"The integration of IMS commands is very useful, because you do not have to switch to another tool to problem solve solutions."
"Enabled me to solve production problems faster or even avoid them preemptively with warnings."
"It's stable enough. I haven't noticed any problems since it was installed."
"More visualisation and support for mobile devices would be good."
"An expansion for distributed systems would be great, but probably not workable."
"We can't see the percentages to see the percentages of the CPU utilized. We should be able to see how much was used by our part of the system. Now, we have to continuously recalculate that information."
Earn 20 points
BMC MainView is ranked 2nd in Mainframe Management while IBM Tivoli OMEGAMON is ranked 1st in Mainframe Management. BMC MainView is rated 9.0, while IBM Tivoli OMEGAMON is rated 5.0. The top reviewer of BMC MainView writes "Enabled me to solve production problems faster or even avoid them preemptively with warnings". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Tivoli OMEGAMON writes "Good stability but it is lacking the ability to see historical information ". BMC MainView is most compared with SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence, ASG TMON, OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence and Rocket Software Mainframe, whereas IBM Tivoli OMEGAMON is most compared with Rocket Software Mainframe, SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence, ASG TMON, IntelliMagic Vision for zOS and OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence.
See our list of best Mainframe Management vendors.
We monitor all Mainframe Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.