, being approximately forty percent more economical compared to Oracle. It offers flexibility with two deployment options, catering to both cloud and on-premises preferences. Moreover, within each deployment option, there are two variations available. For organizations with limited IT resources and relying on citizen developers—individuals from the business side comfortable with technology—the platform allows for a more hands-on approach. These users can independently implement solutions without extensive coding or custom development. In contrast, the KQ solution at Symantec is adept at addressing the needs of sectors like banking, where extensive custom development is required for seamless integration with existing applications, websites, and ensuring robust security measures."

"Our maintenance costs are reduced."

"Comparatively, it's expensive."

More Nintex Process Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

18%

Educational Organization

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with IBM WebSphere BPMS?

There is a need for more capabilities in low-code and no-code development to increase efficiency and make implementation simpler. The tool currently involves a complex setup requirement, and having...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM WebSphere BPMS?

We use IBM WebSphere BPMS ( /products/ibm-websphere-bpms-reviews ) internally in the bank for process automation and management. Our IT department self-builds different systems to serve various use...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering IBM WebSphere BPMS?

I recommend IBM WebSphere BPMS for large enterprises concerned with total system management. It is not ideal for SMB due to its complexity and the need for significant IT resources. I rate it seven...

See all answers

What do you like most about K2?

The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for K2?

Nintex Process Platform is expensive. Prices relate to both features and the professional services necessary due to our lack of an implementation team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with K2?

The user interface in Nintex needs improvement. It is not very intuitive and requires changes. Additionally, the deployment process should be easier.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Camunda vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 19% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Pega Platform vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Bizagi vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 6% of the time

AgilePoint vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Nintex Process Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM WebSphere BPMS

June 2025

Download IBM WebSphere BPMS product report

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform

June 2025

Download Nintex Process Platform product report

Also Known As

WebSphere BPMS

K2 blackpearl, K2 Five, Nintex Workflow

Overview

Information not available

IBM

Nintex Process Platform automates processes such as approvals, vendor requests, and leave management, optimizing workflows in sectors like government, banking, and HR.

Nintex Process Platform streamlines collaboration and integrates seamlessly with Microsoft tools. It supports account management, loan origination, claims reimbursement, and public e-services, while also assisting with onboarding, resource management, and compliance workflows. Users benefit from its ease of maintenance, low-code development, and powerful workflow engine capable of handling complex processes through SmartObjects technology.

What are some key features?

Easy Maintenance - Simplifies ongoing management and updates.
Low-Code Development - Enables quick application creation with minimal coding.
Extensive Integration - Connects with diverse data sources through SmartObjects technology.
Drag-and-Drop Interface - Offers a user-friendly, visually intuitive design for creating workflows.
Automatic Workflow Triggers - Allows for seamless automation of predefined actions.
Integration with Microsoft Ecosystems - Ensures compatibility with SharePoint and Office 365.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Affordability - Offers cost-effective solutions for businesses.
Customizability - Provides tailored solutions that meet specific needs.
Support - Beneficial for addressing issues and optimizing performance.
Rapid Development - Facilitates quick project turnaround due to its pre-built constructs.

Nintex Process Platform is implemented across various sectors, such as government, banking, and HR, providing significant improvements in workflow efficiency. In governmental agencies, it facilitates public e-services and compliance workflows, while in banking, it supports account management and loan origination. HR departments benefit from enhanced onboarding, resource management, and leave management processes.

Nintex

Sample Customers

Schahin Group, Korean Credit Card Company, Versicherungskammer Bayern, Biogrid Australia

SEA Corp, Omnicom Group, Verizon, STIHL

Buyer's Guide

IBM WebSphere BPMS vs. Nintex Process Platform

June 2025

Free Report: IBM WebSphere BPMS vs. Nintex Process Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM WebSphere BPMS vs. Nintex Process Platform and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM WebSphere BPMS vs. Nintex Process Platform report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.