IBM Tivoli OMEGAMON vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence comparison

IBM and Broadcom are both solutions in the Mainframe Management category. IBM is ranked #1, while Broadcom is ranked #7. IBM holds a 26.8% mindshare in MM, compared to Broadcom’s 2.9% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution.

IBM Tivoli OMEGAMON

Read 1 IBM Tivoli OMEGAMON review

954 Views
954 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...

Read 27 OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence reviews

459 Views
188 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

IBM Tivoli OMEGAMON

OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Tivoli OMEGAMON and OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Rocket Software, BMC and others in Mainframe Management.

To learn more, read our detailed OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 863,331 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Tivoli OMEGAMON

Ranking in Mainframe Management

1st

Average Rating

5.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...

Ranking in Mainframe Management

7th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Mainframe Management category, the mindshare of IBM Tivoli OMEGAMON is 26.8%, down from 27.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence is 2.9%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Mainframe Management

Featured Reviews

Peter Beylemans

Mainframe Support at AG Insurance

Good stability but it is lacking the ability to see historical information

We can only see online information but there isn't any historical data to see something that happened a few hours previous. We don't have the ability to access that information. Previously, with MainView, we could look back at information from two days before and get information. We could easily get information from Plexus. Now, we don't have a single screen to check which has been annoying. Compared to MainView, Tivoli is rubbish. We are forced to use this solution. We couldn't stay with MainView. I would like for it to be easier to check the system performance. It should have the ability to see historical data. We can't see the percentages to see the percentages of the CPU utilized. We should be able to see how much was used by our part of the system. Now, we have to continuously recalculate that information.

Read full review

Greg Payne

Sr. Analyst/Technology Infrastructure at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

It automates responses, preventing issues from becoming more severe

I just installed version 12.3, which actually already has a number of new features. It's going to make it easier for some of our new users. I'm old-school, I learned it the old way. I actually want to go back and implement it and start doing things the new way. As I need to train people, it's going to make it easier for them and make the learning curve much shorter. The new release addressed some shortcomings of the product. It was old-school. The learning curve was a little bit long in the beginning, but it's really come a long way.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's stable enough. I haven't noticed any problems since it was installed."

"The performance of it is beyond exceptional. It is probably one of the best products that I have ever worked with. It is easy to use, comprehensive, and can perform almost any task you need it to."

"It alerts the operators when it is time to repair the communications and the IPLs."

"With the automation pieces we can bring this region up or take this region down, and it allows us to always meet our time critical requirements."

"Their technical support is incredible, immediately responsive, and even if it is not updated to Level 2 support sometimes, they chip in providing more detailed answers and options to fix the problem."

"The follow-up surprised me. Making sure that I am happy with what I have gone to them on. They will call after I have made changes and verify that I am happy with the changes that I did have to make. If it did not fix the complete problem, they go back over it until I am satisfied."

"If something breaks and it goes down when it's not supposed to, automation brings it right back up."

"The documentation is simple, easy to follow, and use. A limited, first-time systems programmer can do it, in that it is out-of-the-box almost functional."

"It allows us to respond faster to issues. If there are issues that come out, we're able to capture a message and alert somebody about it."

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence pros

Cons

"We can't see the percentages to see the percentages of the CPU utilized. We should be able to see how much was used by our part of the system. Now, we have to continuously recalculate that information."

"Some of the command sequences are too long."

"Because of its age, it's a little bit difficult to modernize some of the integrations and some of the functions."

"It definitely needs more web-based interface, to be more mobile-open. More APIs, more open source to it."

"The interfaces to USS, CA UIM could be better. CA Common Services interfaces - namely Zdata Mover, Zmessage Service, Zdatacolletcor - are poorly documented."

"Performing a stop/restart of OPS/MVS could be a little smoother. Without special coding, some undesired tasks will be started and some necessary tasks will be stopped if we have to bounce OPS/MVS during the day."

"The reason sometimes it is not stable, we do not have the expertise to write the script."

"The GUI interface could be improved, but that is coming. They are working on that."

"Scalability is zero. It cannot be scaled because of its age."

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence cons

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mainframe Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

863,331 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

17%

Government

13%

Healthcare Company

10%

Logistics Company

20%

Educational Organization

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

BMC MainView vs IBM Tivoli OMEGAMON

Compared 33% of the time

ASG TMON vs IBM Tivoli OMEGAMON

Compared 27% of the time

SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence vs IBM Tivoli OMEGAMON

Compared 23% of the time

Rocket Software Mainframe vs IBM Tivoli OMEGAMON

Compared 9% of the time

IntelliMagic Vision for zOS vs IBM Tivoli OMEGAMON

Compared 8% of the time

More IBM Tivoli OMEGAMON Competitors

SCOM vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 31% of the time

IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 25% of the time

BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 22% of the time

CA Automation Point vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 22% of the time

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence Competitors

Product Reports

No data available

Buyer's Guide

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

July 2025

Download OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence product report

Also Known As

IBM Candle, OMEGAMON

CA OPS MVS Event Management and Automation, CA OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation, Unicenter CA-OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation

Overview

IBM Tivoli OMEGAMON Performance Management Suite for z/OS is designed to provide real-time and historical performance and availability management. It offers these capabilities for IBM z/OS operating system, networks, storage subsystems, Java runtimes, IBM DB2, IBM CICS, IBM IMS, IBM MQ for z/OS and IBM WebSphere Application Server for z/OS in a single package. Optimize the efficiency and effectiveness of managing z/OS environments with a powerful, integrated tool set.

OMEGAMON Performance Management Suite for z/OS is available as part of IBM Service Management Suite for z/OS. IBM Service Management Suite for z/OS includes IBM Service Management Unite—a service management dashboard that brings mainframe management information and tasks from disparate sources into a single environment.

IBM

z/OS, its subsystems, databases, middleware, applications, and software generate thousands of event messages daily. IT professionals need a tool to filter, prioritize, and respond quickly to these events before they impact availability and threaten business processing and associated service level agreements. CA OPS/MVS EMA automates processes, enabling you to resolve problems as they arise. It also automates more routine tasks, simplifying IT management and operations.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Sharp Corporation

Tieto

Buyer's Guide

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence

July 2025

Free Report: OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence

Find out what your peers are saying about OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

863,331 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Mainframe Management vendors.

We monitor all Mainframe Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.