IBM SSD vs Samsung SSD comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
52 views|40 comparisons
Samsung Logo
1,149 views|1,053 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Featured Review
Ranking
8th
out of 11 in SSD
Views
52
Comparisons
40
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
4th
out of 11 in SSD
Views
1,149
Comparisons
1,053
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview
IBM solid-state storage is affordable with innovative architectures, system and application integration, and management tools that:
  • Improve performance for hard-to-tune, I/O bound applications. No code changes required.
  • Reduce energy use and floor space. Can be filled near 100% without performance degradation.
  • Enable faster access times and IOPS.
Information Not Available
Sample Customers
Benefit, Employment and Support Services Division, State of Hawaii, INTERSPORT
ChyronHego, Muse Research, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Revention Inc.
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company12%
Comms Service Provider12%
Financial Services Firm9%
Computer Software Company8%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business27%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise54%

IBM SSD is ranked 8th in SSD while Samsung SSD is ranked 4th in SSD. IBM SSD is rated 0.0, while Samsung SSD is rated 7.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Samsung SSD writes "The software for transferring data from a hard drive was very intuitive and easy to use. ". IBM SSD is most compared with , whereas Samsung SSD is most compared with Western Digital SSD, SanDisk SSD, Intel SSD and HGST SSD.

See our list of best SSD vendors.

We monitor all SSD reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.