IBM Tivoli OMEGAMON vs SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence comparison

 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Tivoli OMEGAMON
Ranking in Mainframe Management
1st
Average Rating
5.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SYSVIEW Performance Intelli...
Ranking in Mainframe Management
5th
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
27
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the Mainframe Management category, the mindshare of IBM Tivoli OMEGAMON is 25.0%, down from 28.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence is 19.8%, up from 9.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Mainframe Management
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

PB
Aug 19, 2019
Good stability but it is lacking the ability to see historical information
We can only see online information but there isn't any historical data to see something that happened a few hours previous. We don't have the ability to access that information. Previously, with MainView, we could look back at information from two days before and get information. We could easily get information from Plexus. Now, we don't have a single screen to check which has been annoying. Compared to MainView, Tivoli is rubbish. We are forced to use this solution. We couldn't stay with MainView. I would like for it to be easier to check the system performance. It should have the ability to see historical data. We can't see the percentages to see the percentages of the CPU utilized. We should be able to see how much was used by our part of the system. Now, we have to continuously recalculate that information.
it_user581055 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 4, 2017
The automatic JES2 spool cleanup is based on multiple filter criteria.
I would like to see better web browser support that display views, reports, and graphs. Currently, we use the IBM 3270 interface. It would be nice if we could access the data and display it in a more “modern” way. I think there is some web client offered via the Vantage product. It is unclear to me what possibilities this client offers, as I do not have Vantage installed. I would like to have a web client which supports all SYSVIEW functions and graphical dashboards. Perhaps this would enable us to export the data directly into an Excel format. After all, graphical displays on an IBM 3270 are not that great.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It's stable enough. I haven't noticed any problems since it was installed."
"Ability for system diagnostics"
"Thresholds with alerts are valuable, enabling us to fix a problem before it has an impact."
"​The stability is very reliable. We have not had any issues."
"The scalability is absolutely fine."
"Between the tech support and the person I was working with, they have been extraordinary."
"It is easy to see if anything is wrong. The queues on the system are fast, and it is very intuitive to locate something."
"When we changed to JES3, the programmers didn't have to know anything. The product provided the same interface with the same look and feel."
"We have not had any major issues in approximately 15 years."
 

Cons

"We can't see the percentages to see the percentages of the CPU utilized. We should be able to see how much was used by our part of the system. Now, we have to continuously recalculate that information."
"If a unit of work ID is associated with a CICS, a DB2, and a MQ transaction, and having that capability correlate to those different technologies via one business application transaction which would be beneficial."
"It confuses a lot of people because there are so many features, but when they see me bouncing around they say, "I didn't know it did that, I didn't know it did that." It takes a long time to find all the different features that are available."
"They are already working on improvements. One of them is the operational intelligence, which is a lot of stuff I am trying to learn and work on right now, which SYSVIEW reports to that all the system things which are going on."
"The documentation, like installation guides and stuff, put it all in one place.​"
"​We are using Datacom as the database system, so maybe a little bit more integration with that.​"
"The things that I would think about would be in relation to JES3. However, I don't know if they'll be able to do much more with that because I don't know how much longer IBM is going to be supporting JES3. So I can understand not doing additional development. But if I were to suggest something it would be the JES3 initiators, the JES3 queues."
"The documentation format could be better. I noticed with the last release that all of the manuals were bundled into one. It used to have a separate installation guide, user guide, etc."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Pricing is a little steep, but there are a lot of other functions that it brings together. It gives you one window to look through to get to a lot of different features. The more products you have from CA, the better pricing they have, the more you can get them doing more things for you."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mainframe Management solutions are best for your needs.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
23%
Computer Software Company
16%
Government
13%
Insurance Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
19%
Manufacturing Company
17%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Also Known As

IBM Candle, OMEGAMON
CA SYSVIEW Performance Management, CA SYSVIEW, Unicenter CA-SYSVIEW Realtime Performance Management
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Sharp Corporation
Tieto, Navy Federal Credit Union (NFCU)